30 Boxes, Taking Calendaring to the Next Level

30 Boxes | it’s your life: Narendra Rocherolle is out with a post on what the past and future hold for 30 Boxes, the innovative new calendar software I’ve been using personally for the past six months or so. In his post he talks about some important issues that individuals face not just in the organization of their calendars but in the organization of their lives.

Central to Narendra’s idea of improving organization is something called a Timeline View. The idea with a Timeline View is that not just your schedule and your appointments, but all sorts of other information that you want ought to be organized. This timeline would include your calendar as well as a new application that they are developing called Supermail.

Supermail is an aggregator of email of sorts but goes much further. What I found most interesting about the concept of Supermail is that it would in addition to email try to track and organize information from your social networks and blogs.

One of the things about flickr that I hate is that it’s so damn difficult staying on top of so many conversations that I’m having there. I’ve got multiple groups with multiple conversations, multiple comments on photos, etc. Right now at Flickr I have to go back to each conversation individually (and remember where it was) in order to monitor and maintain these conversations. RSS might help a little but for whatever reason my RSS newsreader only pulls the last 10 comments on a Flickr thread. Some threads move super fast and this is not enough.

It sounds as though Narendra is looking to tackle how best to get this data to an individual in a single app. It’s hard for me to visualize still but this sounds super promising. In fact, we are also working at Zooomr on ways to improve conversation tracking and sharing as well.

Interesting, thought provoking stuff.

Google Image Labeler, Lame, Lame, Lame

Google Image LabelerGoogle Image Labeler Hosted on Zooomr

I just spent a few minutes playing with the Google Image Labeler game and have three words to describe it, lame, lame and lame.

I honestly have no idea how a company as smart as Google could think that this game will be their salvation when it comes to image search.

I have written a lot about how inferior Google Image Search (and other algorithmic based image search engines) are to Flickr image search in the past. And it would finally seem that Google is at least trying to get a clue to use actual human labor to better categorize their images. But they are going about this all wrong.

First off, the game is boring as hell. Sure there are a few mindless drones out there who might play for a bit, but nobody will keep playing this thing long term. Lets see, I get to tag random bad quality photos that I have no connection whatsoever with for… fun? I don’t think so. This game is about as fun as the game we play at the Hawk household called “Let’s Race.” “Let’s Race” is played like this. You do the dishes, I do the laundry, whoever finishes first is the big winner! On your mark, get set, goooooooo!

Of course Google does have reach and to that extent that there are always idiots in the world so I suppose they will always have players. But still. What a load of crap. Of course it probably makes a little more sense when you see on the game I played today that the number four winner today is going by the handle “Pokeman is Cool.” Do you really want someone named “Pokeman is Cool” deciding what things should be labeled anyways?

The other problem with this game is that it only helps Google find out what things are. So what if you’ve got 6 million images now tagged “San Francisco.” If you don’t know which ones are good and which one’s are not good it doesn’t do you much good. There is no ranking, faving, or activity function to this horrible game.

So what should Google do instead? Don’t be lame Google. Either build or buy a decent photo sharing site. People on Flickr LOVE to tag photos. Why do they LOVE to tag photos? Because they are their own photos first and foremost and secondly they are their friend’s photos or other photos that they actually admire on the site. And frequently it’s mutual. But they do more than just tag, they effectively (through their activity on a photo by marking it favorite, or comment, or whatever) also rank the image as well. And so an image tagged dog with 50 people marking it as a favorite is probably a more interesting image of a dog than a random one on Google.

By the way Google, I’ve got another cool game to pitch you on when you have a second. It’s called the who can sweep out the Google parking lot game the fastest. What you do is have people show up at the Googleplex and give them brooms. They race up and down rows in the parking lot sweeping up. The winner gets their name handle on a little the Google Clean Up the Parking Lot Game homepage. (People can play more than once). Think of the janitorial bills you could save. It would be brilliant.

Sheesh Google, come on, you can do a lot better than this. Really, this is not that difficult.

Number Two Digg User Quits in Hailstorm of Criticism Over Changes in the Service

digg – Gaming Digg / New Changes Well yesterday Kevin Rose announced changes to Digg’s algorithm and today Digg’s number two user (per their rankings) P9 has resigned from their service with a scathing public letter of criticism condemning the service.

