<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Walt Disney Family Museum&#8217;s No Photography Policy Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New Walt Disney Family Museum’s No Photography Policy Sucks &#8211; Thomas Hawk @ Photo News Today</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-105876</link>
		<dc:creator>The New Walt Disney Family Museum’s No Photography Policy Sucks &#8211; Thomas Hawk @ Photo News Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-105876</guid>
		<description>[...] Source and Read More:&#160;thomashawk.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More:&nbsp;thomashawk.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tullymonster</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-104777</link>
		<dc:creator>tullymonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-104777</guid>
		<description>No one is taking into account the experience of other museum goers. You guys commenting here on this blog may be semi pros with your cameras but the majority of people out there are most decidedly not. I have visited this museum. There is a lot of glass, plex, monitors and projection screens. Having flashes go off all around me while I&#039;m trying to view this stuff would annoy me greatly. As the lighting is a major component of these exhibits, a place like this is best experienced through the eye, not the lens</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is taking into account the experience of other museum goers. You guys commenting here on this blog may be semi pros with your cameras but the majority of people out there are most decidedly not. I have visited this museum. There is a lot of glass, plex, monitors and projection screens. Having flashes go off all around me while I&#8217;m trying to view this stuff would annoy me greatly. As the lighting is a major component of these exhibits, a place like this is best experienced through the eye, not the lens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knmi</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-104688</link>
		<dc:creator>knmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-104688</guid>
		<description>Count among the photography neanderthals the Seattle Art Museum and the Vancouver (B.C.) Art Gallery. The Vancouver Art Gallery even expects you to check your camera at the coat check. I left both places and they lost the revenue. Who made them the copyright police?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count among the photography neanderthals the Seattle Art Museum and the Vancouver (B.C.) Art Gallery. The Vancouver Art Gallery even expects you to check your camera at the coat check. I left both places and they lost the revenue. Who made them the copyright police?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt Disney Family Museum opens to public &#124; Lizzie McGuire Blog</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-104594</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt Disney Family Museum opens to public &#124; Lizzie McGuire Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-104594</guid>
		<description>[...] the museum is not without controversy. It&#8217;s &#8220;No Photos&#8221; policy has raised the ire of Thomas Hawk, a noted digerati from the central California region. He points out that many museums have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the museum is not without controversy. It&#8217;s &#8220;No Photos&#8221; policy has raised the ire of Thomas Hawk, a noted digerati from the central California region. He points out that many museums have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-104489</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-104489</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s stupid.  Can&#039;t imagine there&#039;s anything in there that hasn&#039;t been seen a million times already.  And, as someone else pointed out, in today&#039;s Internet age, they&#039;re actually missing out on the ability to generate publicity and awareness.  Then again, since they&#039;ve done a LOUSY job of that themselves, I guess it&#039;s clear they don&#039;t CARE about publicity and awareness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s stupid.  Can&#8217;t imagine there&#8217;s anything in there that hasn&#8217;t been seen a million times already.  And, as someone else pointed out, in today&#8217;s Internet age, they&#8217;re actually missing out on the ability to generate publicity and awareness.  Then again, since they&#8217;ve done a LOUSY job of that themselves, I guess it&#8217;s clear they don&#8217;t CARE about publicity and awareness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt Disney Family Museum opens to public &#8212; The Disney Blog</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-104367</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt Disney Family Museum opens to public &#8212; The Disney Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-104367</guid>
		<description>[...] the museum is not without controversy. It&#8217;s &#8220;No Photos&#8221; policy has raised the ire of Thomas Hawk, a noted digerati from the central California region. He points out that many museums have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the museum is not without controversy. It&#8217;s &#8220;No Photos&#8221; policy has raised the ire of Thomas Hawk, a noted digerati from the central California region. He points out that many museums have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-104042</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 03:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-104042</guid>
		<description>damn, how else are you going to capture a picture of someone else&#039;s art?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn, how else are you going to capture a picture of someone else&#8217;s art?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disney Family Museum&#8217;s sucky no-photos policy &#124; Newsblog</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-103768</link>
		<dc:creator>Disney Family Museum&#8217;s sucky no-photos policy &#124; Newsblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 18:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-103768</guid>
		<description>[...] The New Walt Disney Family Museum&#8217;s No Photography Policy Sucks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New Walt Disney Family Museum&#8217;s No Photography Policy Sucks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecil Tracey</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-103641</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecil Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-103641</guid>
		<description>I have enjoyed photography as a hobby for 50+years. I own a Canon 20D and am a Scott Kelby fan. He is a great photoshop expert, yet emphasizes the importance of getting the best possible shot when taking the picture, to make your time in photoshop more enjoyable.The information here is incredible...Thanks a lot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have enjoyed photography as a hobby for 50+years. I own a Canon 20D and am a Scott Kelby fan. He is a great photoshop expert, yet emphasizes the importance of getting the best possible shot when taking the picture, to make your time in photoshop more enjoyable.The information here is incredible&#8230;Thanks a lot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/10/the-new-walt-disney-family-museums-no-photography-policy-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-103426</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 01:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6968#comment-103426</guid>
		<description>As a hugh Disney fan, I too am saddened by the decision to not allow photos to be taken at the Disney Family Museum. I had talked with my wife and daughter about making the trip just to see the artifacts of the man we have come to love so much. But it would be like going to see Grandpa, and not being able to take that much cherished family photo. No thanks, Disney Family Museum, for now I&#039;ll stay home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a hugh Disney fan, I too am saddened by the decision to not allow photos to be taken at the Disney Family Museum. I had talked with my wife and daughter about making the trip just to see the artifacts of the man we have come to love so much. But it would be like going to see Grandpa, and not being able to take that much cherished family photo. No thanks, Disney Family Museum, for now I&#8217;ll stay home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

