<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Purely Anectdotal and Totally Unscientific Data on Flickr Images Being Sold by Getty Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pittsburgh events</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html/comment-page-1#comment-422799</link>
		<dc:creator>pittsburgh events</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7251#comment-422799</guid>
		<description>I’ve been wondering how successful the Flickr/Getty program was. Sounds like it can be worthwhile</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been wondering how successful the Flickr/Getty program was. Sounds like it can be worthwhile</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas sabo jewellery box</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html/comment-page-1#comment-394672</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas sabo jewellery box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 03:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7251#comment-394672</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for writing this. It touched my heart. I was unable to sleep because my fears woke me up. I think I can rest now that I know I am not alone. God has a way of making all things right. I am so thankful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for writing this. It touched my heart. I was unable to sleep because my fears woke me up. I think I can rest now that I know I am not alone. God has a way of making all things right. I am so thankful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html/comment-page-1#comment-146712</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7251#comment-146712</guid>
		<description>HaHaHAHA - Getty is a rip.  Locking up good photography for two years at a time, and for what?  ... For an average of $31.03 an image.  

... More money in the fine photography market, 1, just ONE, buy there nets double and up.  And good photography there doesn&#039;t lose it&#039;s respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HaHaHAHA &#8211; Getty is a rip.  Locking up good photography for two years at a time, and for what?  &#8230; For an average of $31.03 an image.  </p>
<p>&#8230; More money in the fine photography market, 1, just ONE, buy there nets double and up.  And good photography there doesn&#8217;t lose it&#8217;s respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffPHenderson</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html/comment-page-1#comment-140127</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffPHenderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7251#comment-140127</guid>
		<description>Thomas, thanks for researching and compiling these statistics.  I&#039;ve been wondering how successful the Flickr/Getty program was.  Sounds like it can be worthwhile if you have enough images.  20-30% payout is WAY too low in my opinion though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas, thanks for researching and compiling these statistics.  I&#8217;ve been wondering how successful the Flickr/Getty program was.  Sounds like it can be worthwhile if you have enough images.  20-30% payout is WAY too low in my opinion though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some Purely Anectdotal and Totally Unscientific Data on Flickr Images Being Sold by Getty Images &#124; Thomas Hawk Digital Connection &#124; The Click</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html/comment-page-1#comment-140120</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Purely Anectdotal and Totally Unscientific Data on Flickr Images Being Sold by Getty Images &#124; Thomas Hawk Digital Connection &#124; The Click</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7251#comment-140120</guid>
		<description>[...]   Over at the Getty Images Contributor Group on Flickr (it’s private and you have to be an accepted Flickr/Getty photographer in order to see it) there have been a number of threads started over the past few months where Getty/Flickr contributors have posted and shared basic information about how their sales are going through the Flickr/Getty partnership thus far. While it is probably far too early to accurately ascertain a lot of the statistics on how things are truly going, I thought I’d compile some of this information as anecdotal. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Over at the Getty Images Contributor Group on Flickr (it’s private and you have to be an accepted Flickr/Getty photographer in order to see it) there have been a number of threads started over the past few months where Getty/Flickr contributors have posted and shared basic information about how their sales are going through the Flickr/Getty partnership thus far. While it is probably far too early to accurately ascertain a lot of the statistics on how things are truly going, I thought I’d compile some of this information as anecdotal. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Sharon Pruitt (Pink Sherbet Photography)</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html/comment-page-1#comment-140099</link>
		<dc:creator>D Sharon Pruitt (Pink Sherbet Photography)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7251#comment-140099</guid>
		<description>I love statistics! Glad you took the time to figure them out. Interesting reading, I enjoyed your article. See you &#039;round :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love statistics! Glad you took the time to figure them out. Interesting reading, I enjoyed your article. See you &#8217;round <img src='http://thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Goldman (pixability)</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html/comment-page-1#comment-140094</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Goldman (pixability)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7251#comment-140094</guid>
		<description>Nice synthesis of those anecdotal stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice synthesis of those anecdotal stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey Ratcliff</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/12/some-purely-anectdotal-and-totally-unscientific-data-on-flickr-images-being-sold-by-getty-images.html/comment-page-1#comment-140090</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Ratcliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=7251#comment-140090</guid>
		<description>20% to 30% for the photographer is highway robbery.

(or maybe information super-highway robbery)

Good post Thomas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20% to 30% for the photographer is highway robbery.</p>
<p>(or maybe information super-highway robbery)</p>
<p>Good post Thomas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