“I believe you to be a good man, Kevin. Well intentioned or not: your blog satisfied malcontents equipped with baseless allegations while you effectively urinated on your top diggers (correction: top gamers). I wish you well. I will be turning over the Digg Users Support Group to someone else.”

In order to become one of the top social networkers on any site, while working for free, one has to have an incredible passion and devote an incredible amount of both time and emotional energy to the process. It is not surprising to me to see such charged language from P9 over his resignation.

Social networking sites like Digg and Flickr and MySpace must also come to terms with the fact, however, that those who spend the most time and energy on their sites are likely to become the one’s who know how to use the structure of the site to promote their own popularity best.

Recently Flickr changed it’s algorithm for Explore (those photos flickr selects as the top photos on their site each day) considerably. As a result there were some complaints from top users who ended up with less photos being promoted on the site.

Of course attention and popularity on a social networking site to some degree is a zero sum game. When Flickr has 500 photos that they highlight each day or Digg has X number of stories on their front page each day, each story or photo promoted means another will not be. So to this end there could be something to trying to preserve a more democratic slightly larger reach among your top users — of trying to nip their influence at least a bit from time to time.

There is also risk to social networking sites that your top users can gain too much popularity and may in the end use their popularity to promote a competitor of yours (such as is the offer by Netscape to effectively buy digg’s top users).

But Digg should take P9s letter seriously. When someone who has invested this much time and emotional energy responds so vitriolicly I think an examination must take place.

My own opinion of Digg is that I like it a lot. I think overall it works very well. I think it represents a new frontier and the future for news delivery. I like it’s somewhat unfiltered approach warts and all at times.

Perhaps my only criticism of the site is that I feel a tad more transparency is needed with regards to those who bury stories. Although those who digg a story positively are made a matter of public record on digg, those that bury a story may do so quietly and silently. I think that this invites abuse and even invites companies and groups to game digg to disrupt and kill hostile news about their companies.

I think both diggs (positives) and buries (negatives) ought to be disclosed to all digg users. If someone is burying a story because it is critical of their company or them personally at least this might be pointed out by others.

Interestingly enough it seems like those in the digg community are at least somewhat supportive of P9’s position as more have promoted his letter quiting digg than have demoted it.

Why You Won’t See Any Photos from The Neon Museum on Thomas Hawk’s Digital Connection and Why They Don’t Want Their Images Shared on Flickr

Delicatessen Liquor, Christmas Eve, 2005.jpgNeon sign, Ventura Boulevard, California. Hosted on Zooomr

I just got back a rather disappointing email from the Neon Musuem in Las Vegas. I had written to the musuem to inquire about taking photographs of some of their neon signs this past weekend while in Las Vegas. I’m not going to link to the museum. You can find them on Google if you want.

For those of you who don’t know what the Neon Museum is, it’s a boneyard of sorts of many of the old Las Vegas neon signs. It’s a place that these signs go to die and the non-profit Neon Museum states their mission as “to collect, preserve, study and exhibit neon signs and associated artifacts to inspire educational and cultural enrichment for diverse members of our international community.”

Unfortunately their policy with regards to photography does not seem to fit with their stated mission.

My interest in shooting the Neon Musuem was simply to share in a non commercial way my interpretation of neon art with the rest of the world. I already have a decent size collection of neon signs and images up on Flickr and I was hoping to add to my collection with some historically significant signs from the Neon Musuem. Because I value the preservation work that someone like the Neon Museum is doing I even offered to make a donation to the museum in conjunction with approval to shoot some of their pieces. I mentioned that my desire was non commercial and simply to promote the museum via my blog and flickr.

What I got back from them was something which I think runs contrary to their mission statement:

“Although many people have taken it upon themselves to post photos of the Boneyard on Flickr and other photo-sharing websites, we ask that no one do so. We are an educational facility first and foremost – and therefore do not allow stock photography. Photos that are uploaded to sites such as Flickr are not copy protected, and therefore are able to be lifted and used by unscrupulous people. As a result, we are trying to limit the number of images from our collection that are hosted on the web.”

This is wrong and backward thinking. As a non profit that says it’s mission is to exhibit their neon signs and who specifically mentions an international community, to restrict the exposure of their collection this way flies contrary in the face of both promoting and exhibiting their work internationally.

