<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Technorati Looks Great</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/new-technorati-looks-great.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/new-technorati-looks-great.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/new-technorati-looks-great.html/comment-page-1#comment-7531</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1157#comment-7531</guid>
		<description>Of course, now it works. Someone must have just removed the &quot;beta&quot; tag a little too soon. Still don&#039;t get why they put more emphasis on videos &amp; photos, that just makes me want to visit Flickr or YouTube to do my searching.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They should concentrate on being the best blog search engine, and the other stuff should be nice sidelines. I think they have it backwards right now. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Who else has a good blog search?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, now it works. Someone must have just removed the &#8220;beta&#8221; tag a little too soon. Still don&#8217;t get why they put more emphasis on videos &#038; photos, that just makes me want to visit Flickr or YouTube to do my searching.</p>
<p>They should concentrate on being the best blog search engine, and the other stuff should be nice sidelines. I think they have it backwards right now. </p>
<p>Who else has a good blog search?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/new-technorati-looks-great.html/comment-page-1#comment-7532</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1157#comment-7532</guid>
		<description>It may look great. It may be faster. But it works like crap. I searched for Catalina Marathon, and instead of showing me the relevant posts-- which is, after all, why I go to Technorati-- it shows me links to YouTube &amp; Flickr. Which is fine &amp; all, but that&#039;s not why I&#039;m there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Worst, when I clicked on posts, it claimed there were no results for Catalina Marathon. Which is utterly bogus, since I visited at least a half dozen less than 2 months ago-- and that was only for this year&#039;s race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Maybe I&#039;m missing something, but right now it looks broken to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may look great. It may be faster. But it works like crap. I searched for Catalina Marathon, and instead of showing me the relevant posts&#8211; which is, after all, why I go to Technorati&#8211; it shows me links to YouTube &#038; Flickr. Which is fine &#038; all, but that&#8217;s not why I&#8217;m there.</p>
<p>Worst, when I clicked on posts, it claimed there were no results for Catalina Marathon. Which is utterly bogus, since I visited at least a half dozen less than 2 months ago&#8211; and that was only for this year&#8217;s race.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m missing something, but right now it looks broken to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/new-technorati-looks-great.html/comment-page-1#comment-7533</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1157#comment-7533</guid>
		<description>The new design looks great, but is it just me or is the new Technorati also &lt;i&gt;faster&lt;/i&gt;, too? It seems much more snappy and responsive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new design looks great, but is it just me or is the new Technorati also <i>faster</i>, too? It seems much more snappy and responsive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
