<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr User Asks Flickr to Check if Her Self Moderated Account is OK, Flickr Responds By Deleting the User&#8217;s Account Without Warning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.A.</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-293391</link>
		<dc:creator>C.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-293391</guid>
		<description>This is not uncommon at all, if my experience is any indicator. I accidentally forgot to properly moderate some adult photos on three separate occasions with three separate accounts. All 3 times I received a message politely stating that my account had been marked restricted and providing instructions on how to get it reviewed. ALL THREE TIMES, I followed the instructions, moderated the content, and requested a review. ALL THREE TIMES my accounts were then summarily deleted without warning. Only the first time did I receive a message explaining the deletion. The last 2 times I neither received warning nor explanation.

I tried searching Google today to see if others had experienced this, but so far, this is the closest match I&#039;ve found. Any advice would be appreciated. For now, I guess I will assume every time my account gets marked &quot;restricted&quot; that it is inevitable it will ultimately get deleted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not uncommon at all, if my experience is any indicator. I accidentally forgot to properly moderate some adult photos on three separate occasions with three separate accounts. All 3 times I received a message politely stating that my account had been marked restricted and providing instructions on how to get it reviewed. ALL THREE TIMES, I followed the instructions, moderated the content, and requested a review. ALL THREE TIMES my accounts were then summarily deleted without warning. Only the first time did I receive a message explaining the deletion. The last 2 times I neither received warning nor explanation.</p>
<p>I tried searching Google today to see if others had experienced this, but so far, this is the closest match I&#8217;ve found. Any advice would be appreciated. For now, I guess I will assume every time my account gets marked &#8220;restricted&#8221; that it is inevitable it will ultimately get deleted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dish Network</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-134166</link>
		<dc:creator>Dish Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-134166</guid>
		<description>Harsh and Draconian punishment for violating terms...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harsh and Draconian punishment for violating terms&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Lethal</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-98381</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Lethal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-98381</guid>
		<description>I just went thru similar - and I had NO adult content. Could it have been Jayne Mansfield&#039;s large breasts? Blaze Starr&#039;s bum? They sent me email after email stating their guidelines about &quot;fetish imagery&quot; and &quot;pubic hair&quot; and &quot;nudity,&quot; none of which I had (well, maybe Blaze&#039;s bum.) After going back and forth with the charming gentleman named Terrence, who not only flagged me as moderate (preventing me from posting to my favorite groups, &quot;Spelling Mistakes,&quot; &quot;Bad Signs,&quot; and of course, &quot;Vintage Big Hair,&quot;) I ended up deleting my account. I know I lost my money, but the year is nearly over and I couldn&#039;t deal with any more one sided arguments. What a waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just went thru similar &#8211; and I had NO adult content. Could it have been Jayne Mansfield&#8217;s large breasts? Blaze Starr&#8217;s bum? They sent me email after email stating their guidelines about &#8220;fetish imagery&#8221; and &#8220;pubic hair&#8221; and &#8220;nudity,&#8221; none of which I had (well, maybe Blaze&#8217;s bum.) After going back and forth with the charming gentleman named Terrence, who not only flagged me as moderate (preventing me from posting to my favorite groups, &#8220;Spelling Mistakes,&#8221; &#8220;Bad Signs,&#8221; and of course, &#8220;Vintage Big Hair,&#8221;) I ended up deleting my account. I know I lost my money, but the year is nearly over and I couldn&#8217;t deal with any more one sided arguments. What a waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unsure about renewing Flickr Pro membership - All Narfed Up</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-24551</link>
		<dc:creator>Unsure about renewing Flickr Pro membership - All Narfed Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-24551</guid>
		<description>[...] Flickr User Asks Flickr to Check if Her Self Moderated Account is OK, Flickr Responds By Deleting th... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flickr User Asks Flickr to Check if Her Self Moderated Account is OK, Flickr Responds By Deleting th&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: See Also&#8230; &#187; My Top Tech Trend: Social software deathwatch</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-24514</link>
		<dc:creator>See Also&#8230; &#187; My Top Tech Trend: Social software deathwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-24514</guid>
		<description>[...] of Ma.gnolia home page with apology and explanation.) Thomas Hawk has been blogging occasions (one, two) where Flickr permanently deleted users accounts with little notice or negotiation. (Please note [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Ma.gnolia home page with apology and explanation.) Thomas Hawk has been blogging occasions (one, two) where Flickr permanently deleted users accounts with little notice or negotiation. (Please note [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facing the global audience: Flickr and censorship &#171; Blogging Censorship</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-24501</link>
		<dc:creator>Facing the global audience: Flickr and censorship &#171; Blogging Censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-24501</guid>
		<description>[...] Hawk reported Monday on another case this week of a Flickr account being closed. She wasn&#8217;t sure if she was following the rules, so she contacted Flickr, who then closed her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hawk reported Monday on another case this week of a Flickr account being closed. She wasn&#8217;t sure if she was following the rules, so she contacted Flickr, who then closed her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lilburne</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-24438</link>
		<dc:creator>lilburne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-24438</guid>
		<description>You say &quot;there are currently 94 threads (most of them closed or locked by Flickr) in the Flickr help forum with the words “censorship” and “mistake” in them.&quot; interesting but what are we to make of Google&#039;s report that there are 14,700 websites with &quot;thomas hawk cunt&quot;?

