<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Doesn&#8217;t Think People In India Should Be Allowed to Search for the Term &#8220;Sex&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: r4ds</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-597254</link>
		<dc:creator>r4ds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-597254</guid>
		<description>For all the Google lovers :- Google is no hero when it comes to censorship – they bent over backwards in China. If they really believed in ‘Do no evil’ they should have stood their ground and fought for freedom of the interet.
Alas, search share is the #1 goal for Google, and the motto of ‘Do no evil’ is no longer true with Google.

And, just because Google is serving up responses that show scant respect to local laws, every other corporate should not be expect to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the Google lovers :- Google is no hero when it comes to censorship – they bent over backwards in China. If they really believed in ‘Do no evil’ they should have stood their ground and fought for freedom of the interet.<br />
Alas, search share is the #1 goal for Google, and the motto of ‘Do no evil’ is no longer true with Google.</p>
<p>And, just because Google is serving up responses that show scant respect to local laws, every other corporate should not be expect to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajaaay</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-274962</link>
		<dc:creator>ajaaay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-274962</guid>
		<description>restrictions, how would your life change if you where not able to watch porn, will not be able to eat?, will you move to another country?, will you not be alble to live without induling in porn and then accusing those who restrict the internet that they are encourging rape!!...People its this mentality we need to elimite, nothing wrong with sex, but to broadcast hardcore porn, with no restriction availble to any child, that show vulger and disgusting images, humilating and degrading both men and women...IS THIS ENTERTAINMENT ?..is this entertainment goin to affect children ??..WILL you as a parent having watched porn on the net and knowing the vulger imagery be COMFORTABLE ALLOWING YOUR OWN CHILDREN ACCESS..?? do we not want to create an india, that actually has real pride, real love, real integrity, a happy, healthy, prosperous land both in body and mind......if we do then we have to start with our children and what they are being shown. Would anyone allow a boy of 13 years old to view porn and then defend that action with freedom of information, without seeing the bigger picture of the crass, shallow, negative culture it will breed.!!...you want to make a change....then start erasing and restricting VULGER images from the homes of children, men and women.....and by doing that the consiousness of the people will be tweaked into making that realistion that internet restriction is REQUIRED when anything and everything can be seen or accessed that is harmfull to the mind and body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>restrictions, how would your life change if you where not able to watch porn, will not be able to eat?, will you move to another country?, will you not be alble to live without induling in porn and then accusing those who restrict the internet that they are encourging rape!!&#8230;People its this mentality we need to elimite, nothing wrong with sex, but to broadcast hardcore porn, with no restriction availble to any child, that show vulger and disgusting images, humilating and degrading both men and women&#8230;IS THIS ENTERTAINMENT ?..is this entertainment goin to affect children ??..WILL you as a parent having watched porn on the net and knowing the vulger imagery be COMFORTABLE ALLOWING YOUR OWN CHILDREN ACCESS..?? do we not want to create an india, that actually has real pride, real love, real integrity, a happy, healthy, prosperous land both in body and mind&#8230;&#8230;if we do then we have to start with our children and what they are being shown. Would anyone allow a boy of 13 years old to view porn and then defend that action with freedom of information, without seeing the bigger picture of the crass, shallow, negative culture it will breed.!!&#8230;you want to make a change&#8230;.then start erasing and restricting VULGER images from the homes of children, men and women&#8230;..and by doing that the consiousness of the people will be tweaked into making that realistion that internet restriction is REQUIRED when anything and everything can be seen or accessed that is harmfull to the mind and body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedAct</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-146217</link>
		<dc:creator>RedAct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-146217</guid>
		<description>Purely out of scientific interest, I scrolled through all the country/region settings on Bing where &#039;sex&#039; is banned, and this is how it stacks up:

India
Arabian countries
Singapore
China / Hong Kong
Indonesia
Malaysia
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey

