<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey SF Muni Fare Inspector #32, Photography is Not a Crime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenton</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-443240</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 01:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-443240</guid>
		<description>I understand the concept of Muni personnel checking the various transit options (one-day Passport, three-day Passport, seven-day Passport, A Premium inclusive of (BART usage), CityPass, Disabled, Lifeline, M Muni-Only exclusive of (BART usage), Senior, Translink/Clipper and Youth for proof of payment.
 
My only disagreement is with my trial usage of TransLink/Clipper card.  Muni fare inspectors inform that their handheld card reader can’t verify its validity through plastic cardholder because it is not comparable to the TransLink/Clipper card readers on coaches.  That is not the passengers’ fault.  Customers have to remove their TransLink/Clipper for validity.  Make handheld card reader comparable to actual TransLink/Clipper card readers. 
 
I find this very intrusive and inconvenience.  All the sources below do not indicate that customers have to remove their TransLink/Clipper® card from anything for validity.  Customers place their TransLink/Clipper cards into holders to protect the card from the elements.  A loose TransLink/Clipper card in a pocket, hip pocket, back pocket and purse is subject to being lost.
 
Source: proper translink card storage.pdf
 
See page 2 of the following web-link regarding proper storage of TransLink (Clipper).
 
http://www.translink.org/TranslinkWeb/muni/downloads/SFMTA_RTC_Booklet.pdf
 
All of the above transit options exclusive of TransLink/Clipper can be displayed (flash) with no action taken (for validity) by the holders.  I would rather tag the vehicle TransLink/Clipper card reader again to indicate the TransLink/Clipper card was already processed.  There should be equality among the transit options.
 
Free Translink® cards for all Muni customers!
 
Source: http://www.sfmta.com/cms/mfares/TransLink.htm
 
Clipper® users must tag their cards when entering the fare gates at Muni Metro stations or when boarding a Muni bus, streetcar or light rail vehicle.  Muni fare inspectors or other authorized personnel may request a customer’s Clipper® card to verify its validity.  POP--Muni fare inspectors or other authorized personnel may issue citations to customers who fail to display valid proof of payment upon request.  Source:  Available at all transit shelters with transit maps.
 
Should I ask for a transfer when I board a Muni vehicle? How can I prove that I paid? 
 
TransLink will automatically calculate the 90-minute transfer period on Muni, so you are not required to carry a paper transfer. You must tag your card each time you transfer and enter a vehicle so that the card reader can confirm the transfer period is still in effect. The card reader will beep and show a green light to indicate that your transfer is valid. Transit fare inspectors have handheld card readers and conduct random checks of TransLink customers to ensure that they have tagged their cards properly. The handheld card reader only confirms that you have proper payment; it does not affect your card balance. 
 
Source: 
http://www.translink.org/TranslinkWeb/muni/faq.do;jsessionid=4F32DAA1CA0EAB27ECD58321584D4813
 
SECTION 7.2.101. FARE EVASION REGULATIONS.
(a) For any passenger or other person in or about any public transit station (including an outdoor high-level boarding platform or station operated by the Bay Area Rapid Transit District), streetcar, cable car, motor coach, trolley coach or other public transit vehicle to evade any fare collection system or proof of payment program instituted by the Municipal Transportation Agency.
(b) For any person to board or ride a streetcar, motor coach, trolley coach without prior or concurrent payment of fare.
(c) For any person to board a streetcar, motor coach, trolley coach through the rear exit except: (i) when a representative of the transit system is present at such exit for the collection of fares or transfers or the inspection for proof of payment; (ii) when the streetcar, motor coach, trolley coach or other transit vehicle is operating at a station or boarding platform where fares are collected prior to boarding the transit vehicle; (iii) when necessary for access by persons with disabilities on wayside boarding platforms; or (iv) when the streetcar, motor coach, or trolley coach is operating on a transit line or in a Proof of Payment Zone.
(d) To fail to display a valid fare receipt or transit pass at the request of any authorized representative of the transit system or duly authorized peace officer while on a transit vehicle or in a Proof of Payment Zone.
(e) To misuse any transfer, pass, ticket, or token with the intent to evade the payment of any fare.
(f) To knowingly use or attempt to use any illegally printed, duplicated, or otherwise reproduced token, card, transfer or other item for entry onto any transit vehicle or into any transit station with the intent of evading payment of a fare.
(g) For any unauthorized person to use a discount ticket or fail to present, upon request from a system fare inspector, acceptable proof of eligibility to use a discount ticket. (127)
(Amended by Ordinance. 287-08, File No. 081340, App. 12/5/2008)
 
Source: http://www.municode.com/content/4201/14143/HTML/ach007.html
 
What is the difference between TransLink and Clipper?
The card still works in the exact same way! Simply touch your card to the card reader to verify your pass, or deduct the fare from your cash balance.
 
