Thoughts on Community Management

Community

Chris Myles, an active Buzz user, albeit a critical one, has a buzz post out suggesting that Google Buzz needs a “Customer Advocate,” to do “community management” for Buzz. I suspect that as Buzz grows over time, that community management types might begin being added to the product team. Having been very involved in web communities over the course of the past seven years or so, I thought I’d post some of my own thoughts on this subject matter.

So far to date, I think Google has been doing a *very* good job with community management on Buzz without having any specific individual as a formal “community manager.” Overall it seems that many on the team, from product managers to engineers, are simply informally doing a lot of good community management directly themselves.

Engineer DeWitt Clinton has perhaps been the most vocal Google engineer interacting with Buzz’s users, but his voice is far from a solo one from the team. Bradley Horowitz, who describes himself as a “Product Dude” at Google, is a significant Google executive voice who is providing community management. So is Todd Jackson, Buzz’s Product Manager. Josh Willis has been vocal. And many, many others on the team have consistently dropped into conversations providing sort of unofficial community management.

Even more impressive, many Google employees who are *not* on the Buzz team, still are actively participating in Buzz and directing threads to the team or helping out in other ways whenever they can. I’m talking about you Erica Baker. :) It is obvious to me that the spirit of good community management is highly valued by the team and it’s leadership. I’m impressed.

So, does Buzz *need* an official community manager? I suspect that they *might* at some point. Buzz is still early and the hand holding that the team is providing likely can’t scale with millions of users in the long run. But before we just assume that they need to start hiring managers, let’s keep in mind that community managers aren’t always necessarily good for communities. In fact community mismangers can sometimes actually be poisonous for a community. That said I think that great care should be used in the selection of the right community managers for any community and whenever possible non-interventionist tools should be considered before community management intervention.

Principles of good community management:

1. Whenever possible, empower your users to deal with internal community problems *themselves* directly. Empower them with the technological tools to self manage community conflict.

One of the problems on Flickr is that over the years there have been some powerfully and negatively hostile community interactions. Malicious anonymous harassing trolls have invaded groups and people’s photostreams and other public areas of the site and posted the most hateful and objectionable material. The first line of defense against these sorts of negative elements is to empower your users to deal directly, immediately and decisively with these sorts of situations.

Trolls, spammers, racists, hate mongers, etc. will invade any community. It is only a matter of time. But the first line of defense against dealing with these individuals should be a robust “block” feature. One of the things that FriendFeed did right from the get go was their “Block this user” function. Basically using the block this user function on Friendfeed wipes that user off the face of FriendFeed for you. They are gone. Entirely invisible. This is a powerful tool. It’s powerful because it *immediately* removes personally objectionable content from before a users’ eyes (by choice). Rather than reporting bad behavior (which still ought to be able to be done) this immediately addresses the negative situation and empowers the offended party by feeling that they have power and control over the negative situation that they are dealing with.

Further, a robust block command actually *discourages* trolling, spamming, racism, hate speech, etc. Because these people are quickly minimized and end up talking to themselves and unable to get a reaction grow tired and move on.

If you can solve a problem with technology, that’s superior to solving it with community management.

2. Be very, very, very, careful with censorship. Censorship should *not* be an everyday hammer that a community manager uses to solve every potential problem. The censorship on Flickr as applied by community managers is really bad. I’ve had literally hundreds of hours of my own work permanently deleted there. This pisses me off as a user to no end. If feels personal and spiteful and petty and creates an enormous amount of ill will. A good community manager should resist the urge to simply censor someone they disagree with, or who is reported, or who they don’t like personally.

There will be times when censorship is necessary. Illegal content for example. If a company gets a DMCA notice, they will likely have to deal with copyrighted material in their network. But even here, the *greatest* of care should be taken to censor as little as humanly possible. A few years back I posted a screenshot of a known griefer’s television appearance on Fox news. This individual filed a false DMCA request to have the image removed with Flickr. The EFF later pursued this individual and as part of a settlement against him made him publicly apologize for illegally abusing the DMCA. But the way that Flickr handled this was not by simply doing the legal minimum of removing the image, they actually nuked hundreds of comments that went along with the image unnecessarily.

If there is some thread that must removed. Kill the absolute bear minimum. Be strategic. Take out a single line, not an entire thread, and certainly not thousands of other completely non-offensive threads, simply because they are tied to a user that you’ve found offensive in one instance.

3. Hire someone who lives, eats, sleeps, breathes, your community. Consider hiring from within. Good community management is not a 9 to 5 job. It doesn’t go on vacation. Hire someone who is emotionally invested and involved in your community and who has a deep seated passion and love for the product you are creating and for the difference that it is making in the world.

