<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Camera That Autofocuses Perfectly 100% of the Time May Be Just Around the Corner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2008/02/camera-that-autofocuses-perfectly-100.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/02/camera-that-autofocuses-perfectly-100.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jeffmilner.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Advanced Photography Research at Stanford</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/02/camera-that-autofocuses-perfectly-100.html/comment-page-1#comment-63816</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffmilner.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Advanced Photography Research at Stanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=613#comment-63816</guid>
		<description>[...] (via) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uniq-</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/02/camera-that-autofocuses-perfectly-100.html/comment-page-1#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>Uniq-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=613#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>I wonder if this wil really help, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I mean the lens motor has to move in or out to change focus. So the only solution is really a gigantic sensor and youve divided sections of it into seperate aperatures, thats gonna need to be like 3 or 4 aperatures at once to be useful, like bracketing for aperature. The shutter speed will have to remain consistent and the sensor needs to be like 140mm (size of a calculator)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The camera will be a LOT bigger then todays camera, weigh more, be noisier etc think of the shutter sound from a shutter that big and the mirror slap could break your hand.. lol &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...I can see this for studio applications though big time, but nobodys gonna carry something that large/expensive down the street.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When will they stop making advances that dumb down the camera and start making things that help the people that know what they are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if this wil really help, </p>
<p>I mean the lens motor has to move in or out to change focus. So the only solution is really a gigantic sensor and youve divided sections of it into seperate aperatures, thats gonna need to be like 3 or 4 aperatures at once to be useful, like bracketing for aperature. The shutter speed will have to remain consistent and the sensor needs to be like 140mm (size of a calculator)</p>
<p>The camera will be a LOT bigger then todays camera, weigh more, be noisier etc think of the shutter sound from a shutter that big and the mirror slap could break your hand.. lol </p>
<p>&#8230;I can see this for studio applications though big time, but nobodys gonna carry something that large/expensive down the street.</p>
<p>When will they stop making advances that dumb down the camera and start making things that help the people that know what they are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astaryth</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2008/02/camera-that-autofocuses-perfectly-100.html/comment-page-1#comment-3389</link>
		<dc:creator>Astaryth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=613#comment-3389</guid>
		<description>Now, there&#039;s a toy I would like to get my hands on! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, there&#8217;s a toy I would like to get my hands on! <img src='http://thomashawk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
