<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr Getty Licensing Deal, Code Named &#8220;Project Populace&#8221; UPDATED, to Launch With Tens of Thousands of Images in the Coming Months</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/flickr-getty-licensing-deal-code-named-project-populace-updated-to-launch-with-tens-of-thousands-of-images-in-the-coming-months.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/flickr-getty-licensing-deal-code-named-project-populace-updated-to-launch-with-tens-of-thousands-of-images-in-the-coming-months.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Search Engine Marketing Agency News &#124; webmara.com</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/flickr-getty-licensing-deal-code-named-project-populace-updated-to-launch-with-tens-of-thousands-of-images-in-the-coming-months.html/comment-page-1#comment-318620</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Search Engine Marketing Agency News &#124; webmara.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 07:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=232#comment-318620</guid>
		<description>[...] morning&#8217;s launch it would appear that Getty is only offering 4,284 flickr images for sale. Back in July of last year I reported on the collection based on comments made at the Microsoft Pro P... iStockphoto is 100% owned by Getty Images. Dube told us at that time that the collection would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] morning&#8217;s launch it would appear that Getty is only offering 4,284 flickr images for sale. Back in July of last year I reported on the collection based on comments made at the Microsoft Pro P&#8230; iStockphoto is 100% owned by Getty Images. Dube told us at that time that the collection would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getty images representative philippines</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/flickr-getty-licensing-deal-code-named-project-populace-updated-to-launch-with-tens-of-thousands-of-images-in-the-coming-months.html/comment-page-1#comment-285651</link>
		<dc:creator>getty images representative philippines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 05:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=232#comment-285651</guid>
		<description>Project Populace is not a good project name, it should be Project Money. lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Project Populace is not a good project name, it should be Project Money. lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/flickr-getty-licensing-deal-code-named-project-populace-updated-to-launch-with-tens-of-thousands-of-images-in-the-coming-months.html/comment-page-1#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=232#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>On a separate, much lighter note, Dude&#039;s hair is CRAZY.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- fireinthesky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a separate, much lighter note, Dude&#8217;s hair is CRAZY.</p>
<p>- fireinthesky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/flickr-getty-licensing-deal-code-named-project-populace-updated-to-launch-with-tens-of-thousands-of-images-in-the-coming-months.html/comment-page-1#comment-1348</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=232#comment-1348</guid>
		<description>&#039;...We intend to launch our Flickr collection in the coming months with tens of thousands of images, with thousands more added to the collection each month...&#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The comment from Ms. Russell is quite interesting. Gettys editors are barely able to edit &#039;ten of thousands&#039; of additional images. So who is going to do this job? Maybe the &#039;inspectors&#039; at iStock? This smells like a Microstock project with an agenda not yet disclosed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;&#8230;We intend to launch our Flickr collection in the coming months with tens of thousands of images, with thousands more added to the collection each month&#8230;&#8217;</p>
<p>The comment from Ms. Russell is quite interesting. Gettys editors are barely able to edit &#8216;ten of thousands&#8217; of additional images. So who is going to do this job? Maybe the &#8216;inspectors&#8217; at iStock? This smells like a Microstock project with an agenda not yet disclosed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Paul Ohmer</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/flickr-getty-licensing-deal-code-named-project-populace-updated-to-launch-with-tens-of-thousands-of-images-in-the-coming-months.html/comment-page-1#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>David Paul Ohmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=232#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>&quot;The goal from Getty images perspective is to come up with a singularly different collection that is fresh, completely different, handpicked from the corpus of Flickr,&quot; said Dube. &quot;These images will have nothing to do with traditional stock photography or microstock.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The above statement to me sounds like Getty is trying to find the new artistic, photographic style that the world is waiting for. I think Getty is betting that no one person will do this, but a collection of photographs from Flickr will. With some slick marketing they might pull it off.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; On the other hand the millions of great photos by Flickr photographers won&#039;t make it because Getty would consider them too &quot;stock&quot;. Some photos like a picture of a smiling baby never grow old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The goal from Getty images perspective is to come up with a singularly different collection that is fresh, completely different, handpicked from the corpus of Flickr,&#8221; said Dube. &#8220;These images will have nothing to do with traditional stock photography or microstock.&#8221;</p>
<p> The above statement to me sounds like Getty is trying to find the new artistic, photographic style that the world is waiting for. I think Getty is betting that no one person will do this, but a collection of photographs from Flickr will. With some slick marketing they might pull it off.</p>
<p> On the other hand the millions of great photos by Flickr photographers won&#8217;t make it because Getty would consider them too &#8220;stock&#8221;. Some photos like a picture of a smiling baby never grow old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXLated</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/flickr-getty-licensing-deal-code-named-project-populace-updated-to-launch-with-tens-of-thousands-of-images-in-the-coming-months.html/comment-page-1#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>PXLated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=232#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>My impression - I&#039;ve been on Fortune 500 projects where we&#039;ve looked at 10,000 images for one project with a full-time librarian just to log/sort and keep track of them all - bought 500 - is they will be very discerning. They will look for &quot;photographs&quot; that they feel buyers with budget will be interested in. They will probably not be interested in &quot;pictures&quot;. Unlike most web businesses, they have a long established business model (profitable). They sell quality, not quantity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My impression &#8211; I&#8217;ve been on Fortune 500 projects where we&#8217;ve looked at 10,000 images for one project with a full-time librarian just to log/sort and keep track of them all &#8211; bought 500 &#8211; is they will be very discerning. They will look for &#8220;photographs&#8221; that they feel buyers with budget will be interested in. They will probably not be interested in &#8220;pictures&#8221;. Unlike most web businesses, they have a long established business model (profitable). They sell quality, not quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