4. Hire someone who can get out on the road. There is nothing like face time. You cannot underestimate the enormous amount of positive energy that can be generated for any community when real life social interaction begins to take place. Recently I had an opportunity to spend some time photographing music service Pandora. I met their founder Tim Westergren. When I met Tim, one of the things that he was most proud of was of a map pinned up outside his office which documented all of the cities that he’d visited going around the entire U.S. holding meet ups with their users. Set a budget and get your community manager out on the road. Set public events where the most active emotionally invested users can personally get to know this individual face to face.

Town hall meetings are great. Use your corporate offices all over the world as much as possible to host get togethers, etc. People that work for your company will be encouraged to attend because it’s easy for them (at their office already) and people that love your product will consider it a wonderful experience to get to see your offices first hand. It’s also easier to get management to stop by for an hour for a meet and greet if they don’t have to drive somewhere specifically.

5. Authorize transparency. You will never be able to please everyone in your community. You will always have people who hate things that you do. Don’t shy away from these problems and issues. Keep the lawyers as far away from the community managers as possible. Be open and comunicative even if it means telling people something that they don’t want to hear. Err on the side of being too transparent over withholding information. If there is some reason why information can’t be shared, explain the reasoning behind that.

6. Acknowledge your critics. Critics of a service should never be marginalized or dismissed or certainly locked out of help forums or censored. Critics can be a pain in the ass, they can create discord in your community, they can hurt esprit de corps. But… oftentimes their points are valid. They document real problems and bugs. They challenge your service or product to be the most excellent that it possibly can be. One of the highest ambitions a good community manager should have is to turn a critic into an evangelist. There is no greater accomplishment in my mind or measure of the success of a community manager.

7. Act immediately. Nothing creates a worse problem than letting an issue fester over time. And internet time moves fast. In 24 hours a community problem can easily move outside of your community and be significantly amplified across the web. Digg, reddit, Slashdot, Twitter, blogs, etc. are very quick to latch on to community problems. Nip your community problems in the bud. Immediately address them, even if the address is simply that you need more time.

Recently Starbucks decided to launch a social media beachhead on Flickr. This was probably not the best idea as Starbucks historically has had a less than good reputation for prohibiting photography in their stores. But rather than deal with this conflict immediately, Starbucks let this issue fester on and on and on for months. Users in their Flickr group got so upset about Starbuck’s inability to address this problem over the months that almost every thread kept bringing this failure up over and over and over again. Finally Starbuck’s was forced to lock down the entire group. Effectively censoring all who had participated. Had Starbucks come up with a faster solution to this problem this failure could have been avoided.

8. Monitor all channels for your product. Recently when I updated my CoolIris/Firefox I found that cmd-click would no longer open a new background tab. This was frustrating to me as a user because it was a change that I wasn’t used to and made it much harder for me to use that product. So I tweeted out that I disliked this. Within hours someone from Cool Iris tweeted back an easy solution to my problem and I tweeted back that they were the Bestest after that. They turned a very negative feeling I had about their product into a very positive feeling. Good community managers should not just monitor their own community. They should monitor what is being said about their community outside their community. Twitter, facebook, FriendFeed, etc. And while the eyes of a community manager cannot be everywhere at all times, all employees of a company should be empowered to forward things that they find out there to the community manager.

9. Promote, promote, promote, promote. A good community manager’s fingers should be blistered by the end of the day from hitting the like button over and over and over and over again. Give praise to the most prominent members of your community religiously. Acknowledge them even in the smallest of ways. Build them up. These are your evangelists. These are your ambassadors. These users provide you a tool to leverage good vibrations. They broadcast and spread your message of product excellence. Let them feel the love.

30 Comments

  1. [...] Thoughts on Community Management | Thomas Hawk Digital Connection [...]

  2. [...] Thoughts on Community Management | Thomas Hawk Digital Connection [...]

  3. laura says:

    I agree with much of this. That said, I heard a new favorite phrase at sxsw this year: Free Speech Fallacy (or the fallacy of free speech)
    I’d hope you use a bit more care in your choice of language in such a well-thought out post as this.

    I agree pains should be taken with regards to removing content or limiting the type of posts allowed. My community is not your democracy however, and throwing around words like “censorship” in this atmosphere weakens its legitimate political meaning. Removing comments connected to a piece of content (likely also tied in the db) is *not* censorship. And subjective judgment must be used with regards to content and community Guidelines, again, not censorship.

  4. [...] Thoughts on Community Management. One of the best general blog posts about tending an online space we’ve read in a long time. Superb.  [...]

  5. Kamotho says:

    Amazing and brilliant we have built this site through ning with a membership of 200 people and invitation of over 23000 invitation.
    Thank You.