Rather than let the whole world explore the historically significant collection (did I mention I found out about the musuem in the first place by perusing shadowplay’s excellent set of neon sign images on Flickr), the Neon Museum would seek to lock their collection up lest (god forbid) some unscrupulous person dare use one of their images somehow. I’m not sure how potential unscrupulous users outweighs letting an entire international community (it’s not always easy for everyone from China or India to get to Las Vegas) appreciate their collection and build awareness and publicity for the good work that they are doing via the web.

I would hope that the Neon Museum would reconsider their policy of excesively protecting their images (really signs that in many regards probably most appropriately belong to all of us as historical artifacts of past generations). It is an unfriendly position for them to take and it is not at all what a public, non profit museum ought to be about. I fail to see how when the de Young Museum, with even greater valued art and artifacts, and the Oakland Musuem of California can open up their galleries for public photography that someone like the Neon Museum insists on being so unfriendly towards the very constituents, promoters and donors that they should instead be courting. Especially as neon is particularly well suited for photography I find this to be a shame indeed.

TiVo in the New York Times

In a TiVo World, Television Turns Marketing Efforts to New Media – New York Times Interesting. TiVo made the New York Times with an article talking about how they are continuing to become Madison Avenue’s best new friend.

Reusing the word “pariah” that he used before, Tom Rogers seems to be pushing the message of Tivo as a transformation from an ad zapper to a targeted ad deliver.

““A year or more ago, TiVo was a real pariah in advertising circles,” Mr. Rogers said, because of fears it would enable viewers to more efficiently avoid commercials by zipping through or zapping them as they watched shows on their DVR’s.

Now, advertisers and agencies understand that spot-dodging “is a fact of modern television viewing behavior,” he added, “and how TiVo can be a force to make advertising more effective.” For example, a service called TiVo Product Watch gives viewers the option to download on demand commercials that are meant to be more creative and informative than conventional spots.”

The article talks about a new deal TiVo has with CBS to begin bundeling recording of their upcoming new shows this fall.

Viva Las Vegas, My Weekend at the Bellagio

Sweet IllusionSweet Illusion Hosted on Zooomr

My photo essay of my weekend in Las Vegas is here.

Bright light city gonna set my soul
Gonna set my soul on fire
Got a whole lot of money thats ready to burn,
So get those stakes up higher

Las Vegas is a strange place. Marketed as the place to go to find a threesome, or to do things that you’d never consider doing in your real life, it is a place in the world where people go to let it all go. This woman sitting behind me in the airport right now is yammering on on her cell phone about her weekend of debauchery to her friend. “It felt like he was tongue raping my mouth,” she says about a guy she met at a club who said he really felt they made a connection and wanted to know if he could call her the next day. “He wasn’t even looking at my face,” she said, “he was just staring at my chest.”

“You have the most beautiful eyes,” he said.

“So I closed my eyes and asked him what color are my eyes.” “Brown,” he said.

“Wrong.”

She then goes on about how when her and her girlfriends went to a strip club that they had to walk through the men’s strip club first before getting to the women’s strip club. “Oh my God,” I could never be a stripper. “I can’t ever even imagine giving my boyfriend a lap dance like that.” It’s a titillating conversation that involves her resisting the male lap dancer at first but then ending up asking “can you buy me breakfast in the morning,” in the end.

And once again Vegas lives up to it’s sordid reputation.

Love American StyleLove American Style Hosted on Zooomr

But enough with the hook in the intro, what follows is a bit of a departure for Thomas Hawk’s Digital Connection. What follows is my review of a weekend in Las Vegas — much tamer than Ms. “I could never be a stripper” — but certainly a weekend of excess marking the oh my God how did we ever make it 10 years mark anniversary with my wife. This was not your normal weekend away with the kids to Circus Circus, No this was to be an all out no expense spared, over the top weekend.

The Bellagio: Overall the Bellagio is a great hotel to stay at. It has amazing art, amazing food, and all the glitz, glamour and silicone you’d ever want to see. It caters to more of an older upscale crowd but the experience for the most part is first class all the way.

The highlight of the Bellagio is a glass ceiling sculpture by Dale Chihuly — a giant almost life like dance of curves, color and light.

GuessGuess Hosted on Zooomr

Dale Chihuly’s giant sculpture in the Bellagio lobby.

The Bellagio also had a pretty great show of Ansel Adams’ photography. My favorite piece in the exhibit was also Adam’s most popular piece “Moonrise, Hernandez.” But there were many other great photographs in the exhibit as well. One which was particularly moving is a photograph Adams took while shooting with Dorothea Lange of some poor children in Richmond. Certainly a departure from more well known landscapes and one of the few pieces of his of this type. Much of the exhibit also centered on Adams as a conservationist and political activist with regards to environmental issues. There was no photography allowed in the Adams exhibit which was a bummer, but certainly understandable. The exhibit was truly spectacular.

