<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Initial Thoughts on the Canon 5D Mark II After 24 Hours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Storage</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>William Storage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been enjoying shooting with the 5D MkII quite a bit also. I&#039;ve seen some complaints about medium and high ISO noise for this camera, so tonight I walked out to the Bay Bridge and took some test shots. I can’t see how anyone who ever shot film or the last 10 years of digital wouldn’t be thrilled by the ISO 800-1600 performance of the Mk2. Identical shots at ISO 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 are here: http://www.bstorage.com/temp/5D/IsoTest/ . I think this is a decent test of image noise (dark fog) and the black-pixel issue (bright bridge lights). I’m now able to shoot with a long lens at small apertures in low light, getting sharp, no-flash shots of hummingbirds in flight (ISO 800-1600) – this is a first for me: http://www.bstorage.com/photo/us/ca/hummingbirds/ .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been enjoying shooting with the 5D MkII quite a bit also. I&#8217;ve seen some complaints about medium and high ISO noise for this camera, so tonight I walked out to the Bay Bridge and took some test shots. I can’t see how anyone who ever shot film or the last 10 years of digital wouldn’t be thrilled by the ISO 800-1600 performance of the Mk2. Identical shots at ISO 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 are here: <a href="http://www.bstorage.com/temp/5D/IsoTest/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bstorage.com/temp/5D/IsoTest/</a> . I think this is a decent test of image noise (dark fog) and the black-pixel issue (bright bridge lights). I’m now able to shoot with a long lens at small apertures in low light, getting sharp, no-flash shots of hummingbirds in flight (ISO 800-1600) – this is a first for me: <a href="http://www.bstorage.com/photo/us/ca/hummingbirds/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bstorage.com/photo/us/ca/hummingbirds/</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Siao</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Siao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Thomas,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The internal battery for the 5D is the CR2016.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Lithium-Coin-Battery-CR2016/dp/B0001MQUO2&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is an article that has a diagram of where the battery is located:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.12.31/canon-err99</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas,</p>
<p>The internal battery for the 5D is the CR2016.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Lithium-Coin-Battery-CR2016/dp/B0001MQUO2" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Sony-Lithium-Coin-Battery-CR2016/dp/B0001MQUO2</a></p>
<p>Here is an article that has a diagram of where the battery is located:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.12.31/canon-err99" rel="nofollow">http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2008.12.31/canon-err99</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I recently upgraded from a 300D (the original Digital Rebel) to the 5D MkII. What an upgrade it&#039;s been! I&#039;ve been very happy with it over the last month or so since getting it, and have really enjoyed the learning curve involved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ll second your observation about taking fewer shots, it&#039;s surprising how fast the card fills up if you&#039;re shooting RAW. The increased storage space on my hard disks was definitely a consideration before I upgraded, but I ended up deciding that something is always limiting, and in this case I didn&#039;t want it to be the camera.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Downloading RAW files is actually much faster than what I&#039;m used to with the old camera, something I attribute to the faster CF card and faster data transfer from the camera. On my 2.5 GHz Core Duo MacBook Pro, Lightroom is a bit slower generating previews of the RAW files, and exporting to JPEGs, but editing the photos seems to be about as fast as with the 300D files.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m looking forward to your further impressions on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently upgraded from a 300D (the original Digital Rebel) to the 5D MkII. What an upgrade it&#8217;s been! I&#8217;ve been very happy with it over the last month or so since getting it, and have really enjoyed the learning curve involved.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll second your observation about taking fewer shots, it&#8217;s surprising how fast the card fills up if you&#8217;re shooting RAW. The increased storage space on my hard disks was definitely a consideration before I upgraded, but I ended up deciding that something is always limiting, and in this case I didn&#8217;t want it to be the camera.</p>
<p>Downloading RAW files is actually much faster than what I&#8217;m used to with the old camera, something I attribute to the faster CF card and faster data transfer from the camera. On my 2.5 GHz Core Duo MacBook Pro, Lightroom is a bit slower generating previews of the RAW files, and exporting to JPEGs, but editing the photos seems to be about as fast as with the 300D files.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to your further impressions on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aviva5271</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>aviva5271</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Thomas - long time fan, first time commenter: I went from a 1D MIII to the 5D MII (had the original 5D before the 1D) and am noticing that I&#039;m pressing the delete button instead of play a lot - but that&#039;s because it&#039;s in the same place as the play button on the 1D! Thankfully it asks if you&#039;re sure before you go deleting stuff, so that&#039;s nice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m so happy with the images from my 5D MII - and agree with your other assessments as well....but yeah, they are BIG. I&#039;m getting a PowerMac in &#039;09 (upgrading from my maxed-out iMac).