<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boycott Hyatt Hotels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frances Eder</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-608717</link>
		<dc:creator>Frances Eder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-608717</guid>
		<description>A few things i have constantly told folks is that while searching for a good online electronics shop, there are a few elements that you have to think about. First and foremost, you need to make sure to find a reputable along with reliable store that has enjoyed great testimonials and classification from other individuals and business world analysts. This will make sure that you are dealing with a well-known store that gives good assistance and aid to its patrons. Many thanks for sharing your thinking on this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few things i have constantly told folks is that while searching for a good online electronics shop, there are a few elements that you have to think about. First and foremost, you need to make sure to find a reputable along with reliable store that has enjoyed great testimonials and classification from other individuals and business world analysts. This will make sure that you are dealing with a well-known store that gives good assistance and aid to its patrons. Many thanks for sharing your thinking on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyatt Boycott</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-98912</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyatt Boycott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-98912</guid>
		<description>Another reason to boycott Hyatt -- three of their Boston hotels just fired all of their long-time housekeepers. Managers had been lying to the housekeepers and telling the employees that they were training staff who would fill in on vacation. Once the replacements were trained, the longtime employees were fired without notice, and replaced by an outsourced group of minimum wage workers who receive no benefits. The original employees weren&#039;t making all that much, weren&#039;t union, but did receive benefits and many had worked there for years -- some for over 20 years. 

Do you want to stay at a Hyatt if that&#039;s the value they place on their room cleaning services? The bare minimum spent and not a cent more? Please take a second and got to hyattboycott.com and sign the petition to have these workers reinstated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason to boycott Hyatt &#8212; three of their Boston hotels just fired all of their long-time housekeepers. Managers had been lying to the housekeepers and telling the employees that they were training staff who would fill in on vacation. Once the replacements were trained, the longtime employees were fired without notice, and replaced by an outsourced group of minimum wage workers who receive no benefits. The original employees weren&#8217;t making all that much, weren&#8217;t union, but did receive benefits and many had worked there for years &#8212; some for over 20 years. </p>
<p>Do you want to stay at a Hyatt if that&#8217;s the value they place on their room cleaning services? The bare minimum spent and not a cent more? Please take a second and got to hyattboycott.com and sign the petition to have these workers reinstated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>I was just a bit confused on what does Boycott Hyatt Hotels have that make it have an edge over the other hotels. Can you send me more information about this hotel at my email address? thanks!!!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jim&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- - - - - - -&lt;br /&gt;http://www.1explore.com&lt;br /&gt;Your life deserves a place like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just a bit confused on what does Boycott Hyatt Hotels have that make it have an edge over the other hotels. Can you send me more information about this hotel at my email address? thanks!!!</p>
<p>Jim</p>
<p>- &#8211; - &#8211; - &#8211; -<br /><a href="http://www.1explore.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.1explore.com</a><br />Your life deserves a place like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crenelle</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>crenelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>If owners of property that is frequented by the public want a no photography policy, they should be required to post clearly visible signage that says so. In all commonly applicable languages. It should be a federal law, so that people know to look for the signs somewhere and know where they stand. This also lets concerned citizens rat out people using their cameras in the lobby. So when Fox News wants to tape an interview in the lobby, the public can put a quick end to that illegal activity. Eventually, I hope, that sign will be taken down, for obvious reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If owners of property that is frequented by the public want a no photography policy, they should be required to post clearly visible signage that says so. In all commonly applicable languages. It should be a federal law, so that people know to look for the signs somewhere and know where they stand. This also lets concerned citizens rat out people using their cameras in the lobby. So when Fox News wants to tape an interview in the lobby, the public can put a quick end to that illegal activity. Eventually, I hope, that sign will be taken down, for obvious reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>@All,  They are NOT able to ban photography (http://www.kantor.com/useful/Legal-Rights-of-Photographers.pdf) but they can ask you to leave.  