<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arrington Says Flickr to Launch Geotagging Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/arrington-says-flickr-to-launch.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/arrington-says-flickr-to-launch.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ade</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/arrington-says-flickr-to-launch.html/comment-page-1#comment-12330</link>
		<dc:creator>Ade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1845#comment-12330</guid>
		<description>The Flickr UI technology side of it is great, but it relies so much on the map. Not only is the map data hopeless outside the US, but the Yahoo Maps technology is &lt;em&gt;way&lt;/em&gt; behind both Google and Microsoft&#039;s offerings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I love Flickr but it got &lt;a href=&quot;http://gridrunner.blogspot.com/2006/08/flickr-has-added-mapping-tool.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; title=&quot;blog post from Ade Rowbotham&quot;&gt;a scathing review from me&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Flickr UI technology side of it is great, but it relies so much on the map. Not only is the map data hopeless outside the US, but the Yahoo Maps technology is <em>way</em> behind both Google and Microsoft&#8217;s offerings.</p>
<p>I love Flickr but it got <a href="http://gridrunner.blogspot.com/2006/08/flickr-has-added-mapping-tool.html" rel="nofollow" title="blog post from Ade Rowbotham">a scathing review from me</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/arrington-says-flickr-to-launch.html/comment-page-1#comment-12331</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1845#comment-12331</guid>
		<description>We hear you loud and clear on street level detail for Europe and beyond.   We’ve been working hard to rollout more international data and imagery over the last few months and will keep it coming. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the meantime, we’re focusing on keeping a good balance of global coverage.  If you’re geotagging photos from a recent trip from outside the US, Europe, or Japan, you should find major cities, towns and road networks for every country.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-Scott Regan, Yahoo! Maps team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We hear you loud and clear on street level detail for Europe and beyond.   We’ve been working hard to rollout more international data and imagery over the last few months and will keep it coming. </p>
<p>In the meantime, we’re focusing on keeping a good balance of global coverage.  If you’re geotagging photos from a recent trip from outside the US, Europe, or Japan, you should find major cities, towns and road networks for every country.</p>
<p>-Scott Regan, Yahoo! Maps team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/arrington-says-flickr-to-launch.html/comment-page-1#comment-12332</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1845#comment-12332</guid>
		<description>Yahoo&#039;s UK maps are nothing short of attrocious. Its just completely killed any value in this service, which is a shame as its implemented into Flickr rather well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo&#8217;s UK maps are nothing short of attrocious. Its just completely killed any value in this service, which is a shame as its implemented into Flickr rather well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinny</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/arrington-says-flickr-to-launch.html/comment-page-1#comment-12333</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1845#comment-12333</guid>
		<description>Now, before you all flame me, I think the implementation of flickr&#039;s geotagging KILLS Zooomr&#039;s.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That being said, can we now say that flickr is basically a copy of zooomr, seeing as they blatantly used this feature that existed elsewhere?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Obviously not.  Just trying to make the point how ridiculous the &quot;you copied me&quot; argument is and how that Wikipedia entry is even more offensive a few weeks later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, before you all flame me, I think the implementation of flickr&#8217;s geotagging KILLS Zooomr&#8217;s.</p>
<p>That being said, can we now say that flickr is basically a copy of zooomr, seeing as they blatantly used this feature that existed elsewhere?</p>
<p>Obviously not.  Just trying to make the point how ridiculous the &#8220;you copied me&#8221; argument is and how that Wikipedia entry is even more offensive a few weeks later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/arrington-says-flickr-to-launch.html/comment-page-1#comment-12334</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1845#comment-12334</guid>
		<description>Yeah, level of detail for the UK is really bad compared to both Google and MSN, and I don&#039;t just mean their satellite imagary, their road maps go only to a city level (1km/1mile) range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, level of detail for the UK is really bad compared to both Google and MSN, and I don&#8217;t just mean their satellite imagary, their road maps go only to a city level (1km/1mile) range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/arrington-says-flickr-to-launch.html/comment-page-1#comment-12335</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1845#comment-12335</guid>
		<description>Sounds promising - I must have a go at Geotagging on Zooomr as well - UK detail could be a problem.... fingers crossed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds promising &#8211; I must have a go at Geotagging on Zooomr as well &#8211; UK detail could be a problem&#8230;. fingers crossed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair James</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/08/arrington-says-flickr-to-launch.html/comment-page-1#comment-12336</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=1845#comment-12336</guid>
		<description>Good point about google v yahoo maps. In my experiments working on www.mapsack.com I found that yahoo&#039;s level of detail is very bad outside the us. I also dont find the maps quite as responsive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about google v yahoo maps. In my experiments working on <a href="http://www.mapsack.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mapsack.com</a> I found that yahoo&#8217;s level of detail is very bad outside the us. I also dont find the maps quite as responsive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

