PickStation, Very Cool, But Will it Get Shut Down?

PickStation So Marshall Kirkpatrick, just twittered about PickStation and I went to go check it out and I have to give it two thumbs up.

It looks like they are trying to do a sort of Hype Machine/digg mashup, but letting you download the mp3s directly from their site rather than to go the step further and click through to the blogger’s blog (where half the time they’ve been taken down if they are old links and you have to go use Acquisition to get it).

I can’t imagine PickStation will survive long if it gets popular. Best I can tell it was launched last July but today is the first that I’ve heard of it.

Still the idea of a direct download DRM free mp3 service built behind a social network seems pretty hot. And there does appear to be a lot of good legal music on the site.

Napster, Limewire, Bittorent, Acquistion, Allofmp3, P2P, hype machine, borrow your “friend’s” 250 gig hard drive and copy over all of his mp3s for sport and fun, pickstation etc. etc. etc. It’s the continuing game of playing pound the pop up only to have it pop up someplace else. Someday maybe there will be a place where you can go to get good cheap DRM free tracks for a fair price.

The New York Times on Corbis and the Future of the Stock Photography Market

Photographer's AssistantPhotographer’s Assistant Hosted on Zooomr

[I am CEO of Zooomr, we are building an online stock photography company]

A Photo Trove, a Mounting Challenge – New York Times

“More interesting and innovative things are happening on the pages of Flickr these days than on Corbis and Getty,” said Mr. Shenk, referring to the photo-sharing site owned by Yahoo. “If we can use this type of opportunity to find the next great group of Corbis photographers, that also makes it a great opportunity for us.”
— Gary Shenk, President, Corbis

The New York Times is out with an interesting article on the state of the stock photography business. The article mostly revolves around Corbis’ plans for the business and features Corbis’ President (and soon to be added CEO title) Gary Shenk.

Corbis is 100% owned by Bill Gates and has an impressive collection of over 100 million images, including some of the most famous and historically significant images in existence. Rosa Parks, Albert Einstein, Marilyn Monroe, all sit in Corbis’ impressive collection.

Corbis added significantly to their library when in 1995 they purchased the Bettmann archive. The Bettmann Archive was actually the result of a number of different collections coming together and features some of the world’s most significant historical photos. According to Corbis, some of the images in the library are over 100 years old. PBS did a great article on the Bettmann archive and on Bill Gates’ and Corbis’ role in acquiring it, digitizing it and preserving it in 2004.

Getty and iStockphoto are also mentioned in the article as well as Corbis’ own plans to announce their entry into the microstock business, “sometime this quarter,” according to Shenk and the Times.

Barbara Coffey, of Kaufman Brothers (a Wall Street research firm) is quoted in the article about the future of the microstock business,

“Think about how visual the world is,” said Barbara Coffey, a senior research analyst at Kaufman Brothers in New York who follows the stock photography market. “We have pictures on our cellphones. If I can get a reasonably clear picture and the rights are cleared and I pay $2 for it, then why would I pay Corbis $200?”

But this is only part of the future of the stock photography business. The bigger part is the gap between the roughly $250 per image average that Corbis sells their royalty free images for today and the microstock business. Because here is where the most potential exists.

Although some of top advanced amateurs on places like Flickr and Zooomr are selling their work through microstock agencies right now, many of the very best also are not. Conceptually it’s hard to sell a piece of art that is great for $1 for many people, and rightly so. Much of the best of the advanced amateur art at places like Flickr and Zooomr is every bit as good as what the top Pros are shooting for Corbis and Getty.

And this is why at Zooomr we are working on a platform to allow these advanced amateurs access to the “big boys” stock photography market. We believe that when the world has access to the freshest, cutting edge, interesting and innovative work that is being created in a rights cleared way that this will in turn make the world of photography a better and more beautiful place.

The Corbis and the Getty’s of the world indeed have some of the most amazing and historically important photos that have been shot in the past 100 years. But as we are fond of saying at Zooomr, the best photographs in the world have yet to be taken.

Looking Forward to Catching Robyn Hitchcock and Venus 3 at Slim’s Tomorrow Night

www.myspace.com/robynhitchcock Well I’m super excited about heading out to the Robyn Hitchcock show at Slim’s tomorrow night. I’ve been a fan since way back of Hitchcock’s music.

Tomorrow night he’ll also be joined by Venus 3 which includes 1/3 of REM in the form of special guest Peter Buck along with Scott McCaughey and Bill Rieflin.

Anyways, check out Robyn’s MySpace page if you want to hear some of the cuts from his latest album Ole! Tarantula. Robyn’s official site is here.

Thanks also to Mike Magnuson for arranging a photo pass for me for the show. If you make it out tomorrow night, I’ll be the guy in the Blogger shirt and jeans with the camera.

Slim’s, by the way, is a great place to see a show. Small and super intimate. I haven’t been there for a few years but am definitely looking forward to it tomorrow night.

If you want to buy tickets for the show you can get them at tickets.com. Just do a search for Hitchcock.

And if you want to check out some earlier Hitchcock stuff, Jonathan Demme made a film in 1998 called Storefront Hitchcock.

Also, last month Hitchcock and Venus 3 were the feature of John Edginton’s hour long “Sex, Food, Death and Insects” on the Sundance Channel. It will be playing again in July.