The lobby of the hotel is a semi-public place on private property.  Until they ask you to leave, you may remain.  Once they ask you to leave, you can even take photos on your way out.  Photography is NOT a crime!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;@Anonymous (with the wonderful stories of people dying on NYC subways)  there is NOT a person dying every day on the NYC subways.  These events do occur several times a year, but they hit the papers.  If it were one death every day, I suspect your subway driving &quot;friend&quot; would have hit more than just one person in their career.  Please do not make up facts just to support your argument.  It makes me think your argument is entirely without merit.  For actual death statistics, see e.g. http://www.nysubway.com/safety/subwaysafety.html which states there were only 23 deaths in 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@All,  They are NOT able to ban photography (<a href="http://www.kantor.com/useful/Legal-Rights-of-Photographers.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.kantor.com/useful/Legal-Rights-of-Photographers.pdf</a>) but they can ask you to leave.  The lobby of the hotel is a semi-public place on private property.  Until they ask you to leave, you may remain.  Once they ask you to leave, you can even take photos on your way out.  Photography is NOT a crime!</p>
<p>@Anonymous (with the wonderful stories of people dying on NYC subways)  there is NOT a person dying every day on the NYC subways.  These events do occur several times a year, but they hit the papers.  If it were one death every day, I suspect your subway driving &#8220;friend&#8221; would have hit more than just one person in their career.  Please do not make up facts just to support your argument.  It makes me think your argument is entirely without merit.  For actual death statistics, see e.g. <a href="http://www.nysubway.com/safety/subwaysafety.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nysubway.com/safety/subwaysafety.html</a> which states there were only 23 deaths in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph N. Hall</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph N. Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Regarding the comment about the temporary prohibition on photography in the NYC subway - that was abolished quite some time ago. The same goes for the strict permitting policies for photography in public places. That&#039;s gone now too. It wasn&#039;t really supportable in court, and it was extraordinarily unpopular with a large, vocal crowd of photographers and other residents.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, if you are creating concern or a distraction with your photography, you may be stopped and questioned, in which case if it&#039;s someone official, you should definitely be chill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;Just something to consider about taking photographs of trains/subway: while its prohibited in the NYC subway system (and iirc you can even be arrested if caught, you&#039;ll definitely be detained, searched, questioned, and all your details will be placed into a NYC police database), it still happens.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the comment about the temporary prohibition on photography in the NYC subway &#8211; that was abolished quite some time ago. The same goes for the strict permitting policies for photography in public places. That&#8217;s gone now too. It wasn&#8217;t really supportable in court, and it was extraordinarily unpopular with a large, vocal crowd of photographers and other residents.</p>
<p>Of course, if you are creating concern or a distraction with your photography, you may be stopped and questioned, in which case if it&#8217;s someone official, you should definitely be chill.</p>
<p><i>Just something to consider about taking photographs of trains/subway: while its prohibited in the NYC subway system (and iirc you can even be arrested if caught, you&#8217;ll definitely be detained, searched, questioned, and all your details will be placed into a NYC police database), it still happens.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>Like others have said, of course it&#039;s their right to ban whatever they want. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the same as wanting a vegan burger in McDonald&#039;s like someone said though. It seems more like McDonald&#039;s  saying no one under 18 is allowed. Why? who goes to McDonald&#039;s? A lot of young people. Who stays at hotels? Many people on vacation taking, you guessed it, photos. There are plenty of hotels around so I and the 5 people I just mentioned this to will probably steer clear of Hyatt just for being annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like others have said, of course it&#8217;s their right to ban whatever they want. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the same as wanting a vegan burger in McDonald&#8217;s like someone said though. It seems more like McDonald&#8217;s  saying no one under 18 is allowed. Why? who goes to McDonald&#8217;s? A lot of young people. Who stays at hotels? Many people on vacation taking, you guessed it, photos. There are plenty of hotels around so I and the 5 people I just mentioned this to will probably steer clear of Hyatt just for being annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-1329</guid>
