<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Tagcow the Future of Photo Recognition and Tagging?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Torley</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2697</link>
		<dc:creator>Torley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2697</guid>
		<description>Followup: I ended up sending my whole Flickr stream of 10,000+ images through TagCow and it came out through the other end with what I&#039;d term &quot;pleasantly mixed results&quot;. In some cases, the results were excellent, in some, awful, and in most... they were &quot;OK. I blogged about it here:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;     » &lt;a href=&quot;http://torley.com/tagcows-free-flickr-auto-tagging-gets-pleasantly-mixed-results-with-second-life-pictures&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TagCow&#039;s free Flickr auto-tagging gets pleasantly mixed results with Second Life pictures&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;@z@andor: You may&#039;ve been tagging mine! And if so, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Followup: I ended up sending my whole Flickr stream of 10,000+ images through TagCow and it came out through the other end with what I&#8217;d term &#8220;pleasantly mixed results&#8221;. In some cases, the results were excellent, in some, awful, and in most&#8230; they were &#8220;OK. I blogged about it here:</p>
<p><b>     » <a href="http://torley.com/tagcows-free-flickr-auto-tagging-gets-pleasantly-mixed-results-with-second-life-pictures" rel="nofollow">TagCow&#8217;s free Flickr auto-tagging gets pleasantly mixed results with Second Life pictures</a></b></p>
<p>@z@andor: You may&#8217;ve been tagging mine! And if so, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TranceMist</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator>TranceMist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2698</guid>
		<description>I recently came across &lt;a href=&quot;http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/devoting-their-lives-to-google/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; by David Pogue, and in turn &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8246463980976635143&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this video&lt;/a&gt; on Human Computation that explains how Google gets people to tag millions of images for them, correctly and effectively, for free.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Incidentally, there&#039;s a hilarious scene in that video starting at time = 20:30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across <a href="http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/devoting-their-lives-to-google/" rel="nofollow">this article</a> by David Pogue, and in turn <a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8246463980976635143" rel="nofollow">this video</a> on Human Computation that explains how Google gets people to tag millions of images for them, correctly and effectively, for free.</p>
<p>Incidentally, there&#8217;s a hilarious scene in that video starting at time = 20:30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Franco</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2699</guid>
		<description>From the terms of service:&lt;br /&gt;&quot;by posting, uploading, providing or submitting any Submission you are granting TagCow permission to use your Submission in any manner, including, without limitation, the license rights to: copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform,reproduce, edit, translate and reformat your Submission; to publish your name in connection with your Submission; and the right to sublicense such rights to any third party.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is this a rights grab?  Without paying for the service how is this company supposed to make money, especially considering they have to pay people to tag the photos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the terms of service:<br />&#8220;by posting, uploading, providing or submitting any Submission you are granting TagCow permission to use your Submission in any manner, including, without limitation, the license rights to: copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform,reproduce, edit, translate and reformat your Submission; to publish your name in connection with your Submission; and the right to sublicense such rights to any third party.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this a rights grab?  Without paying for the service how is this company supposed to make money, especially considering they have to pay people to tag the photos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z@ndor</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2700</link>
		<dc:creator>Z@ndor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2700</guid>
		<description>I tagged a lot of pictures of ugly british people and second life screenshots for them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tagged a lot of pictures of ugly british people and second life screenshots for them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wizetux</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2701</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizetux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2701</guid>
		<description>In an article in the Seattle PI, they asked the founder, Michael Droz, how they were doing the photo tagging.  He states that they are using Amazon.com&#039;s Mechanical Turk system.  http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/357177_tagcow01.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an article in the Seattle PI, they asked the founder, Michael Droz, how they were doing the photo tagging.  He states that they are using Amazon.com&#8217;s Mechanical Turk system.  <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/357177_tagcow01.html" rel="nofollow">http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/357177_tagcow01.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monsieurgrand02</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2703</link>
		<dc:creator>monsieurgrand02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2703</guid>
		<description>Wow. Calling someone a punk while staying &quot;anonymous.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Classic.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And actually, it hasn&#039;t been made clear as to how the company conducts their business. We can only assume that it is done with &quot;cheap labor.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Calling someone a punk while staying &#8220;anonymous.&#8221;</p>
<p>Classic.</p>
<p>And actually, it hasn&#8217;t been made clear as to how the company conducts their business. We can only assume that it is done with &#8220;cheap labor.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Amazon Mechanical Turk, idiot. No image recognition software, no magic, just using cheap labor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That is what Thomas Hawk thinks is Genius !!! What a punk...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Amazon Mechanical Turk, idiot. No image recognition software, no magic, just using cheap labor.</p>
<p>That is what Thomas Hawk thinks is Genius !!! What a punk&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hawk</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Perchance, do you know what the &quot;Pole account for new images:&quot; means? I presume it may be a typo of &quot;Poll&quot;?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Torley, yes, this is my guess.  My guess is that the service routinely connects up to the Flickr API to check for new photos to tag for you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;Appears that tagcow essentially spams your flickr stream with ads in the descriptions, once they add the tags. Not cool.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cyberdex, I don&#039;t think this is the case.  I think the stream you are looking at is the CEO of the company&#039;s.  I&#039;m sure he tagged his photos with his company name to build awareness of his company.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I didn&#039;t find any spam or marketing being tagged to my imagery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Perchance, do you know what the &#8220;Pole account for new images:&#8221; means? I presume it may be a typo of &#8220;Poll&#8221;?</i></p>
<p>Torley, yes, this is my guess.  My guess is that the service routinely connects up to the Flickr API to check for new photos to tag for you.</p>
<p><i>Appears that tagcow essentially spams your flickr stream with ads in the descriptions, once they add the tags. Not cool.</i></p>
<p>Cyberdex, I don&#8217;t think this is the case.  I think the stream you are looking at is the CEO of the company&#8217;s.  I&#8217;m sure he tagged his photos with his company name to build awareness of his company.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t find any spam or marketing being tagged to my imagery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hawk</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The scariest part is their privacy policy which is indeed &quot;TBD&quot; per their site. Oh and the TBD &quot;legal stuff&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Aaron in my case I don&#039;t care much about their privacy policy.  All of the photos that I asked them to tag are public photos of mine on Flickr.  100% of my photos on Flickr are public.  To this end I&#039;ve already made the decision that these photos ought to be shared with the entire world and I wouldn&#039;t necessarily expect any privacy from Tagcow with regards to these photos.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I had private photos on the other hand I might not trust them to tagcow.  Then again, if I had private photos I certainly wouldn&#039;t be uploading them to Flickr as public photos either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The scariest part is their privacy policy which is indeed &#8220;TBD&#8221; per their site. Oh and the TBD &#8220;legal stuff&#8221;.</i></p>
<p>Aaron in my case I don&#8217;t care much about their privacy policy.  All of the photos that I asked them to tag are public photos of mine on Flickr.  100% of my photos on Flickr are public.  To this end I&#8217;ve already made the decision that these photos ought to be shared with the entire world and I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily expect any privacy from Tagcow with regards to these photos.</p>
<p>If I had private photos on the other hand I might not trust them to tagcow.  Then again, if I had private photos I certainly wouldn&#8217;t be uploading them to Flickr as public photos either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyson Williams</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/is-tagcow-future-of-photo-recognition.html/comment-page-1#comment-2707</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyson Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=494#comment-2707</guid>
		<description>I hate tagging photos but I do it... and if this service can do it for me, it would make my life a bit easier in a long run! I will give it a try, thanks for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate tagging photos but I do it&#8230; and if this service can do it for me, it would make my life a bit easier in a long run! I will give it a try, thanks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