Hitchcock and Venus 3 also perform on Thursday at Spaceland in Los Angeles and Saturday at Club Congress in Tucson, AZ.

Top 25 Referrers to Thomas Hawk’s Digital Connection for March 2007

In keeping with my monthly report of top referral sources for my blog, here are the top 25 referrers to thomashawk.com for the month of March, 2007. If the site was on the list last month I’ve included it’s rank. If it’s new I have an asterisk.

1. slashdot.org (4)
2. boingboing.net (5)
3. images.google.com (2)
4. science.slashdot.org*
5. google.com (6)
6. flickr.com (3)
7. theagitator.com*
8. digg.com (1)
9. thomashawk.com (14)
10. digital-photography-school.com (13)
11. twitter.com*
12. bloglines.com (11)
13. beta.zooomr.com*
14. del.icio.us (7)
15. images.google.co.uk (17)
16. macsurfer.com (9)
17. scobleizer.com (10)
18. macdailynews.com*
19. techmeme.com (12)
20. images.google.ca*
21. woostercollective.com (21)
22. podtech.net (16)
23. images.google.de (19)
24. blog.retrosight.com*
25. technorati.com*

Let’s Talk About Race and Photography

I got a comment on a photo on Flickr today of a white couple that I shot at Liberty Cafe in Bernal Heights from Sentridoh, the comment read, “how come you only shot the white people that live in bernal?” It’s not the first time that this criticism has come up with regards to my photography. Recently another photographer that I admire wrote me privately saying, “i hate to say it, but man, all your subjects are so painfully white and upper middle class. it’s scary!”

This is not true of course. I do have photos I’ve taken of black people and other people of color, but on a proportional basis, I’m sure that I do have a higher percentage of white people than not. In part this probably has to do with the locations that I live and shoot in, but maybe there’s something more to this too.

Race is a messy thing. Talking about it inevitably brings up strong emotional feelings and reactions and you risk putting yourself in a position that people end up calling you a racist. I’m not a racist though.

I actually would like to shoot more people of color than I do. Maybe I’ll try to focus on more of them that I see out and about shooting street. Or maybe I’ll just not worry about it and shoot whoever I feel like and see that looks interesting.

I do think that part of this issue involves where I shoot. I shoot a lot for San Francisco Magazine and also where I work in downtown San Francisco.

I also shoot a lot of tech events. At tech events I think there are less black people perhaps than are more generally represented in the population. This is not absolutely the case though and I’ve shot black people and white people at tech events — but the fact of the matter is, if you show up at TechCrunch 7 in Menlo Park and shoot, you’re going to see more white people there than are generally represented in the broader population. Same goes for geek dinners and photography meetups and other events that I find myself at from time to time.

In the case of San Francisco Magazine, typically I’m shooting very specific venues. These are often more expensive restaurants, clothing stores, bars, etc. in upscale neighborhoods or suburbs. Typically there are more white people at these venues than black. Although again, not always of course, here’s the shot that SF Magazine ran when I shot the Big Four Restaurant at the Huntington Hotel up on Nob Hill for them.

In part there may be something more subconscious going on as well. I have had actually some reasonably uncomfortable run ins with black people when out shooting street. Part of this may be because I’m a middle aged white dude or maybe not. Earlier this week I was shooting downtown Oakland and this black girl really freaked out and went off on me when I was trying to shoot the De Lauer’s neon sign. She told me to get my ass and my camera out their neighborhood and a consensus was quickly building with about a dozen black kids that I wasn’t welcome there. Fortunately for me a cop came out of the drugstore as the altercation was getting more serious and I quickly hoped over to a nearby street and shot over there. This is not the first time that I’ve had altercations with black people while out shooting street. I’ve had white people object to my shooting as well, but in terms of the general public it seems that the confrontations with black people have been slightly more intense.

I think I also tend to avoid some of the more high crime neighborhoods, especially after dark and so my night shooting especially tends to be in neighborhoods more proportionally representative of white people. I don’t shoot often in West Oakland after dark without a large group of photographers because I’ve personally been both the victim of theft in that neighborhood multiple times and I’ve witnesses assaults first hand in that neighborhood. Carrying around about $8,000 worth of camera and computer gear especially makes me think twice about shooting in some of the worst neighborhoods after dark.

I think part of the answer to the race question also has to do with how I shoot. Except for my close friends and family, generally I interact very, very, little with the people that I shoot. Because I don’t interact with them, I think that there is a natural distrust of strangers with cameras. This distrust may be magnified by both racial and economic disparity between me and the people that I might shoot.

Building trust takes work. It takes time. Some of the best photo journalists spend years with their subjects really getting to know them and really building a foundation of trust that can create truly a level of intimacy with photography. I don’t do this. I rarely open myself up to people that I meet in person with my photography. Most of the people I shoot, white, black, or otherwise are not even aware that I’m shooting them. I don’t take the time to get to know people or do this kind of photography. Maybe I need to spend less time shooting and more time building the personal relationships that would allow me better access to worlds beyond my own socioeconomic world.

I actually would like to shoot more black people and if anyone would ever like to invite me to a specific event where me and my camera would be welcome I’d look forward to an opportunity like that. I don’t know a better way to build bridges necessarily than that.

Race is a tough thing to discuss. Before you call me a racist though recognize that I’d like to actually see more black people represented in my photography and honestly hope that a conversation, education and dialog can help make that possible.

Conversation on this here.