<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spout.com, the Flickrization of Movie Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-search.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-search.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: web movie pedia Spout, The Flickrization of Movie Search</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-514707</link>
		<dc:creator>web movie pedia Spout, The Flickrization of Movie Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 23:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2055#comment-514707</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to read more: thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-se&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to read more: thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-se&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spout, The Flickrization of Movie Search &#124; watch online films</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-440374</link>
		<dc:creator>Spout, The Flickrization of Movie Search &#124; watch online films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2055#comment-440374</guid>
		<description>[...] here to read more: thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-se&#8230;   This entry was posted in All Movies Online and tagged Flickrization, Movie, Search, Spout. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to read more: thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-se&#8230;   This entry was posted in All Movies Online and tagged Flickrization, Movie, Search, Spout. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: high equivalency test</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-298089</link>
		<dc:creator>high equivalency test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2055#comment-298089</guid>
		<description>That is a handful of inspirational stuff. In no way knew that opinions could be this varied. Thanks for all the enthusiasm to offer you such helpful information here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a handful of inspirational stuff. In no way knew that opinions could be this varied. Thanks for all the enthusiasm to offer you such helpful information here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-14539</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2055#comment-14539</guid>
		<description>Funny, I barely notice the tags when I&#039;m on Spout, see them more as interesting word-poems or wall art. But I do get caught up reading the lists of people whose tastes are similar to mine. In just a few visits my &quot;I want to see it&quot; list is so much bigger and better and more interesting. That&#039;s addictive. I do work with Spout, so perhaps understand the site better than the casual visitor. But I know they&#039;re user testing to make its best uses more obvious. Maybe Netflix should just hand over their million-dollar bounty to these guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I barely notice the tags when I&#8217;m on Spout, see them more as interesting word-poems or wall art. But I do get caught up reading the lists of people whose tastes are similar to mine. In just a few visits my &#8220;I want to see it&#8221; list is so much bigger and better and more interesting. That&#8217;s addictive. I do work with Spout, so perhaps understand the site better than the casual visitor. But I know they&#8217;re user testing to make its best uses more obvious. Maybe Netflix should just hand over their million-dollar bounty to these guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattbg</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-14540</link>
		<dc:creator>mattbg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 06:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2055#comment-14540</guid>
		<description>Davis, I like the idea of Spout, but I&#039;ve already had a browse through at some of the tags and I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s going to work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The tags that really do work are little more than genre tags&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The things that really attract people to movies at a deep level can&#039;t be expressed with keywords, or at least not keywords that can be shared amongst other people. You might absolutely love one particular &quot;coming of age&quot; (tag) movie while being indifferent to others. I don&#039;t find tags reliable. If it can&#039;t be done with music (Pandora, Last.fm, etc. don&#039;t work, IMO), movies are an even bigger challenge. You need a combination of refined tags, and the more refined your tags become, the less likely someone will use the same descriptive words.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I wonder how much better tags are as compared to just finding a collection of movie reviewers who have very similar tastes to your own, and using their movie ratings as a guide?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve already seen tags like &quot;pretentious&quot; and &quot;pudding boobs&quot; being used to tag movies on Spout. What good is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Davis, I like the idea of Spout, but I&#8217;ve already had a browse through at some of the tags and I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s going to work.</p>
<p>The tags that really do work are little more than genre tags</p>
<p>The things that really attract people to movies at a deep level can&#8217;t be expressed with keywords, or at least not keywords that can be shared amongst other people. You might absolutely love one particular &#8220;coming of age&#8221; (tag) movie while being indifferent to others. I don&#8217;t find tags reliable. If it can&#8217;t be done with music (Pandora, Last.fm, etc. don&#8217;t work, IMO), movies are an even bigger challenge. You need a combination of refined tags, and the more refined your tags become, the less likely someone will use the same descriptive words.</p>
<p>I wonder how much better tags are as compared to just finding a collection of movie reviewers who have very similar tastes to your own, and using their movie ratings as a guide?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already seen tags like &#8220;pretentious&#8221; and &#8220;pudding boobs&#8221; being used to tag movies on Spout. What good is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-14541</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis Freeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2055#comment-14541</guid>
		<description>I think that there are different benefits for all types of users.  IMDB is a great resource for films, but it&#039;s pretty bad if you want to explore new films.  Spout&#039;s tagging system is designed more for you to go to your favorite films and then explore other films that might have similar sub characters that you enjoy.  As a casual user of Spout you&#039;ll probably get the most benefit by using the user generated content to find you favorite films.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I don&#039;t have an IMDB account and with Netflix capping me at 500 discs, there is a real benefit for me to use the service more extensively.  By keeping track of lists, I can build a queue outside of Netflix that is independent of any &quot;Netflix Reccomendation&quot; that could be based more on profits and less on refined search.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you take the service one level further and participate in the groups and blogging, you&#039;ll find that Spout offers a community benefit for those most involved.  While this isn&#039;t appealling to everyone, there are a lot of people who find that common movies can create great friendships.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think the key to Spout is to decide what your needs are and to use it appropriately.  If I want to find new films I can use Spout and if I need hard facts and history about a film, that the IMDB will be the first place I go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there are different benefits for all types of users.  IMDB is a great resource for films, but it&#8217;s pretty bad if you want to explore new films.  Spout&#8217;s tagging system is designed more for you to go to your favorite films and then explore other films that might have similar sub characters that you enjoy.  As a casual user of Spout you&#8217;ll probably get the most benefit by using the user generated content to find you favorite films.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have an IMDB account and with Netflix capping me at 500 discs, there is a real benefit for me to use the service more extensively.  By keeping track of lists, I can build a queue outside of Netflix that is independent of any &#8220;Netflix Reccomendation&#8221; that could be based more on profits and less on refined search.</p>
<p>If you take the service one level further and participate in the groups and blogging, you&#8217;ll find that Spout offers a community benefit for those most involved.  While this isn&#8217;t appealling to everyone, there are a lot of people who find that common movies can create great friendships.</p>
<p>I think the key to Spout is to decide what your needs are and to use it appropriately.  If I want to find new films I can use Spout and if I need hard facts and history about a film, that the IMDB will be the first place I go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattbg</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/05/spoutcom-flickrization-of-movie-search.html/comment-page-1#comment-14542</link>
		<dc:creator>mattbg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2055#comment-14542</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a nice idea, and I&#039;ll probably browse it every so often, but I won&#039;t use it until it&#039;s been bought by Amazon and integrated into IMDB.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I already maintain personal information in two online movie databases (IMDB and the online rental service that I use), and I don&#039;t need to have the hassle of keeping track of a third.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice idea, and I&#8217;ll probably browse it every so often, but I won&#8217;t use it until it&#8217;s been bought by Amazon and integrated into IMDB.</p>
<p>I already maintain personal information in two online movie databases (IMDB and the online rental service that I use), and I don&#8217;t need to have the hassle of keeping track of a third.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

