<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should CNET be Sold and to Whom?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/should-cnet-be-sold-and-to-whom.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/should-cnet-be-sold-and-to-whom.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimo C</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/should-cnet-be-sold-and-to-whom.html/comment-page-1#comment-11679</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimo C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1718#comment-11679</guid>
		<description>Many are feeling there is already enough of a media monopoly in the bay area.  If one agrees, then a seperate Cnet would be the preference.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We used to have two newspapers in this town, now we have one. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;more here:&lt;br /&gt;http://penpressclub.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many are feeling there is already enough of a media monopoly in the bay area.  If one agrees, then a seperate Cnet would be the preference.</p>
<p>We used to have two newspapers in this town, now we have one. </p>
<p>more here:<br /><a href="http://penpressclub.org/" rel="nofollow">http://penpressclub.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kip</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/should-cnet-be-sold-and-to-whom.html/comment-page-1#comment-11680</link>
		<dc:creator>kip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1718#comment-11680</guid>
		<description>True but doesn;t google hate CNET citing their one year ban on talking with CNET a few years back? Would be a great idea for Google to start owning some of their content as they are only buying time by being a data redistributor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True but doesn;t google hate CNET citing their one year ban on talking with CNET a few years back? Would be a great idea for Google to start owning some of their content as they are only buying time by being a data redistributor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