		<description>I work as a manager for a Hyatt hotel.  Please keep in mind that when the security guard said it was &quot;hotel policy&quot;, he is speaking of that particular hotel, as most Hyatts have different owners and therefore different policies.  That said, the main concern for banning photography in the public areas of the hotel (other than the typical photo of friends) is to ensure privacy of the guests.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are other instances which may - at times - be of concern.  We may have celebrities staying with us during which time we are particularly sensitive to photography.  We also have prominent policians who stay with us, in which case government authorities have already inspected the property for security and then instruct us on further measures.  And finally, sometimes it is simply a case of designers photographing our interior designs to copy - which is why photography is also prohibited in the decorated (furniture) sections of many department stores.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I hope you will take it easy on us and perhaps understand where we&#039;re coming from.  I apologize for any inconvenience this has caused you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work as a manager for a Hyatt hotel.  Please keep in mind that when the security guard said it was &#8220;hotel policy&#8221;, he is speaking of that particular hotel, as most Hyatts have different owners and therefore different policies.  That said, the main concern for banning photography in the public areas of the hotel (other than the typical photo of friends) is to ensure privacy of the guests.</p>
<p>There are other instances which may &#8211; at times &#8211; be of concern.  We may have celebrities staying with us during which time we are particularly sensitive to photography.  We also have prominent policians who stay with us, in which case government authorities have already inspected the property for security and then instruct us on further measures.  And finally, sometimes it is simply a case of designers photographing our interior designs to copy &#8211; which is why photography is also prohibited in the decorated (furniture) sections of many department stores.</p>
<p>I hope you will take it easy on us and perhaps understand where we&#8217;re coming from.  I apologize for any inconvenience this has caused you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>So, what would happen if you replied &quot;I&#039;m not going to stop taking pictures, but feel free to call the police.&quot; You are a paying patron of the hotel. I would think they would have to give your money back, and ask you to leave, before the police could really do anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what would happen if you replied &#8220;I&#8217;m not going to stop taking pictures, but feel free to call the police.&#8221; You are a paying patron of the hotel. I would think they would have to give your money back, and ask you to leave, before the police could really do anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/07/boycott-hyatt-hotels.html/comment-page-1#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=231#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>Just something to consider about taking photographs of trains/subway: while its prohibited in the NYC subway system (and iirc you can even be arrested if caught, you&#039;ll definitely be detained, searched, questioned, and all your details will be placed into a NYC police database), it still happens.  A train operator I know says he sees tourists taking photos of the trains and stations all the time.  For him, that&#039;s not the issue.  The big issue is safety.  Before a train enters an underground station it&#039;s normally in a dark tunnel.  While approaching the station the light from the station lights up the end of the tunnel and gives the operator a chance for his pupils to adjust to the brightness.  But yahoos with their disposacams sometimes take pictures of the train entering the station. Those disposacams have flashes...and most cameras, even digital ones will usually need to use a flash in the poor light of some subway stations. The flash causes a very short but significant blindness until the operator&#039;s pupils have a chance to adjust from the darkness to the flash to the light in the station.  Even though the blindness may be momentary and partial or sometimes fully blinding, it happens at the crucial time when the operator is first seeing the station and judging when to let off on power and when and how hard to apply the brake so that the train fully enters the station and also doesn&#039;t overshoot.  If a train doesn&#039;t fully enter a station or does overshoot, then a time consuming procedure of preventing the doors of the last car or two stuck in the tunnel at either end from opening, then the conductor or operator having to leave the booth and move the passengers from the overshot/undershot car to another car so they could disembark...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An even more serious issue is if someone is on the tracks or someone falls onto the tracks when the train is entering the station and someone blinds the operator with a flash...that person doesn&#039;t have a chance.  The operator I know has had his share of individuals who&#039;ve jumped from the platform onto the tracks to retrieve something they&#039;ve dropped (a camera, for one, a watch, an earing, camera bags, computer bags, briefcases, a sandwich, yes a sandwich - still wrapped) and depending on where (beginning, middle, end) they&#039;ve jumped, makes the difference on whether they get hit (die) or not.  It&#039;s a split second reaction of the operator seeing the person on the tracks immediately upon entering the station and putting the train into emergency stop to save that person&#039;s life. In NYC subway system, there is on average at least one person killed EVERY DAY by being struck by a train while standing on the tracks due to retrieving something, falling, being pushed, or intentionally jumping (a lot of jumpers, especially around the holidays).