Comments on: Google Image Search 2nd Only to Text Search at Google http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/google-image-search-2nd-only-to-text.html Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:33:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Ron Diorio http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/google-image-search-2nd-only-to-text.html/comment-page-1#comment-11129 Ron Diorio Sat, 02 Dec 2006 01:19:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1596#comment-11129 I know I sound like a broken record but why doesn't Flickr just throw the video upload switch and let this very dedicated community develop into the leading shared orginal content video service. I know I sound like a broken record but why doesn’t Flickr just throw the video upload switch and let this very dedicated community develop into the leading shared orginal content video service.

]]> By: Clazh http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/google-image-search-2nd-only-to-text.html/comment-page-1#comment-11130 Clazh Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:32:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1596#comment-11130 You know Google is throughly overrated. It has two big monsters under its hold Adsense/adwords and Search. That all rest of it services are mediocre. You know Google is throughly overrated. It has two big monsters under its hold Adsense/adwords and Search. That all rest of it services are mediocre.

]]> By: Anonymous http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/google-image-search-2nd-only-to-text.html/comment-page-1#comment-11131 Anonymous Fri, 01 Dec 2006 18:15:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1596#comment-11131 you should look at this video (a tech talk at google HQs) to know what others are doing to provide the best possible search results.<br /><br />http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8246463980976635143&q;=tech+talk&hl;=en<br /><br />along the lines of having some editorial touch, but way smarter, effective and entertaining...<br /><br />Diego Bauducco<br />http://www.db798.com/pictobrowser you should look at this video (a tech talk at google HQs) to know what others are doing to provide the best possible search results.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8246463980976635143&q;=tech+talk&hl;=en

along the lines of having some editorial touch, but way smarter, effective and entertaining…

Diego Bauducco
http://www.db798.com/pictobrowser

]]> By: LeggNet http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/google-image-search-2nd-only-to-text.html/comment-page-1#comment-11132 LeggNet Fri, 01 Dec 2006 11:26:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1596#comment-11132 I agree that Google should pour some resources into their image search. While it works "okay", it could definitely be better.<br /><br />I have found when doing a "quick & dirty" search for an image that Google's results work well (based on the results on the front page). However, by digging deeper into their results you can many times find a more relevant result.<br /><br />I have benefited a bit on my photoblog (leggnet.com) from Google Image search. My shot of Travis Barker (Blink182 drummer) has made it into the top ten results when searching for his name. This has resulted in quite a bit of traffic each day from the search.<br /><br />I look forward to the day that Google integrates a more realistic keyword into their image database. I agree that Google should pour some resources into their image search. While it works “okay”, it could definitely be better.

I have found when doing a “quick & dirty” search for an image that Google’s results work well (based on the results on the front page). However, by digging deeper into their results you can many times find a more relevant result.

I have benefited a bit on my photoblog (leggnet.com) from Google Image search. My shot of Travis Barker (Blink182 drummer) has made it into the top ten results when searching for his name. This has resulted in quite a bit of traffic each day from the search.

I look forward to the day that Google integrates a more realistic keyword into their image database.

]]> By: Henrik http://thomashawk.com/2006/12/google-image-search-2nd-only-to-text.html/comment-page-1#comment-11133 Henrik Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:34:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1596#comment-11133 Since you have been looking around, how does http://search.live.com/images/ stack in the general comparison? As far as I can see there are much more monkeys and much less other things in the results. Since you have been looking around, how does http://search.live.com/images/ stack in the general comparison? As far as I can see there are much more monkeys and much less other things in the results.

]]>