(Couldn&#039;t figure out Korea, though -- I&#039;m sure they are OK with sex).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purely out of scientific interest, I scrolled through all the country/region settings on Bing where &#8216;sex&#8217; is banned, and this is how it stacks up:</p>
<p>India<br />
Arabian countries<br />
Singapore<br />
China / Hong Kong<br />
Indonesia<br />
Malaysia<br />
Taiwan<br />
Thailand<br />
Turkey</p>
<p>(Couldn&#8217;t figure out Korea, though &#8212; I&#8217;m sure they are OK with sex).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eighthwonder</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-84777</link>
		<dc:creator>eighthwonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-84777</guid>
		<description>i stumbled up on bing last week, added it and dumped it after two minutes after i typed &quot;pornography&quot; in search box and it turned up blank...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i stumbled up on bing last week, added it and dumped it after two minutes after i typed &#8220;pornography&#8221; in search box and it turned up blank&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishwas</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-75294</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishwas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-75294</guid>
		<description>Better i should continue using google then.. . Atleast it proves that Bing is useless for doctors. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better i should continue using google then.. . Atleast it proves that Bing is useless for doctors. <img src='http://thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-62824</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-62824</guid>
		<description>found this: http://help.live.com/help.aspx?project=wl_searchv1&amp;market=en-US&amp;querytype=keyword&amp;query=hcraesefas&amp;tmt=&amp;domain=www.bing.com:80

There are three safe search options that filter the sexually explicit content from the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>found this: <a href="http://help.live.com/help.aspx?project=wl_searchv1&#038;market=en-US&#038;querytype=keyword&#038;query=hcraesefas&#038;tmt=&#038;domain=www.bing.com:80" rel="nofollow">http://help.live.com/help.aspx?project=wl_searchv1&#038;market=en-US&#038;querytype=keyword&#038;query=hcraesefas&#038;tmt=&#038;domain=www.bing.com:80</a></p>
<p>There are three safe search options that filter the sexually explicit content from the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-59445</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-59445</guid>
		<description>Oh and on the subject &quot;google is evil too&quot;

learn to differentiate betwen &quot;legal requirement&quot; and &quot;non obligatory censor&quot;.

yea, thats two totaly different things, legal requiremnts are met or you are in trouble, that simple. Not nice but thats how all country handle it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and on the subject &#8220;google is evil too&#8221;</p>
<p>learn to differentiate betwen &#8220;legal requirement&#8221; and &#8220;non obligatory censor&#8221;.</p>
<p>yea, thats two totaly different things, legal requiremnts are met or you are in trouble, that simple. Not nice but thats how all country handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-59443</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-59443</guid>
		<description>They even cencor it for Germany, in a country that does not only allow prostitution but also has laws how to &quot;do it&quot; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They even cencor it for Germany, in a country that does not only allow prostitution but also has laws how to &#8220;do it&#8221; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: googleGuy</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-57598</link>
		<dc:creator>googleGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-57598</guid>
		<description>may be they couldn&#039;t figure out what to display for that search, it returns so many results..
and now they have an excuse!

Welcome to MS world, &quot;Crap is inevitable&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may be they couldn&#8217;t figure out what to display for that search, it returns so many results..<br />
and now they have an excuse!</p>
<p>Welcome to MS world, &#8220;Crap is inevitable&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VS</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/06/microsoft-doesnt-think-people-in-india-should-be-allowed-to-search-for-the-term-sex.html/comment-page-1#comment-57387</link>
		<dc:creator>VS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6428#comment-57387</guid>
		<description>This is quite a fascinating article - why blame Microsoft for following Indian laws, or those of any other country? If there is any concern of censorship it should be raised with the indian government. Pointing fingers at Microsoft for adhering to the law of the land is unfair.

For all the Google lovers :- Google is no hero when it comes to censorship - they bent over backwards in China. If they really believed in &#039;Do no evil&#039; they should have stood their ground and fought for freedom of the interet. 
Alas, search share is the #1 goal for Google, and the motto of &#039;Do no evil&#039; is no longer true with Google.

And, just because Google is serving up responses that show scant respect to local laws, every other corporate should not be expect to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite a fascinating article &#8211; why blame Microsoft for following Indian laws, or those of any other country? If there is any concern of censorship it should be raised with the indian government. Pointing fingers at Microsoft for adhering to the law of the land is unfair.</p>
<p>For all the Google lovers :- Google is no hero when it comes to censorship &#8211; they bent over backwards in China. If they really believed in &#8216;Do no evil&#8217; they should have stood their ground and fought for freedom of the interet.<br />
Alas, search share is the #1 goal for Google, and the motto of &#8216;Do no evil&#8217; is no longer true with Google.</p>
<p>And, just because Google is serving up responses that show scant respect to local laws, every other corporate should not be expect to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

