<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe&#8217;s Bridge, Where Have You Been Hiding My Whole Life?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnie1</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/comment-page-1#comment-11648</link>
		<dc:creator>johnie1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1704#comment-11648</guid>
		<description>Loved the shows (subscribed the Photoshop Online). Will watch out for further Photowalking, top work Chap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the shows (subscribed the Photoshop Online). Will watch out for further Photowalking, top work Chap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Limprecht</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/comment-page-1#comment-11649</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Limprecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1704#comment-11649</guid>
		<description>I use Camera Raw exclusively now.  Photoshop is overwhelming without a lot of practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Camera Raw exclusively now.  Photoshop is overwhelming without a lot of practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Reifer</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/comment-page-1#comment-11650</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Reifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1704#comment-11650</guid>
		<description>Tom - &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bridge can be a useful program, and it&#039;s part of my workflow. One unheralded advantage of using Bridge as browsing software is the previews are built from the actual files, which confirms file integrity. If there is a problem with corrupted RAW files, usually you&#039;ll know right away.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the volume of images you are shooting, Photo Mechanic would be a much better application. Photo Mechanic is used by a lot of high volume event and sports shooters because the previews build so fast, and tasks like renaming and keywording can be an automated part of the import process. Sorting and rating 200-300 images a day will be so much faster than Bridge it will make your head swim.&lt;br /&gt;http://www.camerabits.com/pages/PM4.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you haven&#039;t read Peter Krogh&#039;s The DAM Book, there is no time like the present. This book is the gold standard for everything that needs to happen after you press the shutter release. http://www.thedambook.com/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My rather meticulous workflow uses Bridge and iView Media Pro - but when you&#039;re taking 10 minute long exposures, you don&#039;t have a lot of volume. :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; </p>
<p>Bridge can be a useful program, and it&#8217;s part of my workflow. One unheralded advantage of using Bridge as browsing software is the previews are built from the actual files, which confirms file integrity. If there is a problem with corrupted RAW files, usually you&#8217;ll know right away.</p>
<p>For the volume of images you are shooting, Photo Mechanic would be a much better application. Photo Mechanic is used by a lot of high volume event and sports shooters because the previews build so fast, and tasks like renaming and keywording can be an automated part of the import process. Sorting and rating 200-300 images a day will be so much faster than Bridge it will make your head swim.<br /><a href="http://www.camerabits.com/pages/PM4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.camerabits.com/pages/PM4.html</a></p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t read Peter Krogh&#8217;s The DAM Book, there is no time like the present. This book is the gold standard for everything that needs to happen after you press the shutter release. <a href="http://www.thedambook.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedambook.com/</a></p>
<p>My rather meticulous workflow uses Bridge and iView Media Pro &#8211; but when you&#8217;re taking 10 minute long exposures, you don&#8217;t have a lot of volume. <img src='http://thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas in IL</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/comment-page-1#comment-11651</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas in IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1704#comment-11651</guid>
		<description>Hey Thomas,  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do you have any idea when the videos from the 2nd Photowalk tour are going to be posted as well the one from October 7th:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/more-photowalking-with-robert-scoble.html#comments&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just curious and cannot wait to see all these videos!!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thomas in IL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Thomas,  </p>
<p>Do you have any idea when the videos from the 2nd Photowalk tour are going to be posted as well the one from October 7th:</p>
<p><a href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/more-photowalking-with-robert-scoble.html#comments" rel="nofollow">http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/more-photowalking-with-robert-scoble.html#comments</a></p>
<p>Just curious and cannot wait to see all these videos!!</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Thomas in IL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Crabbe</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/comment-page-1#comment-11652</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Crabbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1704#comment-11652</guid>
		<description>I actaully am surprised - A photo/tech-head like you, not aware of or using bridge? OMG!  :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&#039;t know how I managed without it for my own library. In fact, I haven&#039;t needed any other catalog management software, especially for editing raw files w/ ACR and PSCS2.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have fun w/ it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actaully am surprised &#8211; A photo/tech-head like you, not aware of or using bridge? OMG!  <img src='http://thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how I managed without it for my own library. In fact, I haven&#8217;t needed any other catalog management software, especially for editing raw files w/ ACR and PSCS2.</p>
<p>Have fun w/ it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hawk</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/comment-page-1#comment-11653</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1704#comment-11653</guid>
		<description>Hey flightblog, I haven&#039;t tried Lightroom yet but Jan also had very positive things to say about Lightrooom as well.  Apparently it is in free beta right now.  I&#039;m going to have to try that out next.  Although now all of a sudden I&#039;m kind of attached to Bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey flightblog, I haven&#8217;t tried Lightroom yet but Jan also had very positive things to say about Lightrooom as well.  Apparently it is in free beta right now.  I&#8217;m going to have to try that out next.  Although now all of a sudden I&#8217;m kind of attached to Bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeggNet</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/comment-page-1#comment-11654</link>
		<dc:creator>LeggNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1704#comment-11654</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up about Bridge.  Your RAW workflow sounds very similar to mine - painstaking.  I just ran Bridge and must say that I agree.  I have avoided shooting RAW for my day-to-day stuff and only used it for the really important stuff.  With the ease of workflow that Bridge affords, I am going to move over to RAW only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up about Bridge.  Your RAW workflow sounds very similar to mine &#8211; painstaking.  I just ran Bridge and must say that I agree.  I have avoided shooting RAW for my day-to-day stuff and only used it for the really important stuff.  With the ease of workflow that Bridge affords, I am going to move over to RAW only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ade</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/comment-page-1#comment-11655</link>
		<dc:creator>Ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1704#comment-11655</guid>
		<description>Yes... Bridge is excellent for managing large numbers of RAW files. You don&#039;t even need to open them in Photoshop at all - you can select a whole folder-full and adjust all their RAW conversion settings right there in Bridge. How did you manage without all this time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230; Bridge is excellent for managing large numbers of RAW files. You don&#8217;t even need to open them in Photoshop at all &#8211; you can select a whole folder-full and adjust all their RAW conversion settings right there in Bridge. How did you manage without all this time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flightblog</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/10/adobes-bridge-where-have-you-been.html/comment-page-1#comment-11656</link>
		<dc:creator>flightblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1704#comment-11656</guid>
		<description>Great post!  I was wondering how you managed your huge volume of photos.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have you tried Adobe Lightroom for RAW image editing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  I was wondering how you managed your huge volume of photos.</p>
<p>Have you tried Adobe Lightroom for RAW image editing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

