<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr Censors Political Image Critical of President Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stacey</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-116176</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-116176</guid>
		<description>I do find it rather upsetting that flicker removed the photo, yes it is there site and when you post -anything- on there site it is subject to change or removal, and I do not particularly think that the photo was removed do to any &#039;pro-obama&#039; bias or such, but more because they saw the amount of views and wanted to remove the photo and not risk any sort of &#039;problem&#039; that might have arrived from the photo. And that seems to have bitten them right in the ass. I do think that flicker is obviously restricting the users freedom of speech and undoubtedly that of other users. And in a time like now, when we have the first black president and are fighting a war Flicker seems to want to avoid and political bru-ha-ha, which again has bitten them in the ass. Flicker is also the first photo/social networking sight that i have heard of removing such images. I know a rather large number of people who have posted anti-obama photos and who have even made entire profiles dedicated to nobama-ism and they have not been removed. the fact of the matter is yes it might be offencive to some (certainly NOT to me) but some people find obama himself offencive. if someone is aloud to post pro-anything images then people MUST be aloud to post anti-anything images. thats just the way freedom of speech works. some people like something some dont and they both let people know. not to allow someone to do so is well, an infringement on the first amendment and democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do find it rather upsetting that flicker removed the photo, yes it is there site and when you post -anything- on there site it is subject to change or removal, and I do not particularly think that the photo was removed do to any &#8216;pro-obama&#8217; bias or such, but more because they saw the amount of views and wanted to remove the photo and not risk any sort of &#8216;problem&#8217; that might have arrived from the photo. And that seems to have bitten them right in the ass. I do think that flicker is obviously restricting the users freedom of speech and undoubtedly that of other users. And in a time like now, when we have the first black president and are fighting a war Flicker seems to want to avoid and political bru-ha-ha, which again has bitten them in the ass. Flicker is also the first photo/social networking sight that i have heard of removing such images. I know a rather large number of people who have posted anti-obama photos and who have even made entire profiles dedicated to nobama-ism and they have not been removed. the fact of the matter is yes it might be offencive to some (certainly NOT to me) but some people find obama himself offencive. if someone is aloud to post pro-anything images then people MUST be aloud to post anti-anything images. thats just the way freedom of speech works. some people like something some dont and they both let people know. not to allow someone to do so is well, an infringement on the first amendment and democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Estamos indefensos en la nube? &#171; vcarazo</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-113646</link>
		<dc:creator>Estamos indefensos en la nube? &#171; vcarazo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-113646</guid>
		<description>[...] ha censurado una foto de un usuario porque  Obama aparecía como si fuese Jocker. Esa foto ha dado mucho que hablar sobre todo porque la han usado para hacer unos posters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ha censurado una foto de un usuario porque  Obama aparecía como si fuese Jocker. Esa foto ha dado mucho que hablar sobre todo porque la han usado para hacer unos posters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flickr zensiert jetzt nur noch ein bisschen &#124; Basic Thinking Blog</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-109496</link>
		<dc:creator>Flickr zensiert jetzt nur noch ein bisschen &#124; Basic Thinking Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-109496</guid>
		<description>[...] Thomas Hawk, dessen Laden in Konkurrenz zu Flickr l&#228;uft: Pfui, Spinne! Zensur!, schrieb er auf seinem Blog. Flickr entfernt Bilder von andersdenkenden Menschen, lautete der [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thomas Hawk, dessen Laden in Konkurrenz zu Flickr l&#228;uft: Pfui, Spinne! Zensur!, schrieb er auf seinem Blog. Flickr entfernt Bilder von andersdenkenden Menschen, lautete der [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » Lessons from the trials and tribulations of Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-100977</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » Lessons from the trials and tribulations of Yahoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-100977</guid>
		<description>[...] notice, adding that “We very much value freedom of speech and creativity.” Thomas Hawk had a good overview of all the gory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notice, adding that “We very much value freedom of speech and creativity.” Thomas Hawk had a good overview of all the gory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo Brands Flickr; Users Retaliate &#124; Filme Gratis Filme Moca</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-100933</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo Brands Flickr; Users Retaliate &#124; Filme Gratis Filme Moca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-100933</guid>
		<description>[...] notice, adding that “We very much value freedom of speech and creativity.” Thomas Hawk had a good overview of all the gory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notice, adding that “We very much value freedom of speech and creativity.” Thomas Hawk had a good overview of all the gory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mash123 &#187; Yahoo Brands Flickr; Users Retaliate</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-100814</link>
		<dc:creator>Mash123 &#187; Yahoo Brands Flickr; Users Retaliate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-100814</guid>
		<description>[...] “We very &amp;#109&amp;#117&amp;#99h value freedom of speech and creativity.” Thoma&amp;#115&amp;#32&amp;#72awk had a good overview of all the gory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “We very &amp;#109&amp;#117&amp;#99h value freedom of speech and creativity.” Thoma&amp;#115&amp;#32&amp;#72awk had a good overview of all the gory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo Brands Flickr; Users Retaliate</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-100780</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo Brands Flickr; Users Retaliate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-100780</guid>
		<description>[...] notice, adding that “We very much value freedom of speech and creativity.” Thomas Hawk had a good overview of all the gory [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notice, adding that “We very much value freedom of speech and creativity.” Thomas Hawk had a good overview of all the gory [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Censorship or Copyright Infringement? Flickr Takes Down &#8220;Obama as Joker&#8221; Photo &#171; Second Verse&#8230;Same as the First</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-99961</link>
		<dc:creator>Censorship or Copyright Infringement? Flickr Takes Down &#8220;Obama as Joker&#8221; Photo &#171; Second Verse&#8230;Same as the First</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-99961</guid>
		<description>[...] political parody in fact, protected as a form of free speech? Noted photographer and blogger Thomas Hawk thinks it is, citing a precedent for fair use (Folsom v Marsh) which states &#8216;if you produce [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] political parody in fact, protected as a form of free speech? Noted photographer and blogger Thomas Hawk thinks it is, citing a precedent for fair use (Folsom v Marsh) which states &#8216;if you produce [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freedom Time: Google&#8217;s Letter to the FCC, App Stores &#38; Mobile Gatekeepers &#171; Cloud Four</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-99448</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom Time: Google&#8217;s Letter to the FCC, App Stores &#38; Mobile Gatekeepers &#171; Cloud Four</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-99448</guid>
		<description>[...] Flickr received a lot of scrutiny and pressure because of perceived censorship of a political image. The image showed a modified version of Obama on the cover of Time Magazine where Obama was made to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flickr received a lot of scrutiny and pressure because of perceived censorship of a political image. The image showed a modified version of Obama on the cover of Time Magazine where Obama was made to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Website or iphone App? &#171; Stuart Gleave</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/08/flickr-censors-political-image-critical-of-president-obama.html/comment-page-1#comment-93226</link>
		<dc:creator>Mobile Website or iphone App? &#171; Stuart Gleave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6690#comment-93226</guid>
		<description>[...] Spotify, you&#8217;re fun and all but flickr and i go way back. Back to the days before the political DMCA takedowns, before the introduction of video and subsequent backlash&#8230; even before yahoo got all crazy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spotify, you&#8217;re fun and all but flickr and i go way back. Back to the days before the political DMCA takedowns, before the introduction of video and subsequent backlash&#8230; even before yahoo got all crazy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