The only difference is that the gold chip that is seen on the TransLink card is now an internal chip in the Clipper card.
 
https://www.translink.org/TranslinkWeb/aboutClipper.do
 
I would enter Metro stations, but not exit from Metro stations to avoid this inconvenience from transit fare inspectors.
 
Muni Regulations            Local &amp; State
 
CONDUCT PROHIBITION ON MUNI VEHICLES, PLATFORMS &amp; STATIONS
 
(Notice:  All Activity within Muni Facilities is Video Recorded)
 
•     Any Eating, Drinking, or Smoking
•      Using Skates, or Skateboarding
•      Bringing Bicycles on the Metro
•      Any Miscue of Muni Facilities
•      Any Disruptive Behavior
•      Disturbing Others with Sound Producing Devices
•      Selling Transfers/Fare Media
•      Malicious Mischief (Vandalism)
•      Transportation of Hazardous Materials
•      Loitering
•      Trespassing on Trackways
 
(T.C. 127, 128, P.C. 240, &amp; Associated Sub-Sections)
 
Proper ID Required for Discount Fare
 
Proof of Payment Required at all times
 
Source:  Posted on Metro Platform Wall
 
Customers are allowed to ride without cash payment if the Clipper reader is malfunctioning; however, transfers will not be issued.  Customers will be asked to pay cash if their Clipper card is malfunctioning or there is no value on the card.
 
Source: http://www.sfmta.com/cms/mfares/ClipperFactSheet.htm
 
This is true, if the Clipper Card reader in not working, operators are supposed to treat it the same as a broken fare box and let the patron ride for free. Upon doing so the operator is not to issue a transfer. If you should encounter this type of situation, make sure to record the bus number and please report it to 311. Also keep the bus number just incase you should encounter a problem with a proof of payment officer.
 
