<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr Video to Premier Next Month?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/flickr-video-to-premier-next-month.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/flickr-video-to-premier-next-month.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:06:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TranceMist</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/flickr-video-to-premier-next-month.html/comment-page-1#comment-2835</link>
		<dc:creator>TranceMist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=526#comment-2835</guid>
		<description>April 1, maybe?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;YouTube&#039;s video quality is so poor, and it&#039;s resolution so limited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April 1, maybe?</p>
<p>YouTube&#8217;s video quality is so poor, and it&#8217;s resolution so limited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaMisfit</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/flickr-video-to-premier-next-month.html/comment-page-1#comment-2836</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaMisfit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=526#comment-2836</guid>
		<description>Content wise, it&#039;s the internet so your going to have to sift through crap no matter what.  As long as the search results work to some degree I&#039;m fine.  I rarely start at youtube.com anyways.  I usually go there through embedded videos on blogs.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Right now I feel that flickr has done a great job with the IA of the site by keeping things clean.  The only thing left I would really want is a blogging platform to integrate flickr photos more easily.  Like WordPress.  Until Yahoo bridges that gap I&#039;ll figure out how to do it on my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content wise, it&#8217;s the internet so your going to have to sift through crap no matter what.  As long as the search results work to some degree I&#8217;m fine.  I rarely start at youtube.com anyways.  I usually go there through embedded videos on blogs.  </p>
<p>Right now I feel that flickr has done a great job with the IA of the site by keeping things clean.  The only thing left I would really want is a blogging platform to integrate flickr photos more easily.  Like WordPress.  Until Yahoo bridges that gap I&#8217;ll figure out how to do it on my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/03/flickr-video-to-premier-next-month.html/comment-page-1#comment-2837</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=526#comment-2837</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in agreement with you that Vimeo is doing some good things in this space.  If Flickr can can delivery something like Vimeo (slick design, focus on original content, etc.) and apply the Interestingness algorithm to it so that people can easily find the good content, they might have some success with this.  It will go nowhere if they just try to create a YouTube clone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in agreement with you that Vimeo is doing some good things in this space.  If Flickr can can delivery something like Vimeo (slick design, focus on original content, etc.) and apply the Interestingness algorithm to it so that people can easily find the good content, they might have some success with this.  It will go nowhere if they just try to create a YouTube clone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