The food at the Bellagio on the other hand was mixed.

The first night we ate at Sensi which I’d highly recommend. The menu is an Asian Italian fusion type of thing and the tuna appetizer (served three different ways with an especially delicious tartare) is not to be missed. Even more spectacular than the food though, the service at Sensi was outstanding. Our waiter was friendly, extremely responsive, knowledgeable and had a great sense of humor and his tip at the end of the night reflected this. Dinner at Sensi was one of the highlights of our trip. Very close to a perfect meal and the best meal we had over the course of our weekend. Also the cheapest.

Our second night we ate at Le Cirque. Le Cirque was the most expensive restaurant we ate at and of course had the reputation of, well, Le Cirque, to live up to. We did the chef’s tasting at Le Cirque and it was quite good — which of course was expected. Overall the experience was good, but when you are paying $500 for dinner it better be better than pretty good, it must be amazing.

You've Complicated EverythingYou’ve Complicated Everything Hosted on Zooomr

A few flaws with Le Cirque. First off, when I arrived I ordered a martini, over. The waiter’s response was would you like any particular type of vodka with that martini? When one orders a martini it should be understood that a martini is made with gin, not vodka. (As the rat pack rolls over in their graves). Every waiter should know this, and most certainly a waiter at Le Cirque. Had I ordered a vodka martini that question would have been perhaps a logical question to follow. Although one might assume that in the absence of a requested brand of gin or vodka that that question is unnecessary. After telling him that I wanted a gin not a vodka martini he then asked if by “over” I meant that I wanted it “on the rocks.” Again, any decent waiter or bartender should know that when you order a drink “over” that this is to be served on ice.

The other flaw had to do with the sommelier. Now again, these are petty, but when paying $500 for dinner you expect a certain level of service. Because the dinner was a very special dinner (celebrating our 10 year anniversary) I brought a very special bottle of wine, a bottle of 1994 Dalla Valle. Dalla Valle is a one of about six California Cult cabernets and very rare and very expensive. 1994 was an es
pecially good year
for cabernet in California. So when the waiter saw that I had brought my bottle of cabernet in he proceeded to tell me about the corkage policy of the restaurant — that a $35 charge would be assessed and that the wine could not be consumed unless it was not on their wine list. Fair enough. But then the sommelier proceeded to take the bottle back with him to investigate whether or not the wine was on their list. Having had a chance to peruse their list (I also ordered a glass of white Burgundy and Sauternes over dinner) I knew that no Dalla Valle was on their list. What’s more the only California cult wine that I saw on there was some more recent vintage bottles of Screaming Eagle (at about $3,000 a pop). They had no outstanding older California cabs.

So the sommelier was not familiar with their wine list, nor was he familiar with Dalla Valle cabernet or the fact that they didn’t really stock many cabernets from 1994 on their list. Fine if you are just a waiter, even forgivable if you are a sommelier at a regular old restaurant (I suppose), but certainly sub par for the sommelier at Le Cirque.

Our third night we ate at Shintaro. Shintaro has the second highest rating for Japanese food in Las Vegas according to Zagat (sometimes of course Zagat gets it terribly wrong of course). Because Shintaro was in our hotel and because Nobu (the safe choice for high end sushi) was over at the Hard Rock, we decided to give it a try. Bad move.

There’s nothing I hate more from a fine restaurant than when a waiter lies to you. When we arrived at Shintaro my wife immediately decided that the deck at the restaurant overlooking the Bellagio lake fountain water show was the perfect place for our dinner. There was one other couple eating out there but other than them there were about six empty tables. The waiter informed my wife that we could not sit out there because all of the tables were “reserved.”

She asked him a few more times and he insisted that they were already taken with other reservations. So we were both annoyed as we sat and ate our dinner over the course of the next hour and a half to see that after the one couple left the deck that not a single other customer was sat out there. When we left the restaurant in fact the deck was still completely empty. We certainly could have sat out there. There were no other reservations out there but the waiter just lied. Instead of saying well I don’t want to serve you outside, or we want to make our empty restaurant look fuller, he made up an excuse about them being reserved. Not the service you’d hope for from one of the most expensive Japanese restaurants in Las Vegas.