Source: &quot;Munipsrweb&quot; Munipsrweb@sfmta.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the concept of Muni personnel checking the various transit options (one-day Passport, three-day Passport, seven-day Passport, A Premium inclusive of (BART usage), CityPass, Disabled, Lifeline, M Muni-Only exclusive of (BART usage), Senior, Translink/Clipper and Youth for proof of payment.</p>
<p>My only disagreement is with my trial usage of TransLink/Clipper card.  Muni fare inspectors inform that their handheld card reader can’t verify its validity through plastic cardholder because it is not comparable to the TransLink/Clipper card readers on coaches.  That is not the passengers’ fault.  Customers have to remove their TransLink/Clipper for validity.  Make handheld card reader comparable to actual TransLink/Clipper card readers. </p>
<p>I find this very intrusive and inconvenience.  All the sources below do not indicate that customers have to remove their TransLink/Clipper® card from anything for validity.  Customers place their TransLink/Clipper cards into holders to protect the card from the elements.  A loose TransLink/Clipper card in a pocket, hip pocket, back pocket and purse is subject to being lost.</p>
<p>Source: proper translink card storage.pdf</p>
<p>See page 2 of the following web-link regarding proper storage of TransLink (Clipper).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.translink.org/TranslinkWeb/muni/downloads/SFMTA_RTC_Booklet.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.translink.org/TranslinkWeb/muni/downloads/SFMTA_RTC_Booklet.pdf</a></p>
<p>All of the above transit options exclusive of TransLink/Clipper can be displayed (flash) with no action taken (for validity) by the holders.  I would rather tag the vehicle TransLink/Clipper card reader again to indicate the TransLink/Clipper card was already processed.  There should be equality among the transit options.</p>
<p>Free Translink® cards for all Muni customers!</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.sfmta.com/cms/mfares/TransLink.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfmta.com/cms/mfares/TransLink.htm</a></p>
<p>Clipper® users must tag their cards when entering the fare gates at Muni Metro stations or when boarding a Muni bus, streetcar or light rail vehicle.  Muni fare inspectors or other authorized personnel may request a customer’s Clipper® card to verify its validity.  POP&#8211;Muni fare inspectors or other authorized personnel may issue citations to customers who fail to display valid proof of payment upon request.  Source:  Available at all transit shelters with transit maps.</p>
<p>Should I ask for a transfer when I board a Muni vehicle? How can I prove that I paid? </p>
<p>TransLink will automatically calculate the 90-minute transfer period on Muni, so you are not required to carry a paper transfer. You must tag your card each time you transfer and enter a vehicle so that the card reader can confirm the transfer period is still in effect. The card reader will beep and show a green light to indicate that your transfer is valid. Transit fare inspectors have handheld card readers and conduct random checks of TransLink customers to ensure that they have tagged their cards properly. The handheld card reader only confirms that you have proper payment; it does not affect your card balance. </p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://www.translink.org/TranslinkWeb/muni/faq.do;jsessionid=4F32DAA1CA0EAB27ECD58321584D4813" rel="nofollow">http://www.translink.org/TranslinkWeb/muni/faq.do;jsessionid=4F32DAA1CA0EAB27ECD58321584D4813</a></p>
<p>SECTION 7.2.101. FARE EVASION REGULATIONS.<br />
(a) For any passenger or other person in or about any public transit station (including an outdoor high-level boarding platform or station operated by the Bay Area Rapid Transit District), streetcar, cable car, motor coach, trolley coach or other public transit vehicle to evade any fare collection system or proof of payment program instituted by the Municipal Transportation Agency.<br />
(b) For any person to board or ride a streetcar, motor coach, trolley coach without prior or concurrent payment of fare.<br />
(c) For any person to board a streetcar, motor coach, trolley coach through the rear exit except: (i) when a representative of the transit system is present at such exit for the collection of fares or transfers or the inspection for proof of payment; (ii) when the streetcar, motor coach, trolley coach or other transit vehicle is operating at a station or boarding platform where fares are collected prior to boarding the transit vehicle; (iii) when necessary for access by persons with disabilities on wayside boarding platforms; or (iv) when the streetcar, motor coach, or trolley coach is operating on a transit line or in a Proof of Payment Zone.<br />
(d) To fail to display a valid fare receipt or transit pass at the request of any authorized representative of the transit system or duly authorized peace officer while on a transit vehicle or in a Proof of Payment Zone.<br />
(e) To misuse any transfer, pass, ticket, or token with the intent to evade the payment of any fare.<br />
(f) To knowingly use or attempt to use any illegally printed, duplicated, or otherwise reproduced token, card, transfer or other item for entry onto any transit vehicle or into any transit station with the intent of evading payment of a fare.<br />
(g) For any unauthorized person to use a discount ticket or fail to present, upon request from a system fare inspector, acceptable proof of eligibility to use a discount ticket. (127)<br />
(Amended by Ordinance. 287-08, File No. 081340, App. 12/5/2008)</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.municode.com/content/4201/14143/HTML/ach007.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.municode.com/content/4201/14143/HTML/ach007.html</a></p>
<p>What is the difference between TransLink and Clipper?<br />
The card still works in the exact same way! Simply touch your card to the card reader to verify your pass, or deduct the fare from your cash balance.</p>
