<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dave Winer and Michael Gartenberg on Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/dave-winer-on-twitter.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/dave-winer-on-twitter.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steelsun</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/dave-winer-on-twitter.html/comment-page-1#comment-8844</link>
		<dc:creator>Steelsun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1313#comment-8844</guid>
		<description>Also don&#039;t see the compelling need here for Twitter.&lt;br /&gt;Blog Rolls or RSS feeds will tell me what the people I like to read have new on their blogs/sites.&lt;br /&gt;IMs will work for IMing.&lt;br /&gt;Twitter to me seems a folly for the commercial brained (as in 30 second attention spanned morons).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also don&#8217;t see the compelling need here for Twitter.<br />Blog Rolls or RSS feeds will tell me what the people I like to read have new on their blogs/sites.<br />IMs will work for IMing.<br />Twitter to me seems a folly for the commercial brained (as in 30 second attention spanned morons).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Parker</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/dave-winer-on-twitter.html/comment-page-1#comment-8845</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1313#comment-8845</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m unsure of how I feel about twitter. I use it, and I&#039;ve got a lot of mixed feelings about it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bad:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- The IM-client seems to work sparingly for me&lt;br /&gt;- The website is ridiculously slow&lt;br /&gt;- The javascript to utilize on my blog brings rendering my webpage to it&#039;s knees&lt;br /&gt;- People tend to use it as an IM, which in my opinion it shouldn&#039;t be (&quot;@Sue LOL&quot;)&lt;br /&gt;- Not a lot of people I care to follow on it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Good:&lt;br /&gt;- Most of my points above are technical, and &#039;easily&#039; solvable (i.e., not systemic of a bad idea)&lt;br /&gt;- It&#039;s new.  So people are using it  in ways that I find contrary to it&#039;s usefulness, but perhaps one of us will change (people will use it for what it&#039;s best for, or I&#039;ll change my mind. :) )&lt;br /&gt;- It&#039;s a great way of delivering content in micro-bursts.  Some things are not blog-post worthy (&quot;Hey, found this great site: blah.com - I&#039;ll have to explore&quot;), and might be good for mass people to see.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The biggest problem I see so far, for me, is that there&#039;s not a lot of people I like to follow on it.  I&#039;ve got Kristopher and Thomas Hawk on it, and I enjoy the &#039;twitters&#039; I get about new things in blogospheria, as well as Zooomr/etc.  Ideally if I could get  other people to publish using twitter (Steve Wozniak/Jobs, Will Wright, Warren Spector, etc.), I&#039;d feel more compelled.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyhow, I think it&#039;s a great idea, it just needs to carve out it&#039;s niche more fully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m unsure of how I feel about twitter. I use it, and I&#8217;ve got a lot of mixed feelings about it.</p>
<p>The bad:</p>
<p>- The IM-client seems to work sparingly for me<br />- The website is ridiculously slow<br />- The javascript to utilize on my blog brings rendering my webpage to it&#8217;s knees<br />- People tend to use it as an IM, which in my opinion it shouldn&#8217;t be (&#8220;@Sue LOL&#8221;)<br />- Not a lot of people I care to follow on it.</p>
<p>The Good:<br />- Most of my points above are technical, and &#8216;easily&#8217; solvable (i.e., not systemic of a bad idea)<br />- It&#8217;s new.  So people are using it  in ways that I find contrary to it&#8217;s usefulness, but perhaps one of us will change (people will use it for what it&#8217;s best for, or I&#8217;ll change my mind. <img src='http://thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )<br />- It&#8217;s a great way of delivering content in micro-bursts.  Some things are not blog-post worthy (&#8220;Hey, found this great site: blah.com &#8211; I&#8217;ll have to explore&#8221;), and might be good for mass people to see.</p>
<p>The biggest problem I see so far, for me, is that there&#8217;s not a lot of people I like to follow on it.  I&#8217;ve got Kristopher and Thomas Hawk on it, and I enjoy the &#8216;twitters&#8217; I get about new things in blogospheria, as well as Zooomr/etc.  Ideally if I could get  other people to publish using twitter (Steve Wozniak/Jobs, Will Wright, Warren Spector, etc.), I&#8217;d feel more compelled.</p>
<p>Anyhow, I think it&#8217;s a great idea, it just needs to carve out it&#8217;s niche more fully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Oster</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/dave-winer-on-twitter.html/comment-page-1#comment-8846</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Oster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1313#comment-8846</guid>