What’s more, the very expensive Sake was pretty terrible and the sushi was just mediocre at best. Other than a pretty good dragon roll the food was just ho hum, and the atmosphere in the restaurant terribly drab (except at the sushi bar where they have these really cool jellyfish tanks, but which is in another room entirely).

So you might think that the only thing we did in Vegas was eat. Not true of course. The other highlights of our weekend were the entertainment (and the photography for me of course).

The show we saw for the weekend was Cirque du Soleil’s Zumanity playing at New York, New York. Although I was a little bummed going in that Cirque de Soleil never responded to my media request to take photos of the performance to accompany this review (and it was impossible to sneak shots as the ushers watch you like hawks), I will say that the show was one of the best I’ve ever seen. It has a certain “adult” flavor with acrobatics, humor, terrific stage, lighting and sound effects, very funny interaction with the audience, and especially one of the sexiest performances inside of a giant glass bowl of water by a beautiful and talented dancer that I’ve ever seen. Very, very hot. If you don’t mind a little mild nudity (some of the performers wore body suits but some were topless as well) and you don’t mind the adult tone to the performance it is definitely one well worth catching.

Viva Las VegasViva Las Vegas Hosted on Zooomr

View of the Strip from Startosphere.

The other thing that we did for entertainment was to head up to the Stratosphere. The Startosphere is pretty amazing as well. 108 stories up, the Stratosphere is the highest observation deck west of the Mississippi. And of course there were rides. I’m usually not one to feel the fear of thrill rides. Roller coasters are just ho hum for me — fun, but lacking any true level of fear. Extreme, on the other hand, which dangles you out in open air over the edge of the 108 story high tower and then spins and shakes you around in the night air is something else entirely. They wouldn’t let me take my camera with me (and for good reason I suppose, as dropping a 5D 108 stories could be a deadly) but if you are a bit of a thrill seeker, I’d definitely recommend a trip up to the top of Stratosphere.

Extreme, #2Extreme, #2 Hosted on Zooomr

Spinning 108 stories up on the Stratosphere’s Extreme.

There are also plenty of free shows that go on at Vegas as well. An animated Greek type thing with laser show at Caesars (just ok I thought), a pirate show at Treasure Island (that I missed), Bellagio’s own water fountain (amazing to see), and a water and light show at the Wynn (fantastic for photos but a tad short).

So let’s see, what other final things to note. Oh, the air conditioning at the Bellagio sucks. We had it set to 60 and it was at least 85 in our room (uncomfortable for sure). They moved rooms for us the next day and the new room was slightly better but still it was at least 75 in the room at night when the thermostat was set to 60.

The pool at the Bellagio is first rate. Built around a sprawling garden it was one of the best pool set ups I’ve ever seen and included misters to mist you away as you laid out all day worshiping the sun (well not me really as I sunburn like hell and kept most of my time at the pool carefully positioned in the shade along with SPF 45 on as my friend — but if you are into the sun and all that laying out you’ll like the pool).

What else? Oh, the buffet at Paris is pretty good. It’s only about $14 or so and the food is really good. The Bellagio Cafe (which was not a buffet) was more money and not near as good as Paris’ buffet across the street. The Patisserie at Bellagio has the world’s largest chocolate fountain. Pretty impressive if you are the chocolate type.

And the shopping, my God, everywhere you go the shopping. Our cab driver said that retail has now passed gaming as Las Vegas’ top revenue source. More malls and more stores than I’ve ever seen in my life. A couple of times I was struck by how excessive it all seemed. Me, there in Las Vegas, consuming away like the best of them, when so many other people are still so bad off.

This visit to Vegas was such a stark contrast to my visit to New Orleans earlier this year where I spent time documenting some of the hardest hit Hurricane Katrina areas including the 9th Ward. New Orleans and Las Vegas are miles apart both physically and emotionally. “Can you handle this much shopping?” read the sign at the mall at the Aladdin. That I guess kind of represents the worst of what Vegas was even underneath all the glitz, glamour and, oh yeah, silicone.

As for my winnings or losings for the weekend?

I unfortunately came out a loser. My lone 25 cent bet (at the request of Microsoft’s Dan Plastina, we tried Dan) turned out to be a loser. I’m fortunately not much of a gambler though (I actually got an A in Statistics in college) so I didn’t mind this at all.