<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Digg Layout Looks Great</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/new-digg-layout-looks-great.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/new-digg-layout-looks-great.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Davis</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/new-digg-layout-looks-great.html/comment-page-1#comment-10739</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1540#comment-10739</guid>
		<description>For some reason using the new layout on Linux with Firefox 2, all of the cpu cycles get eaten up as a result i no longer bother using digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason using the new layout on Linux with Firefox 2, all of the cpu cycles get eaten up as a result i no longer bother using digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Anderson</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/new-digg-layout-looks-great.html/comment-page-1#comment-10740</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1540#comment-10740</guid>
		<description>Was there a problem with the old layout? Maybe consistency is the hobgoblin on small minds, but I rather like it when a site keeps the same overall look. Did they think people were bored with the old look and would stop coming to the site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there a problem with the old layout? Maybe consistency is the hobgoblin on small minds, but I rather like it when a site keeps the same overall look. Did they think people were bored with the old look and would stop coming to the site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan j Budke</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/new-digg-layout-looks-great.html/comment-page-1#comment-10741</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan j Budke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1540#comment-10741</guid>
		<description>Looks very much like Netscape&#039;s layout. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks very much like Netscape&#8217;s layout. <img src='http://thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

