Thomas Hawk's Digital Connection

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Another Update on the Carlos Miller Arrest Story

Carlos Miller Police PhotoCarlos Miller Police Photo Hosted on Zooomr

So the arrest stories that I've been running on Miami journalist Carlos Miller have been getting a lot of attention. The story has appeared now on both Digg and BoingBoing and has generated quite a few comments with regards to the matter.

A couple of things I'd like to point out. First, I have been in contact with Carlos Miller directly on this matter. Carlos has not responded directly in these threads and forums to some of the criticism because there may be legal action pending on this one. For what it's worth, I hope he wins. But because of potential pending legal action he can't really carry on in the debate on this one at this time. He is reading the comments of course.

Carlos sent me the photo above which was one of the first photos that he took. In response to people who say that he was initially shooting in their face and not 20 yards away you can see his distance in this photo.

But what I also see in this photo is that the accident scene that the police are working on is not particularly a busy one. There is not rushing traffic by it. In fact there is a "Road Closed" sign right behind it. Seeing this photo makes me question why the police felt it was a safety hazard having him near them shooting. I think it's more plausible that these cops simply did not want their picture taken and someone stood up to them.

Now. Some people have suggested that Carlos is in the wrong here simply because when a cop tells you to do something, well, you'd damn well better do it. But here's the thing. These cops absolutely should *never* have asked Carlos not to photograph them in the first place. They should know that as public officers that they are allowed to be photographed. This has gone to court. The case is settled. But when he defied them they still should have taken the high road and just put up with it. Because again, the courts have ruled that having the ability to photograph the police is an important First Amendment right.

I'm glad that Carlos insisted on shooting the police even when asked not to because he stood up for my rights and the rights of every other photographer. The problem is that if everyone just does whats asked of them in the interest of "getting along" then abuse like this can happen. It reinforces it. I get in scuttlebutts with security guards at buildings here in San Francisco all the time when they tell me I can't photograph their building. A lot of people criticize me saying why don't you just do what your told? Why do you have to be a prick?

The reason why is because the security guards have no right asking me not to photograph a building from a public street in the first place. Likewise the police, in my opinion here, had no right to ask Carlos not to photograph them. Look at the photo above. There are plenty of places he could have shot this scene from without being a danger to himself or others.

Some people have objected to the flash. Saying that it's uncomfortable doing your job with a flash firing. Well it's uncomfortable for the celebrities that have the paparazzi shooting flash at them too. But it's not illegal. The fact of the matter is that our government and courts have ruled that when in public, photographers can take pictures of people. If people don't like this then have the rules changed. But until then it's not illegal to take a photo of someone with a flash.

Other people have suggested that it's just rude to take a photo of someone who does not want their photo taken. I happen to actually agree with this kind of. I've actually had plenty of people who afterwards asked me not to photograph them and almost every time I've complied. But there are times when I haven't and that's when people are abusing their power. Telling me I can't shoot a building. Running illegal background checks on me etc. Telling me not to shoot something that is not their person or their family.

Anyways, I'm glad to see that this issue is getting the attention that it deserves. I'm sad to read comments from people saying that Carlos was in the wrong for simply not listening to the police. This kind of attitude that the police can do what they want with impunity may in fact be a sad fact of life in places, but the only way to make things right is for the Carlos Millers of the world to stick up for themselves when this abuse occurs. I'd hope that I'd have the guts to stick up for myself the way Carlos did.

I actually really like the police in general. Some of my closest friends are cops, family members of mine are cops. I don't think all cops are bad. I think most cops play by the rules and act accordingly. I shoot cops here in San Francisco all the time and never have had a problem. When I shot a police action on Market Street here about a year and a half ago this cop actually turned to me after I shot him and made a joke saying, "make sure you get my good side." That attitude is refreshing. I appreciate that cop and the hard work that he does for me here in San Francisco. What I don't appreciate is cops who overstep their authority and abuse their power. And that is what I think happened to Carlos Miller.

23 Comments:

Anonymous SF Buckaroo said...