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And for those that are run over by a train...it&#039;s not pretty.  They don&#039;t all die right away.  Those that are run over by the wheels over the middle of their body, sometimes they are conscious and live long enough for their family members to be picked up at home and brought to the station by the police for them to say good bye to their relatives because as soon as the train is lifted off of them rolled off, they die.  This includes the individuals whose lower bodies are sandwiched between the train car the the platform.  Their lower body is reduced to a few inches deep, yet some still are conscious until the train is moved to release them and then they instantly die.  The operator I know successfully reacted fast enough to save the lives of many jumpers and individuals on the tracks where they shouldn&#039;t be.  But he&#039;s also had a jumper end up under his train and those are tougher to prevent because they jump suddenly without indicating, wait until the train is very close and position themselves closer to where the train is entering the station so the train is traveling faster.  And he&#039;s also had many tourists snap pictures of his train entering the stations, with their flashes firing, blinding him. As for other security concerns, he doesn&#039;t care.  The tourists and photographers can deal with NYC transit police.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just something to consider about taking photographs of trains/subway: while its prohibited in the NYC subway system (and iirc you can even be arrested if caught, you&#8217;ll definitely be detained, searched, questioned, and all your details will be placed into a NYC police database), it still happens.  A train operator I know says he sees tourists taking photos of the trains and stations all the time.  For him, that&#8217;s not the issue.  The big issue is safety.  Before a train enters an underground station it&#8217;s normally in a dark tunnel.  While approaching the station the light from the station lights up the end of the tunnel and gives the operator a chance for his pupils to adjust to the brightness.  But yahoos with their disposacams sometimes take pictures of the train entering the station. Those disposacams have flashes&#8230;and most cameras, even digital ones will usually need to use a flash in the poor light of some subway stations. The flash causes a very short but significant blindness until the operator&#8217;s pupils have a chance to adjust from the darkness to the flash to the light in the station.  Even though the blindness may be momentary and partial or sometimes fully blinding, it happens at the crucial time when the operator is first seeing the station and judging when to let off on power and when and how hard to apply the brake so that the train fully enters the station and also doesn&#8217;t overshoot.  If a train doesn&#8217;t fully enter a station or does overshoot, then a time consuming procedure of preventing the doors of the last car or two stuck in the tunnel at either end from opening, then the conductor or operator having to leave the booth and move the passengers from the overshot/undershot car to another car so they could disembark&#8230;</p>
<p>An even more serious issue is if someone is on the tracks or someone falls onto the tracks when the train is entering the station and someone blinds the operator with a flash&#8230;that person doesn&#8217;t have a chance.  The operator I know has had his share of individuals who&#8217;ve jumped from the platform onto the tracks to retrieve something they&#8217;ve dropped (a camera, for one, a watch, an earing, camera bags, computer bags, briefcases, a sandwich, yes a sandwich &#8211; still wrapped) and depending on where (beginning, middle, end) they&#8217;ve jumped, makes the difference on whether they get hit (die) or not.  It&#8217;s a split second reaction of the operator seeing the person on the tracks immediately upon entering the station and putting the train into emergency stop to save that person&#8217;s life. In NYC subway system, there is on average at least one person killed EVERY DAY by being struck by a train while standing on the tracks due to retrieving something, falling, being pushed, or intentionally jumping (a lot of jumpers, especially around the holidays).</p>
<p>And for those that are run over by a train&#8230;it&#8217;s not pretty.  They don&#8217;t all die right away.  Those that are run over by the wheels over the middle of their body, sometimes they are conscious and live long enough for their family members to be picked up at home and brought to the station by the police for them to say good bye to their relatives because as soon as the train is lifted off of them rolled off, they die.  This includes the individuals whose lower bodies are sandwiched between the train car the the platform.  Their lower body is reduced to a few inches deep, yet some still are conscious until the train is moved to release them and then they instantly die.  The operator I know successfully reacted fast enough to save the lives of many jumpers and individuals on the tracks where they shouldn&#8217;t be.  But he&#8217;s also had a jumper end up under his train and those are tougher to prevent because they jump suddenly without indicating, wait until the train is very close and position themselves closer to where the train is entering the station so the train is traveling faster.  And he&#8217;s also had many tourists snap pictures of his train entering the stations, with their flashes firing, blinding him. As for other security concerns, he doesn&#8217;t care.  The tourists and photographers can deal with NYC transit police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