<p>The only difference is that the gold chip that is seen on the TransLink card is now an internal chip in the Clipper card.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.translink.org/TranslinkWeb/aboutClipper.do" rel="nofollow">https://www.translink.org/TranslinkWeb/aboutClipper.do</a></p>
<p>I would enter Metro stations, but not exit from Metro stations to avoid this inconvenience from transit fare inspectors.</p>
<p>Muni Regulations            Local &amp; State</p>
<p>CONDUCT PROHIBITION ON MUNI VEHICLES, PLATFORMS &amp; STATIONS</p>
<p>(Notice:  All Activity within Muni Facilities is Video Recorded)</p>
<p>•     Any Eating, Drinking, or Smoking<br />
•      Using Skates, or Skateboarding<br />
•      Bringing Bicycles on the Metro<br />
•      Any Miscue of Muni Facilities<br />
•      Any Disruptive Behavior<br />
•      Disturbing Others with Sound Producing Devices<br />
•      Selling Transfers/Fare Media<br />
•      Malicious Mischief (Vandalism)<br />
•      Transportation of Hazardous Materials<br />
•      Loitering<br />
•      Trespassing on Trackways</p>
<p>(T.C. 127, 128, P.C. 240, &amp; Associated Sub-Sections)</p>
<p>Proper ID Required for Discount Fare</p>
<p>Proof of Payment Required at all times</p>
<p>Source:  Posted on Metro Platform Wall</p>
<p>Customers are allowed to ride without cash payment if the Clipper reader is malfunctioning; however, transfers will not be issued.  Customers will be asked to pay cash if their Clipper card is malfunctioning or there is no value on the card.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.sfmta.com/cms/mfares/ClipperFactSheet.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfmta.com/cms/mfares/ClipperFactSheet.htm</a></p>
<p>This is true, if the Clipper Card reader in not working, operators are supposed to treat it the same as a broken fare box and let the patron ride for free. Upon doing so the operator is not to issue a transfer. If you should encounter this type of situation, make sure to record the bus number and please report it to 311. Also keep the bus number just incase you should encounter a problem with a proof of payment officer.</p>
<p>Source: &#8220;Munipsrweb&#8221; <a href="mailto:Munipsrweb@sfmta.com">Munipsrweb@sfmta.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF Muni’s Crappy Response to Photographer Harassment &#124; DiGital Product Review</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-45887</link>
		<dc:creator>SF Muni’s Crappy Response to Photographer Harassment &#124; DiGital Product Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 07:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-45887</guid>
		<description>[...] f&#8206;e&#8206;w d&#8206;ay&#8206;s&#8206; a&#8206;go I b&#8206;log&#8206;g&#8206;e&#8206;d&#8206;  a&#8206;bou&#8206;t an i&#8206;nc&#8206;ident&#8206; of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] f&#8206;e&#8206;w d&#8206;ay&#8206;s&#8206; a&#8206;go I b&#8206;log&#8206;g&#8206;e&#8206;d&#8206;  a&#8206;bou&#8206;t an i&#8206;nc&#8206;ident&#8206; of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Condensed Knowledge - May 10, 2009 - Lists - Raoul Pop</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-44011</link>
		<dc:creator>Condensed Knowledge - May 10, 2009 - Lists - Raoul Pop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 09:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-44011</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey SF Muni Fare Inspector #32, Photography is Not a Crime [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey SF Muni Fare Inspector #32, Photography is Not a Crime [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey SF Muni Fare Inspector #32, Photography is Not a Crime - Thomas Hawk &#124; Photo News Today</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-43328</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey SF Muni Fare Inspector #32, Photography is Not a Crime - Thomas Hawk &#124; Photo News Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-43328</guid>
		<description>[...] Source and Read More:&#160;thomashawk.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source and Read More:&nbsp;thomashawk.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plug1</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-43298</link>
		<dc:creator>plug1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-43298</guid>
		<description>just got a response from Muni. you can read it here: http://bit.ly/lSIDg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just got a response from Muni. you can read it here: <a href="http://bit.ly/lSIDg" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/lSIDg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-43189</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-43189</guid>
		<description>I love the picture of him holding up his cell phone with the little camera lens visible.  You know that thing people use everyday to take pictures with all over the city, but of course it&#039;s not a &#039;dangerous&#039; camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the picture of him holding up his cell phone with the little camera lens visible.  You know that thing people use everyday to take pictures with all over the city, but of course it&#8217;s not a &#8216;dangerous&#8217; camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SexyNinjaMonkey</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-43032</link>
		<dc:creator>SexyNinjaMonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-43032</guid>
		<description>Recently we had an issue with Glebe police in Sydney, Australia.
We wer holding a peaceful protest outside of a scientology org, when all of a sudden like 6 police officers came along and tried to illegally move us on, stating no permit had been filed (which it had), and demanding that one of our photographers delete footage from his camera. Below are some comments from our forum...