Blindly issuing orders irregardless of any actual law is symptomatic of the larger problem in this country: the way the current administration has issued one order after the next basically by fiat, ignoring the "rule of law" in the "war on terror." at the end of the day, police are charged with upholding *laws*. That's why they call the show "Law and Order." In my encounters with security and police officers while trying to take photos, I always ask "what is the law I am violating?" Only ONCE did an officer actually admit there was no law against photography. All the other times (about 10) the officers did not even seem to get the concept that *laws* are why we have *police*. If it were not for this "Law and Order" system, we would be living in a *police* state-- have we already passed that point?

2:08 PM  
Blogger Caleb said...

Thanks for keeping us updated on this, and I completely agree with the main points of your essay.

2:11 PM  
Blogger Jack said...

I was in Times Square this past weekend. There was a strong police presence, but the police happily posed for tourists when asked. The flower district is pretty tense with the evictions. I asked before shooting each shop. I've rarely been denied an opportunity for a photograph when I've asked. I take many public photos without asking. When I sense tension, I'll usually do everything possible to break the ice. If you look for a fight, you will usually find one.

website: www.time-less-image.com

web blog: http://time-less-image.typepad.com/comics_legends_and_lore/

4:13 PM  
Blogger .Hemaworstje said...

aah well . every country get's what it deserves.horno photjournalists and triggerhappy coppers.

blame it on your population that you have a goverment having rules like that and police acting like this.
a hyped country it is. blownout of proportions.

5:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have been harassed many times for photographing on public ways. This even happened years before 9/11. What amazes me is there are so many shootings, robberies, car thefts, home invasions, rapes, etc. Yet all the while the cops can't even put a dent in those but have time to investigate somebody taking photos? It seems to me law enforcement flunks in time and resource management.

7:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're not serious about using still photos to decide who's right & who's wrong? How do you know what happened between photos? Have you seen ALL photos?

5:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know I'm a little late to this party, but here's my two cent's worth.

I've lived in Miami my entire life and have known quite a few Miami and Metro cops, including a few who are good friends. I've partied with these guys and had opportunities to hear their stories, both good and bad. And based on what I've heard, I think Miller probably stumbled upon a few of the, shall we say, less that upstanding officers. To their credit, they tried to warn Miller, saying “You need to keep moving. This is a private matter.” Note that they didn't say "this is official police business" in which case they probably couldn't have cared less if he wanted to photograph them. Maybe Miller isn't very street smart, or at least not very "Miami street smart," because if he were to put two and two together he might have said "Oh... okay, c'ya later guys" and walked away. Now I can't say for certain what was going on that night, but five offices in that section of Biscayne Blvd... sounds like they were shaking down a petty drug dealer to me. What I can say is that it happens a lot. So the next time a Miami police officer tells you "this is a private matter"... have a clue and don't try to take photos. Miller was right about one thing, -he- wasn't breaking the law that night.

11:21 PM  
Blogger mkultra said...

I only recently came across your blog entries regarding being harassed/detained by private security guards and the Oakland sheriff. I'm glad to see it's sparked such a lively debate. We *need* to be talking about these things.

Anytime we, as the public, allow fear to erode any of our constitutional rights, it's a win for the idiots who desire to instill such fear in us.

We *clearly* have the constitutional right to take photographs in public places. We *clearly* have the right to photograph police during the execution of their duties, as long as we do not interfere with them. These freedoms are critical because they ensure the public's ability to prevent abuse of power and accurately document events that take place in the, "public forum." These rights have been upheld, unequivocally, via case law over the years.

We also all have the right to expect to not be stopped, detained or otherwise restricted unless there is probable cause to suspect we are engaged in criminal activity or are a material witness to the same.

With *very* few exceptions (military installations, certain nuclear facilities, etc.), the public has the right to photograph whatever and whomever they want to... in public spaces. If you (or your building) is viewable from a public space -- you may be photographed. In short, if an eyeball can see it from public property, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

Of course, that doesn't apply to photography while *on* private property. As a private property owner, I have every right to tell you I don't want photos taken while your on my property. If you do take photos, I can tell you to leave, and if you don't, have you charged with criminal trespass. That still doesn't give me the right to do anything to you other than tell you to leave. I can't touch your camera, confiscate film, etc.

Keep fighting the fight. It irks me to read all the entries from folks who insinuate that you should just bend-over and accept having your 1st amendment rights stepped-on. You shouldn't. You should make as big a stink as is necessary to ensure overreaching security zealots receive an education in constitutionally protected freedoms.