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=thomas+hawk+cunt&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say &#8220;there are currently 94 threads (most of them closed or locked by Flickr) in the Flickr help forum with the words “censorship” and “mistake” in them.&#8221; interesting but what are we to make of Google&#8217;s report that there are 14,700 websites with &#8220;thomas hawk cunt&#8221;?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=thomas+hawk+cunt&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;aq=t&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=thomas+hawk+cunt&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;aq=t&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#038;client=firefox-a</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-24418</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-24418</guid>
		<description>Yes, flickr has the right to delete an account, but there appears to be too much of it going on for the wrong reasons or &quot;by mistake.&quot; 

If I&#039;m to believe what flickr says, when an account is deleted, it&#039;s gone... all data vanishes. This astounds me. The applications I work on as an application developer very rarely allow data to be permanently deleted. We flag it as deleted. It appears deleted to the users, but it&#039;s still recoverable if a mistake was made. It&#039;s a fairly common practice, and it floors me that flickr doesn&#039;t architect their systems this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, flickr has the right to delete an account, but there appears to be too much of it going on for the wrong reasons or &#8220;by mistake.&#8221; </p>
<p>If I&#8217;m to believe what flickr says, when an account is deleted, it&#8217;s gone&#8230; all data vanishes. This astounds me. The applications I work on as an application developer very rarely allow data to be permanently deleted. We flag it as deleted. It appears deleted to the users, but it&#8217;s still recoverable if a mistake was made. It&#8217;s a fairly common practice, and it floors me that flickr doesn&#8217;t architect their systems this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please_Delete_me</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-24405</link>
		<dc:creator>Please_Delete_me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-24405</guid>
		<description>What happened to the part where you say &quot;I am the CEO of Zooomr&quot;? Have to stopped disclosing this when bashing Flickr or are you no-longer the CEO of Zooomr?

Ironically it&#039;s also not possible to get an account deleted on Zooomr not matter how much you want it or ask, please when are you going to fix that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the part where you say &#8220;I am the CEO of Zooomr&#8221;? Have to stopped disclosing this when bashing Flickr or are you no-longer the CEO of Zooomr?</p>
<p>Ironically it&#8217;s also not possible to get an account deleted on Zooomr not matter how much you want it or ask, please when are you going to fix that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dd</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/02/flickr-user-asks-flickr-to-check-if-her-self-moderated-account-is-ok-flickr-responds-by-deleting-the-users-account-without-warning.html/comment-page-1#comment-24374</link>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomashawk.com/?p=5616#comment-24374</guid>
		<description>good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