  6. Thomas Hawk says:

    so it sounds a lot like buzz. I wonder if they will have censors there like they do at Flickr to make sure that people don't post things like pictures of paintings from museums or public sculpture from Beverly Hills. Or photos of mannequins or stuff.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  7. either way, it requires going into Yahoo! Mail…. and lord knows what that means… :/

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  8. haha that whole thing pissed you off huh? @Thomas Hawk

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  9. Eric P says:

    I'm still kind of baffled why these companies think that email address book = social network. Maybe it was back in the 90's, but these days email is a dumping ground for automatic notifications and not much else. Actual social communication happens elsewhere.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  10. i think google thought they would try it. it went over ok. not great, little bit of a privacy backlash, which they fixed. perhaps this is an attempt to act like google, since they seem to rock and roll with everything they do?

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  11. Eric Souza says:

    Eric P, even Twitter and Facebook will trawl through your email address book for social acquaintances. It's a starting point, not the very definition of your entire social network.

    But I think the reason why Google and Yahoo want to anchor to email is not because of your address book so much as it is to give you a home base you're already familiar with and to tie it to an online identity that you already use regularly.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  12. Jason ON says:

    I thought Yahoo already had this service called me.me?

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  13. Thomas Hawk says:

    I think for the average regular old user a social network can be a lonely place. Unless you are active there's not much to see there and it's boring. If you're facebook you have critical mass and people out there campaigning their friends onto the site.

    For a new social network you have to worry about how to make a good first impression. How to show people something that they might find value in. Chances are that at least some of the people in your address book are friends that you'd like to engage in a social network. So by using that as a starting point you give them an immediate experience.

    Of course with all the privacy backlash these days you have to worry that negative PR over both real and perceived privacy issues might counteract any benefit you get from an immediate experience for people.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  14. Thomas Hawk says:

    to me this is just another desperation move on Yahoo's part though. Bartz is failing. The stock price is underperforming both her competitors and the overall tech market. Yahoo user engagement is down. The web moves at a super fast pace and Yahoo moves slowly. Their customer service sucks and they seem to be in this 10 year funk where idiotic ideas like "everybody just needs to wear purple" are spawned only to crash and burn. This recent $100 million advert campaign about how the web is under new management "you," is hollow and in direct conflict with how they actually treat their customers. It's a huge waste of shareholder money.

    What's more their PR agency has been failing them for years as well. They just allow Yahoo to get beaten up over and over and over again and they don't do anything to try and make the situation better. They should fire Outcast and hire Edelman. They understand social media a lot better than Outcast. Instead of wasting money on $100 million ad campaigns or $50 million CEO pay packages, they should instead focus on getting back to the basics. How to best engage a community and develop a healthy respect between users, their content, and Yahoo.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  15. Adam Sweet says:

    I'm a little confused by this. Haven't they had this "social network" thing for a couple years? What's new about this idea?

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  16. Thomas Hawk says:

    Jason, I don't think me.me really took off. I have no idea what this is all about, but the press is reporting on it like it's something new coming from them.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  17. Eric P says:

    Yahoo has launched and shuttered more social networks than I can count or even remember at this point. There was 360, Mash, MyBlogLog which withered on the vine….

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  18. Adam Sweet says:

    MyBlogLog is what I was thinking about. They do like to fart around, don't they? Well, if you have more money than you know what to do with it makes sense. I just wish they'd get their shit together as Google has

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  19. Jason ON says:

    @Thomas Hawk — how'd you get the hyperlink in the comment like that?

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  20. Thomas Hawk says:

    Jason, just click on the "insert Link" button when you are making a new buzz post and it will automatically pull the link as well as potential images from the linked source in for you.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  21. Jason ON says:

    I know that, @Thomas Hawk, but in the comments section your "me.me" is hyperlinked and so in mine. I wonder, does Buzz automatically make .com's into hyperlinks in the comment section?

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  22. Thomas Hawk says:

    Ah Jason, yeah, that. I think buzz probably just automatically hyperlinks url addresses.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  23. Yahoo has certainly been floundering for the past decade. They've never recovered from the emergence of Google. I can't imagine they'll survive another 10 years without being ingested by Microsoft or another large company.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  24. Mac Beach says:

    Great, we need limitless numbers of social networks. Having only one, be it Facebook, Myspace or Google would be a disaster. With lots of them though there should eventually come better "open" interfaces that allow them to talk to one another in some common language, not the "facebook language" or "yahoo language" but an open system of conventions so that people can use the interface they prefer but still be connected to everyone they desire.

    Of course none of these companies will go there without being dragged kicking and screaming the whole way.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

  25. @Mac You can have thousands of social networks but only few of them are worth mentioning.

    This comment was originally posted on Google Buzz.buzz icon

Leave a Reply