Comment by RSG a member of our party:
&quot;In fact, the police officer said to delete any footage with police in it, as Zhent had done a sweep around of the entire street with his video camera that included us as well as the police. When questioned, the police officer said something about footage of police in uniform will jeopardise those individuals if they later want to go undercover, as it can be used to find out that they&#039;re police. He stated that any footage taken of police is illegal.&quot;

Comment of Zhent photographer in question:
&quot;I was approached and asked to delete footage from my video camera after doing some generic shots of anon and the the org, which the police happened to be standing in front of, it was not actually about the constable doing the move-along announcement.
I was informed in so many words that it is illegal to film police officers, someone else will have to fill in the exact statement here.

I of course questioned this and was told, as RSG said, that footage of police officers could potentially jeopardize them if they went undercover. I don&#039;t believe i was not quoted any exact law about this, and certainly none about required deletion of footage.

I sympathized with their statement but strongly objected to deleting the footage, knowing that I was well within my right to keep it and that being coerced to delete it would be unlawful and an abuse of photographers rights.
However the officer in question firmly persisted, and I didn&#039;t want to cause trouble (or get charged for some ridiculous offense), so I did delete the footage.

I am certainly not happy about all of this and I hope we can use this to bring an understanding to the police about the rights of photographers and the relevant police authority.&quot;

Anyway, we didn&#039;t end up moving on, but they did make us turn off the music, so we sung all our favourite tracks loudly to keep up the spirit.

We have video footage of the cops trying to move us along online here: http://vimeo.com/4232109</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently we had an issue with Glebe police in Sydney, Australia.<br />
We wer holding a peaceful protest outside of a scientology org, when all of a sudden like 6 police officers came along and tried to illegally move us on, stating no permit had been filed (which it had), and demanding that one of our photographers delete footage from his camera. Below are some comments from our forum&#8230;</p>
<p>Comment by RSG a member of our party:<br />
&#8220;In fact, the police officer said to delete any footage with police in it, as Zhent had done a sweep around of the entire street with his video camera that included us as well as the police. When questioned, the police officer said something about footage of police in uniform will jeopardise those individuals if they later want to go undercover, as it can be used to find out that they&#8217;re police. He stated that any footage taken of police is illegal.&#8221;</p>
<p>Comment of Zhent photographer in question:<br />
&#8220;I was approached and asked to delete footage from my video camera after doing some generic shots of anon and the the org, which the police happened to be standing in front of, it was not actually about the constable doing the move-along announcement.<br />
I was informed in so many words that it is illegal to film police officers, someone else will have to fill in the exact statement here.</p>
<p>I of course questioned this and was told, as RSG said, that footage of police officers could potentially jeopardize them if they went undercover. I don&#8217;t believe i was not quoted any exact law about this, and certainly none about required deletion of footage.</p>
<p>I sympathized with their statement but strongly objected to deleting the footage, knowing that I was well within my right to keep it and that being coerced to delete it would be unlawful and an abuse of photographers rights.<br />
However the officer in question firmly persisted, and I didn&#8217;t want to cause trouble (or get charged for some ridiculous offense), so I did delete the footage.</p>
<p>I am certainly not happy about all of this and I hope we can use this to bring an understanding to the police about the rights of photographers and the relevant police authority.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway, we didn&#8217;t end up moving on, but they did make us turn off the music, so we sung all our favourite tracks loudly to keep up the spirit.</p>
<p>We have video footage of the cops trying to move us along online here: <a href="http://vimeo.com/4232109" rel="nofollow">http://vimeo.com/4232109</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Workingindust</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-42955</link>
		<dc:creator>Workingindust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-42955</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m suprised FI#32 didn&#039;t use the &quot;I&#039;m normally an undercover cop and don&#039;t want my photo taken&quot; excuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m suprised FI#32 didn&#8217;t use the &#8220;I&#8217;m normally an undercover cop and don&#8217;t want my photo taken&#8221; excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inspector Gadget Opening german deutsch &#124; Electronics and Gadgets Review, Information, News and Sale</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-42871</link>
		<dc:creator>Inspector Gadget Opening german deutsch &#124; Electronics and Gadgets Review, Information, News and Sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 04:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-42871</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey SF Muni Fare Inspector #32, Photography is Not a Crime &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey SF Muni Fare Inspector #32, Photography is Not a Crime &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celine</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/05/hey-sf-muni-fare-inspector-32-photography-is-not-a-crime.html/comment-page-1#comment-42812</link>
		<dc:creator>Celine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=6243#comment-42812</guid>
		<description>Gary, I&#039;m curious -- why does he look like a former drug dealer or gang banger? Really, I want to know.

Thomas (and plug1), thanks for bringing this issue to light once again. Why are people so afraid of folks with cameras?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, I&#8217;m curious &#8212; why does he look like a former drug dealer or gang banger? Really, I want to know.</p>
<p>Thomas (and plug1), thanks for bringing this issue to light once again. Why are people so afraid of folks with cameras?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

