<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Launches New &#8220;Windows Live&#8221; Social Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2008/12/microsoft-launches-new-windows-live-social-network.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/12/microsoft-launches-new-windows-live-social-network.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quikboy</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/12/microsoft-launches-new-windows-live-social-network.html/comment-page-1#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Quikboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=51#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Great write up Thomas Hawk. Interesting how you perceive the new Windows Live. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Will there be any hopes of having Zooomr integration with Windows Live anytime soon?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. So in your world, would static graphical ads, with no animation be fine? Or is anything graphical bad? It used to be much worse with the ugly banners at the top of the page.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. You can upload bulk amounts of photos through Windows Live Photo Gallery, if you like using WLPG. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. Interesting about the nudity aspect. I think they&#039;ll only come in if someone reports it. However, I hope Microsoft is more lax, compared to Flickr. Nudity and fine arts can go together well. Also, porn pictures on a safe site like Windows Live, will offer users more security than going to those nasty porn sites where users can be exposed to malware, which would hurt the Windows experience. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;5. I agree, the licensing does need to be fixed. Maybe you and others can send some e-mails over to Redmond, or have a little discussion if you go to the next Pro Photo Summit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Windows Live Photos is no Flickr btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write up Thomas Hawk. Interesting how you perceive the new Windows Live. </p>
<p>1. Will there be any hopes of having Zooomr integration with Windows Live anytime soon?</p>
<p>2. So in your world, would static graphical ads, with no animation be fine? Or is anything graphical bad? It used to be much worse with the ugly banners at the top of the page.</p>
<p>3. You can upload bulk amounts of photos through Windows Live Photo Gallery, if you like using WLPG. </p>
<p>4. Interesting about the nudity aspect. I think they&#8217;ll only come in if someone reports it. However, I hope Microsoft is more lax, compared to Flickr. Nudity and fine arts can go together well. Also, porn pictures on a safe site like Windows Live, will offer users more security than going to those nasty porn sites where users can be exposed to malware, which would hurt the Windows experience. </p>
<p>5. I agree, the licensing does need to be fixed. Maybe you and others can send some e-mails over to Redmond, or have a little discussion if you go to the next Pro Photo Summit.</p>
<p>Windows Live Photos is no Flickr btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

