<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Difference in Working With Good People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/difference-in-working-with-good-people.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/difference-in-working-with-good-people.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Reifer</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/difference-in-working-with-good-people.html/comment-page-1#comment-11634</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Reifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1696#comment-11634</guid>
		<description>Tom - &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for your thoughts. I don&#039;t doubt that Derek and Heather have the best intentions, and the community oriented spirit definitely shows through in JPG&#039;s messaging. My point was to give neutral, constructive criticism about some vague portions of their image licensing agreement. Having a lawyer spell out the terms, and being more clear about book and gallery usage would make me feel more comfortable. I thought Derek&#039;s response was great, and that he was open enough to accept my comments in a constructive way shows that you are right about him being a cool guy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; </p>
<p>Thanks for your thoughts. I don&#8217;t doubt that Derek and Heather have the best intentions, and the community oriented spirit definitely shows through in JPG&#8217;s messaging. My point was to give neutral, constructive criticism about some vague portions of their image licensing agreement. Having a lawyer spell out the terms, and being more clear about book and gallery usage would make me feel more comfortable. I thought Derek&#8217;s response was great, and that he was open enough to accept my comments in a constructive way shows that you are right about him being a cool guy.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

