<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr and Yahoo Take Another Step Towards Integrating Flickr Into Yahoo Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/flickr-and-yahoo-take-another-step.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/flickr-and-yahoo-take-another-step.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:15:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/flickr-and-yahoo-take-another-step.html/comment-page-1#comment-7928</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1182#comment-7928</guid>
		<description>I guess Thomas is happy as long as his pictures get better exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Thomas is happy as long as his pictures get better exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hitesh Sawlani</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/flickr-and-yahoo-take-another-step.html/comment-page-1#comment-7929</link>
		<dc:creator>Hitesh Sawlani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1182#comment-7929</guid>
		<description>Meh who decides what a landmark is then?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Type in Stonehenge.. it works, type in Eiffel tower and it doesn&#039;t.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It will only really be useful if they cover a lot more than landmarks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Till then, it&#039;s always easier to go to flickr and use the search there..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In any case Google will probably see this as a threat etc.. I wonder if they respond by buying out a promising website (Zooomr?!) to match the service!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh who decides what a landmark is then?</p>
<p>Type in Stonehenge.. it works, type in Eiffel tower and it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It will only really be useful if they cover a lot more than landmarks.</p>
<p>Till then, it&#8217;s always easier to go to flickr and use the search there..</p>
<p>In any case Google will probably see this as a threat etc.. I wonder if they respond by buying out a promising website (Zooomr?!) to match the service!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venugopal</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/05/flickr-and-yahoo-take-another-step.html/comment-page-1#comment-7930</link>
		<dc:creator>Venugopal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1182#comment-7930</guid>
		<description>Nice post. One thing I do not see to understand. why the social networking sites need the regular search too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We search for &#039;Goldengate&#039; in yahoo and it shows the images from flickr. Now I go to flickr, no way to come back or seemlessly continue my search. Same with Y! Answers. They should close the loop and it should be seemless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. One thing I do not see to understand. why the social networking sites need the regular search too.</p>
<p>We search for &#8216;Goldengate&#8217; in yahoo and it shows the images from flickr. Now I go to flickr, no way to come back or seemlessly continue my search. Same with Y! Answers. They should close the loop and it should be seemless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