		<description>Twitter makes a lot of sense, it combines a lot of guilty pleasures into one service, those being:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Voyeurism aka Reality Shows (Oh, look what Sue is doing, she just twittered that she&#039;s on her second martini and to not wait up, I wonder if she&#039;s with that guy?).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Vanity (Hey, everyone, look at me!  Look at what I&#039;m doing!)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Laziness (I really don&#039;t have the time to write a full blog post, I&#039;ll just drop a little note).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While it may seem I&#039;m disparaging Twitter I&#039;m not, not exactly.  I really does hit a lot of social buttons.  You can quickly ingest it vs. reading a blog, you can easily gain a lot of subscribers since it is so quick people are more willing to sample and since twitters are so small you don&#039;t have to feel guilty about having so many.  Really Twitter is the fast-food of blogging.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Personally I don&#039;t find any use in it, but then again I didn&#039;t find any use in blogging when it was just people posting to their LiveJournal accounts.  It wasn&#039;t until blogs actually started enriching my life with news and programming tidbits that I started enjoying them.  For Twitter to last longer than a South Beach night club it needs to gain some kind of enriching vs. distracting quality.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So Twitter, or something like it, will probably be around in a year, but I doubt very much that it&#039;ll be in it&#039;s current form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter makes a lot of sense, it combines a lot of guilty pleasures into one service, those being:</p>
<p>1. Voyeurism aka Reality Shows (Oh, look what Sue is doing, she just twittered that she&#8217;s on her second martini and to not wait up, I wonder if she&#8217;s with that guy?).</p>
<p>2. Vanity (Hey, everyone, look at me!  Look at what I&#8217;m doing!)</p>
<p>3. Laziness (I really don&#8217;t have the time to write a full blog post, I&#8217;ll just drop a little note).</p>
<p>While it may seem I&#8217;m disparaging Twitter I&#8217;m not, not exactly.  I really does hit a lot of social buttons.  You can quickly ingest it vs. reading a blog, you can easily gain a lot of subscribers since it is so quick people are more willing to sample and since twitters are so small you don&#8217;t have to feel guilty about having so many.  Really Twitter is the fast-food of blogging.</p>
<p>Personally I don&#8217;t find any use in it, but then again I didn&#8217;t find any use in blogging when it was just people posting to their LiveJournal accounts.  It wasn&#8217;t until blogs actually started enriching my life with news and programming tidbits that I started enjoying them.  For Twitter to last longer than a South Beach night club it needs to gain some kind of enriching vs. distracting quality.</p>
<p>So Twitter, or something like it, will probably be around in a year, but I doubt very much that it&#8217;ll be in it&#8217;s current form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/dave-winer-on-twitter.html/comment-page-1#comment-8847</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1313#comment-8847</guid>
		<description>Thank GOD Dave Winer saw the light.  Now Twitter is officially okay.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank GOD Dave Winer saw the light.  Now Twitter is officially okay.</p>
<p>*sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/dave-winer-on-twitter.html/comment-page-1#comment-8848</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1313#comment-8848</guid>
		<description>The only problem with Dave&#039;s logic (there are so often problems with his logic) is that on one hand he claims, &quot;Whenever so many people are so excited about something there must be some substance&quot; yet he goes on to discount George Bush&#039;s stupidity, when clearly, many, many people believe it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with Dave&#8217;s logic (there are so often problems with his logic) is that on one hand he claims, &#8220;Whenever so many people are so excited about something there must be some substance&#8221; yet he goes on to discount George Bush&#8217;s stupidity, when clearly, many, many people believe it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2007/03/dave-winer-on-twitter.html/comment-page-1#comment-8849</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1313#comment-8849</guid>
		<description>My first reaction to Twitter was &quot;Why?&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After trying it out I see the light.  Like most new social networking sites/applications this does seem like a solution to an unidentified problem. In its current form its fun and a great extension of my individual web marketing efforts, but I can easily see a product being provided for customers to create privatge sub-networks. I&#039;d easily use it in that form for a corporate user conference or embedded in a corporate intranet. That seems to be a ways off though. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its current form I&#039;m still not convinced its for everyone though and its a bit abstract to pitch to others. In the mean time I&#039;ll enjoy it for what it is and continue to get updates from Borat, John Edwards and the other techies in my network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first reaction to Twitter was &#8220;Why?&#8221;</p>
<p>After trying it out I see the light.  Like most new social networking sites/applications this does seem like a solution to an unidentified problem. In its current form its fun and a great extension of my individual web marketing efforts, but I can easily see a product being provided for customers to create privatge sub-networks. I&#8217;d easily use it in that form for a corporate user conference or embedded in a corporate intranet. That seems to be a ways off though. </p>
<p>In its current form I&#8217;m still not convinced its for everyone though and its a bit abstract to pitch to others. In the mean time I&#8217;ll enjoy it for what it is and continue to get updates from Borat, John Edwards and the other techies in my network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

