<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No HDTV for 32 Bit PCs with Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/no-hdtv-for-32-bit-pcs-with-vista.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/no-hdtv-for-32-bit-pcs-with-vista.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Warne</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/no-hdtv-for-32-bit-pcs-with-vista.html/comment-page-1#comment-12352</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Warne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1851#comment-12352</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to point out though that the &quot;bad information&quot; was provided by Microsoft, not me (the journalist who wrote the original story.) I transcribed exactly what Microsoft&#039;s Senior Program Manager said in his presentation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Besides if you ask me, Microsoft is just playing semantics. They&#039;re saying &quot;Windows itself won&#039;t stop you... it&#039;s the DRM software that might.&quot; But that&#039;s not too different to what they said yesterday; they said they were being pressured by the content companies and that was why the decision was made. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I asked Microsoft for a list of DRM systems that will allow protected high definition playback in Vista 32 bit and so far there has been deafening silence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My guess is that the way it will pan out is that none of the HD codecs/DRM models will work in Vista 32 bit (or ship with it), and I imagine this is what Steve Riley was saying in his presentation yesterday. (I&#039;m happy to stand corrected though if Microsoft is able to name some high-def content protection systems that WILL work in Vista 32 bit.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to point out though that the &#8220;bad information&#8221; was provided by Microsoft, not me (the journalist who wrote the original story.) I transcribed exactly what Microsoft&#8217;s Senior Program Manager said in his presentation.</p>
<p>Besides if you ask me, Microsoft is just playing semantics. They&#8217;re saying &#8220;Windows itself won&#8217;t stop you&#8230; it&#8217;s the DRM software that might.&#8221; But that&#8217;s not too different to what they said yesterday; they said they were being pressured by the content companies and that was why the decision was made. </p>
<p>I asked Microsoft for a list of DRM systems that will allow protected high definition playback in Vista 32 bit and so far there has been deafening silence. </p>
<p>My guess is that the way it will pan out is that none of the HD codecs/DRM models will work in Vista 32 bit (or ship with it), and I imagine this is what Steve Riley was saying in his presentation yesterday. (I&#8217;m happy to stand corrected though if Microsoft is able to name some high-def content protection systems that WILL work in Vista 32 bit.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