2:12 PM  
Blogger mkultra said...

P.S.

If (as the previous post sort-of suggested) Carlos was actually photographing police graft in action -- then huge kudos to him. That's one defense fund I would be happy to contribute to. Anyone with balls enough to stand up to corruption is a winner in my book.

3:05 PM  
Blogger mkultra said...

and, for what it's worth, I'm a senior security engineer for a 40,000+ person company. It's my job, daily, to balance the civil rights of our employees against the legitimate protections our company is entitled to. These two interests are frequently at odds.

I, for one in the security profession, *always* err on the side of protecting the individual rights of an employee (or anyone else that pops up on my radar for any reason). I believe that this policy is, overall, in the best interest of the company I work for.

Not all security people are goons. Some genuinely study the law and respect it deeply.

3:16 PM  
Blogger lotro gold said...

lotro gold
lord of the rings gold
lord of the rings online gold
lotro gold
lord of the rings gold
lord of the rings online gold
Warhammer gold
Warhammer online gold
Warhammer money
War gold
War money
Tabula Rasa Credit
lotro gold
lord of the rings gold
lord of the rings online gold
lord of the rings online gold
lord of the rings gold
Tabula Rasa Credit
World of Warcraft gold
PotBS Doubloon
Pirates of the Burning Sea Doubloon
PotBS Gold
Pirates of the Burning Sea Gold
lotro gold
lord of the rings gold
lord of the rings online gold
Tabula Rasa Credit
Warhammer gold
Warhammer online gold
PotBS Doubloon
PotBS gold
Age of Conan gold
Age of Conan gold
Pirates of the Burning Sea gold
Pirates of the Burning Sea Doubloon

3:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

我们是专业的翻译公司
深圳翻译公司中领先
深圳翻译公司提供
英语翻译
日语翻译
法语翻译
德语翻译
俄语翻译
藏语翻译
韩语翻译

泰语翻译
越南语翻译
维族语翻译
瑞典语翻译
印尼语翻译
阿拉伯语翻译
马来西亚语翻译
菲律宾语翻译
意大利语翻译
希腊语翻译
柬埔寨翻译
土耳其语语翻译
西班牙语翻译
葡萄牙语翻译
能源翻译
乌克兰翻译

地质翻译
合同翻译
法律翻译
机械翻译
标书翻译
医学翻译
外贸翻译
食品翻译
保险翻译
化工翻译
农业翻译
汽车翻译
通信翻译
建筑翻译
物流翻译
工程翻译

广州翻译公司
深圳翻译
深圳翻译公司
英语翻译
日语翻译
法语翻译
德语翻译
俄语翻译
藏语翻译
韩语翻译
泰语翻译
翻译公司|北京翻译公司|
同声传译|同传设备出租|
来的会议设备租赁
同声传译
同传设备出租|
上海翻译公司|
北京翻译公司|广州翻译公司
深圳翻译公司|新疆租车|
越南语翻译
印度语翻译
瑞典语翻译
印尼语翻译
阿拉伯语翻译
马来西亚语翻译
菲律宾语翻译
意大利语翻译
爱尔兰语翻译
柬埔寨翻译
土耳其语语翻译
西班牙语翻译
葡萄牙语翻译
外语翻译
小语种翻译
广州深圳同声传译|
证件翻译
合同翻译
法律翻译
机械翻译
标书翻译
医学翻译
外贸翻译
食品翻译
技术翻译
化工翻译
农业翻译
汽车翻译
通信翻译
英译汉,汉译英
汉译日,日译汉
金融翻译
新疆租车

珠海翻译公司|
佛山翻译公司|
惠州翻译公司
汕头翻译公司
三亚翻译公司
东莞翻译公司
深圳无线导览|
口译|
翻译公司非常好
翻译公司欢迎您的访问!

12:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

在这里我给大家介绍一家值得信赖的深圳搬家公司,在深圳多次出色的完成了搬家、搬厂等任务,欢迎有需求的朋友拨服务联系一下他们!深圳市顺顺发搬家服务有限公司,是经深圳市工商局批准注册的一家专业的深圳搬家搬厂。自成立多年以来已经多次的为深圳企业、个人提供了优质的深圳搬家服务,现在以拥有多台各种吊装和运输的车辆,并且培养了一批经验丰富、高素质、高水平的专业深圳空调拆装员工。长期以来龙华搬家承蒙深圳市民和各大企业的关照,公司不断完善“顺顺发福田搬家,诚信到家”的经营理念,成为2006年“11部委反商业欺诈、树诚信经营”的加盟企业

2:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

清洁服务公司深圳市清洁服务公司成立于1999年,是深圳市最早提供深圳管道疏通疏通厕所下水道,,清理化粪池化油池,、防水,上下水安装维修相关服务深圳市清洁服务公司之一,现在全市有20多个分部。专车吸粪、专业化队伍和各种先进机械,承接各种疑难管道疏通、专车清理化粪池、防水堵漏,上下水安装及维修等工程

2:04 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

深圳装饰工程有限公司是由热爱装修专业人士创办,经深圳市工商行政管理局注册登记的专业深圳装修公司。该深圳装饰公司装修队伍工种齐全,云集了全国各地的专业深圳装修施工人员深圳装修服务

2:04 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

雅美居装饰设计有限公司有十一年,深圳装修,深圳装潢设计经历,公司承接:深圳装饰设计服务、本装修公司处处为客户着想,深受客户好评,本公司以成为有实力的深圳装修公司之一

2:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

我家的房子要装修了.你们能给我推荐一家深圳装修公司要能在深圳装修过多年,对于深圳装饰非常了解。要求优秀的深圳装饰公司谢谢哟!修工程

2:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

深圳市鹏城搬迁有限公司成立于1999年,是经深圳市运输局批准和工商局注册成立的一家具有独立法人资格的专业深圳搬家搬厂、还有深圳吊装深圳搬迁公司!服务,深圳市深圳拆装空调服务,拥有最完善的搬迁设备和一批技术人员,提供深圳托运公司.上海物流公司

2:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

公司成立于1994年,是经深圳市运输局批准和工商局注册成立的一家具有独立法人资格的专深圳罗湖搬家公司、搬厂、搬写字楼、拆装空调、起重吊装的有限责任制公司,拥有最完善的深圳搬厂搬迁设备和一批技术精、经验好的员工队伍。为了给需要的朋友就近联系,我们特设为了顺顺发深圳南山搬家公司深圳福田搬家公司、福田搬家公司 深圳宝安搬家公司、深圳宝安搬家公司 深圳吊装公司为您就近提供服务!

2:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

在这里我给大家介绍一家值得信赖的深圳搬家公司,在深圳多次出色的完成了搬家、搬厂等任务,欢迎有需求的朋友拨服务联系一下他们!深圳市顺顺发搬家服务有限公司,是经深圳市工商局批准注册的一家专业的深圳搬家搬厂。自成立多年以来已经多次的为深圳企业、个人提供了优质的深圳搬家服务,现在以拥有多台各种吊装和运输的车辆,并且培养了一批经验丰富、高素质、高水平的专业深圳空调拆装员工。长期以来龙华搬家承蒙深圳市民和各大企业的关照,公司不断完善“顺顺发福田搬家,诚信到家”的经营理念,成为2006年“11部委反商业欺诈、树诚信经营”的加盟企业

2:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

广州市鸿发装饰工程有限公司,是广州市建设局首批核准的具有施工资质的专业广州装修公司广州装饰公司以灵活的独立发展模式,本公司承接广州装修,宾馆装修、星级酒店、广州装饰高级写字楼、大型商场、民用小区、高尚住宅、大型厂房、机场、火车站、码头、古建筑等各类大小装修工程

2:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

深圳市时代物流有限公司是一家深圳货运公司经市运输批准许可,工商、税务注册成立的具有独立法人资格的深圳物流公司,中型深圳货运的企业。专用香港货运货物存放仓库5600多平方米,为企业、商场提供24小时仓储,深圳货运公司配送服务。

2:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

深圳市的经济快速的增长,与人口流动过快,加速了发展,从而,涌现出了一大批深圳搬家公司,深圳搬迁公司而且出现了公司名称混乱,让人无法选择正规的深圳搬家公司来为自己服务.深圳市吉利您提供深圳吊装,吊车出租,空调制冷,深圳搬迁服务!

2:07 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home