<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FOIA Request for Emails Related to the Official Whitehouse Flickr Photostream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2009/09/foia-request-for-emails-related-to-the-official-whitehouse-flickr-photostream.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/09/foia-request-for-emails-related-to-the-official-whitehouse-flickr-photostream.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PublicRecordsGuy</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/09/foia-request-for-emails-related-to-the-official-whitehouse-flickr-photostream.html/comment-page-1#comment-97118</link>
		<dc:creator>PublicRecordsGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6846#comment-97118</guid>
		<description>@Peter James Zielinski, TH status as a rep of the press would only deal with the fee exemption and priority processing. Regardless, he&#039;s ENTITLED to the public records under FOIA. You don&#039;t even have to provide your name. Public records are exactly that, PUBLIC. Whether he gets the information he&#039;s seeking and whether it&#039;s timely will be the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter James Zielinski, TH status as a rep of the press would only deal with the fee exemption and priority processing. Regardless, he&#8217;s ENTITLED to the public records under FOIA. You don&#8217;t even have to provide your name. Public records are exactly that, PUBLIC. Whether he gets the information he&#8217;s seeking and whether it&#8217;s timely will be the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter James Zielinski</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/09/foia-request-for-emails-related-to-the-official-whitehouse-flickr-photostream.html/comment-page-1#comment-96613</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter James Zielinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6846#comment-96613</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, TH.  I really don&#039;t think writing this blog qualifies you to act as a representative of the press when asking for documents.

But best of luck in the crusade!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, TH.  I really don&#8217;t think writing this blog qualifies you to act as a representative of the press when asking for documents.</p>
<p>But best of luck in the crusade!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/09/foia-request-for-emails-related-to-the-official-whitehouse-flickr-photostream.html/comment-page-1#comment-96505</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis Freeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6846#comment-96505</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that you are going to find anything, but it will be amazing if you do.  A mini-Flickr scandal for handing out political favors.  More than likely it was a Flickr employee or a political groupie who banned him over it to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that you are going to find anything, but it will be amazing if you do.  A mini-Flickr scandal for handing out political favors.  More than likely it was a Flickr employee or a political groupie who banned him over it to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Photography Live &#187; FOIA Request for Emails Related to the Official Whitehouse Flickr Photostream</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/09/foia-request-for-emails-related-to-the-official-whitehouse-flickr-photostream.html/comment-page-1#comment-96475</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Photography Live &#187; FOIA Request for Emails Related to the Official Whitehouse Flickr Photostream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6846#comment-96475</guid>
		<description>[...] more: FOIA Request for Emails Related to the Official Whitehouse Flickr Photostream    Share this on del.icio.usDigg this!Post this on DiigoShare this on RedditBuzz up!Stumble upon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more: FOIA Request for Emails Related to the Official Whitehouse Flickr Photostream    Share this on del.icio.usDigg this!Post this on DiigoShare this on RedditBuzz up!Stumble upon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PublicRecordsGuy</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/09/foia-request-for-emails-related-to-the-official-whitehouse-flickr-photostream.html/comment-page-1#comment-96471</link>
		<dc:creator>PublicRecordsGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6846#comment-96471</guid>
		<description>In terms of disclosing the &quot;purpose&quot; of your request, you should be careful. If the information is sought for possible litigation, anticipated litigation, etc. it could serve to be an exemption to the release of information. Give them as little as possible and I definitely recommend searching the CREW and Judicial Watch websites to see how they have FOIA&#039;d the Executive Office of The White House and had to actually follow through with litigation to get those public records. If you model your requests after theirs, you&#039;ll set yourself up for easier litigation if you need to follow through with it. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of disclosing the &#8220;purpose&#8221; of your request, you should be careful. If the information is sought for possible litigation, anticipated litigation, etc. it could serve to be an exemption to the release of information. Give them as little as possible and I definitely recommend searching the CREW and Judicial Watch websites to see how they have FOIA&#8217;d the Executive Office of The White House and had to actually follow through with litigation to get those public records. If you model your requests after theirs, you&#8217;ll set yourself up for easier litigation if you need to follow through with it. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