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas &#8211; long time fan, first time commenter: I went from a 1D MIII to the 5D MII (had the original 5D before the 1D) and am noticing that I&#8217;m pressing the delete button instead of play a lot &#8211; but that&#8217;s because it&#8217;s in the same place as the play button on the 1D! Thankfully it asks if you&#8217;re sure before you go deleting stuff, so that&#8217;s nice.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so happy with the images from my 5D MII &#8211; and agree with your other assessments as well&#8230;.but yeah, they are BIG. I&#8217;m getting a PowerMac in &#8217;09 (upgrading from my maxed-out iMac).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Campbell</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you finally got your mk II. I have been really enjoying mine, but I&#039;m coming from a 40d.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One thing you may notice is that it&#039;s very easy to over sharpen 5d Mark II RAWs. I use both Lightroom 2 and DPP and you have to be extra careful in Lightroom. In DPP the sharpness setting &#039;1&#039; is usually enough, I use 2 for softer photos, but beyond that things get nasty.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, Lightroom 2 runs fine on my first gen Macbook with Mark II RAWs but it takes about 10 seconds per file to convert to JPG. I doubt you will have any issues with performance on your Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you finally got your mk II. I have been really enjoying mine, but I&#8217;m coming from a 40d.</p>
<p>One thing you may notice is that it&#8217;s very easy to over sharpen 5d Mark II RAWs. I use both Lightroom 2 and DPP and you have to be extra careful in Lightroom. In DPP the sharpness setting &#8217;1&#8242; is usually enough, I use 2 for softer photos, but beyond that things get nasty.</p>
<p>Also, Lightroom 2 runs fine on my first gen Macbook with Mark II RAWs but it takes about 10 seconds per file to convert to JPG. I doubt you will have any issues with performance on your Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffH</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-69</guid>
		<description>@Justin,  I&#039;m up for a meet up if someone wants to arrange one in the South SF Bay Area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Justin,  I&#8217;m up for a meet up if someone wants to arrange one in the South SF Bay Area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Harris</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting some info about this and your thoughts. I just go the new 50D and am excited to eventually master it and move up to a full frame camera.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Peace,&lt;br /&gt;Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting some info about this and your thoughts. I just go the new 50D and am excited to eventually master it and move up to a full frame camera.</p>
<p>Peace,<br />Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Korn</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Korn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-71</guid>
		<description>SOOO jealous!  We have to meet up sometime soon so I can at least watch you play with it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOOO jealous!  We have to meet up sometime soon so I can at least watch you play with it <img src='http://thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Beem</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>William Beem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I think taking fewer shots is a good thing.  I&#039;ve noticed the same feeling since getting my Nikon D700, though I&#039;m not experiencing a major change in file size from my D200, as you are.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Still, something about switching bodies made me realize that I want to think more about my compositions, spend more time planning than reacting, and that leads to fewer (and I hope better) shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think taking fewer shots is a good thing.  I&#8217;ve noticed the same feeling since getting my Nikon D700, though I&#8217;m not experiencing a major change in file size from my D200, as you are.</p>
<p>Still, something about switching bodies made me realize that I want to think more about my compositions, spend more time planning than reacting, and that leads to fewer (and I hope better) shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffH</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2009/01/my-initial-thoughts-on-canon-5d-mark-ii.html/comment-page-1#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=19#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your quick review!  Looking forward to hearing what you think about the images once you process some of them.  My shooting experience has been very similar to yours.  I noticed that the AF seems a little quicker and possibly more accurate when using the center focus point, which I do most of the time.  I also noticed when using live view a lot or shooting video that the battery drains a lot quicker than the old 5D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your quick review!  Looking forward to hearing what you think about the images once you process some of them.  My shooting experience has been very similar to yours.  I noticed that the AF seems a little quicker and possibly more accurate when using the center focus point, which I do most of the time.  I also noticed when using live view a lot or shooting video that the battery drains a lot quicker than the old 5D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

