<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Walt Disney Company, Photography Is Not a Crime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Gardner</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-575563</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-575563</guid>
		<description>I bet Walt would have loved this!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet Walt would have loved this!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-322654</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-322654</guid>
		<description>I know this is old, but I&#039;ve been backtracking through the blog history and this topic struck a chord.  A couple years back I tried to photograph the Shops at La Cantera a couple months after the construction was finished.  It was designed by a local architect and, as an architecture student, I had an interest in the development of space and how the organized the &quot;outdoor mall&quot; experience.  It was after sunset and the lighting was really striking.  I had taken two pictures when a security guard rushed up and asked me to leave.

I asked if there was a problem and he said that no one was allowed to take photos on the property because there was a fear that, if they found their way to the internet, it could possibly mark the location for a terrorist attack.  I scoffed at this and told him he was already in trouble then due to the hundred or so images the developer and architect had posted on the web.  Not to mention the scans of the rendered floor plans the architect had released to the media and on the web.  

I left, it wasn&#039;t worth being confrontational.  There were still tons of people around and I wasn&#039;t going to make a scene.  I really hope this issue was resolved.  Photos are expressions of passed experiences.  If you&#039;re going to create a place where people will have memorable experiences, don&#039;t be surprised if they desire to take photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is old, but I&#8217;ve been backtracking through the blog history and this topic struck a chord.  A couple years back I tried to photograph the Shops at La Cantera a couple months after the construction was finished.  It was designed by a local architect and, as an architecture student, I had an interest in the development of space and how the organized the &#8220;outdoor mall&#8221; experience.  It was after sunset and the lighting was really striking.  I had taken two pictures when a security guard rushed up and asked me to leave.</p>
<p>I asked if there was a problem and he said that no one was allowed to take photos on the property because there was a fear that, if they found their way to the internet, it could possibly mark the location for a terrorist attack.  I scoffed at this and told him he was already in trouble then due to the hundred or so images the developer and architect had posted on the web.  Not to mention the scans of the rendered floor plans the architect had released to the media and on the web.  </p>
<p>I left, it wasn&#8217;t worth being confrontational.  There were still tons of people around and I wasn&#8217;t going to make a scene.  I really hope this issue was resolved.  Photos are expressions of passed experiences.  If you&#8217;re going to create a place where people will have memorable experiences, don&#8217;t be surprised if they desire to take photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paid To Try &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tips To Avoid Paid Survey Companies Scams</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-288967</link>
		<dc:creator>Paid To Try &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tips To Avoid Paid Survey Companies Scams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 06:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-288967</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey Walt Disney Company, Photography Is Not a Crime &#124; Thomas Hawk &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey Walt Disney Company, Photography Is Not a Crime | Thomas Hawk &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WOWP &#8211; I Almost Drowned in a Chocolate Fountain (part 1) HQ</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-230606</link>
		<dc:creator>WOWP &#8211; I Almost Drowned in a Chocolate Fountain (part 1) HQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-230606</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey Walt Disney Company, Photography Is Not a Crime &#124; Thomas Hawk Digital Connection [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey Walt Disney Company, Photography Is Not a Crime | Thomas Hawk Digital Connection [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commercial And Residential Storage Sheds &#124; JC Woodworking Reclaimed Timber Sellersville, PA</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-230316</link>
		<dc:creator>Commercial And Residential Storage Sheds &#124; JC Woodworking Reclaimed Timber Sellersville, PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-230316</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey Walt Disney Company, Photography Is Not a Crime &#124; Thomas Hawk &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey Walt Disney Company, Photography Is Not a Crime | Thomas Hawk &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magic Kingdom&#8217;s Totalitarian Rule &#171;</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-230303</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic Kingdom&#8217;s Totalitarian Rule &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 02:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-230303</guid>
		<description>[...] Read about the whole encounter on Beem&#8217;s blog here (via Thomas Hawk). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read about the whole encounter on Beem&#8217;s blog here (via Thomas Hawk). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kortney Thoma</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-229654</link>
		<dc:creator>Kortney Thoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-229654</guid>
		<description>Yeah, sounds a little one sided. I&#039;m curious what it is that made them single him out. I&#039;m sure Disneyland/world has lots of photographers on it&#039;s premises everyday and I can&#039;t imagine they treat everyone as such. Could there have been a complaint? Could it have been racial profiling? Could they have been alerted to something suspicious? Could they have previously been on a terror alert? Who knows. I doubt your friend will ever get the answer unless he seeks legal action but he could contact them directly and seek an apology. Or he could lodge a harassment complaint with the police. But the bottom line is that he too was uncooperative by not supplying his license (however unfair the request was)... I guess you have to give some to get some...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, sounds a little one sided. I&#8217;m curious what it is that made them single him out. I&#8217;m sure Disneyland/world has lots of photographers on it&#8217;s premises everyday and I can&#8217;t imagine they treat everyone as such. Could there have been a complaint? Could it have been racial profiling? Could they have been alerted to something suspicious? Could they have previously been on a terror alert? Who knows. I doubt your friend will ever get the answer unless he seeks legal action but he could contact them directly and seek an apology. Or he could lodge a harassment complaint with the police. But the bottom line is that he too was uncooperative by not supplying his license (however unfair the request was)&#8230; I guess you have to give some to get some&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All About Vintage Rhinestone Jewellery &#124; Antique RhineStone Jewelry</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-229587</link>
		<dc:creator>All About Vintage Rhinestone Jewellery &#124; Antique RhineStone Jewelry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-229587</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey Walt Disney Company, Photography Is Not a Crime &#124; Thomas Hawk &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey Walt Disney Company, Photography Is Not a Crime | Thomas Hawk &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-229438</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 03:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-229438</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be willing to be there&#039;s more to this story than is being told. Thus far, it&#039;s a one sided he said ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be willing to be there&#8217;s more to this story than is being told. Thus far, it&#8217;s a one sided he said &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Alexander</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2010/04/hey-walt-disney-company-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-229291</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7689#comment-229291</guid>
		<description>Minor correction to my prior comment.  Diane Disney Miller is the correct name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor correction to my prior comment.  Diane Disney Miller is the correct name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

