Comments on: 67% of Flickr Users Have Zero Photos? http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:35:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Yuvi http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html/comment-page-1#comment-2559 Yuvi Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:50:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=467#comment-2559 bad sample size. Gave a good idea to me though, I'll grab a larger sample size and run a more thorough analysis soon. bad sample size. Gave a good idea to me though, I’ll grab a larger sample size and run a more thorough analysis soon.

]]> By: Jon http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html/comment-page-1#comment-2560 Jon Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:34:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=467#comment-2560 Also don't forget about being able to favorite photos. That in itself is a great reason for me to sign up and I'm sure it was for others. Also don’t forget about being able to favorite photos. That in itself is a great reason for me to sign up and I’m sure it was for others.

]]> By: Anonymous http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html/comment-page-1#comment-2561 Anonymous Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:06:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=467#comment-2561 324 doesn't sound that small. If the sample were scientifically created, wouldn't that give a 10% margin of error or so?<br /><br />And for the record, I'm one of the 67% of users without any photos posted. I only have an account to view other people's private photos. 324 doesn’t sound that small. If the sample were scientifically created, wouldn’t that give a 10% margin of error or so?

And for the record, I’m one of the 67% of users without any photos posted. I only have an account to view other people’s private photos.

]]> By: jimporett http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html/comment-page-1#comment-2562 jimporett Sun, 06 Apr 2008 18:44:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=467#comment-2562 Yeah that whole study is bogus it seems to me. Though flickr has seemed to be less fun for me now that it has become so big. With Yahoo on the ropes I don't want to rely on it long term to house my photos.<br /><br />While I will continue to use flickr, mainly for the community there, I have decided that Smug Mug will be my main photo site. I will cross post photos to flickr I want my friends in the community there to see, but not majority of my images. Yeah that whole study is bogus it seems to me. Though flickr has seemed to be less fun for me now that it has become so big. With Yahoo on the ropes I don’t want to rely on it long term to house my photos.

While I will continue to use flickr, mainly for the community there, I have decided that Smug Mug will be my main photo site. I will cross post photos to flickr I want my friends in the community there to see, but not majority of my images.

]]> By: tomh http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html/comment-page-1#comment-2563 tomh Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:51:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=467#comment-2563 For a site that has millions of members, 324 is a pretty small sample size. For a site that has millions of members, 324 is a pretty small sample size.

]]> By: Digitale foto's http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html/comment-page-1#comment-2564 Digitale foto's Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:50:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=467#comment-2564 A conclusion based on 324 flickr users is not exactly an amount to build conclusions on. A conclusion based on 324 flickr users is not exactly an amount to build conclusions on.

]]> By: Digitale foto's http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html/comment-page-1#comment-21691 Digitale foto's Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:50:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=467#comment-21691 A conclusion based on 324 flickr users is not exactly an amount to build conclusions on. A conclusion based on 324 flickr users is not exactly an amount to build conclusions on.

]]> By: Greg Furry http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html/comment-page-1#comment-2565 Greg Furry Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:44:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=467#comment-2565 I totally agree. I was going through my flickr contacts the other day and found lots of friends and family members that just signed up to see my photos. Or I signed them up and showed them how to upload photos and they never got around to it after I left. I also count myself as a person that is signed up for every cool sounding site on the net. 5% actually end up being useful. I totally agree. I was going through my flickr contacts the other day and found lots of friends and family members that just signed up to see my photos. Or I signed them up and showed them how to upload photos and they never got around to it after I left. I also count myself as a person that is signed up for every cool sounding site on the net. 5% actually end up being useful.

]]> By: Bryce http://thomashawk.com/2008/04/67-of-flickr-users-have-zero-photos.html/comment-page-1#comment-2566 Bryce Sun, 06 Apr 2008 11:42:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=467#comment-2566 And some people will join solely to access someone else's private photos. And some people will join solely to access someone else’s private photos.

]]>