<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Argues It Has Ways to Prevent Manipulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/03/digg-argues-it-has-ways-to-prevent.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/03/digg-argues-it-has-ways-to-prevent.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/03/digg-argues-it-has-ways-to-prevent.html/comment-page-1#comment-15570</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2221#comment-15570</guid>
		<description>Color me unconvinced...at the moment. I like Digg, too, but too many stories recently have been links to questionable sources - blogs with videos of Google OS, for example, or a 14 year old hired by Google.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One common misconception is that a high number of Diggs gives the story authenticity. One often has to read deep into the comments before a sense of balance is achieved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And I don&#039;t know how much faith I have in swarm behavior to identify and promote important stories or memes. Most of what&#039;s on Digg will be on BoingBoing, MeFi or their ilk within a day anyway, so it&#039;s not like Digg is really uncovering anything substantial or new....Digg still relies on &quot;traditional&quot; media to provide it with something to Digg.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Digg has some trials coming, however. I predict at least ONE major con-job via Digg, most likely a character-assassination of some kind, followed by the invariable lawsuits.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think I&#039;d also point to your story, TH, about PriceRite. While the story was certainly interesting (the vigilante narrative appeals so much to the techy crowd), I don&#039;t think it was deserving of the massive attention it garnered. Yes, PriceRite&#039;s a bunch of assholes, but I think there are more socially responsible things to be doing with our outrage than outing some two-bit camera-shop shysters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Color me unconvinced&#8230;at the moment. I like Digg, too, but too many stories recently have been links to questionable sources &#8211; blogs with videos of Google OS, for example, or a 14 year old hired by Google.</p>
<p>One common misconception is that a high number of Diggs gives the story authenticity. One often has to read deep into the comments before a sense of balance is achieved.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t know how much faith I have in swarm behavior to identify and promote important stories or memes. Most of what&#8217;s on Digg will be on BoingBoing, MeFi or their ilk within a day anyway, so it&#8217;s not like Digg is really uncovering anything substantial or new&#8230;.Digg still relies on &#8220;traditional&#8221; media to provide it with something to Digg.</p>
<p>Digg has some trials coming, however. I predict at least ONE major con-job via Digg, most likely a character-assassination of some kind, followed by the invariable lawsuits.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d also point to your story, TH, about PriceRite. While the story was certainly interesting (the vigilante narrative appeals so much to the techy crowd), I don&#8217;t think it was deserving of the massive attention it garnered. Yes, PriceRite&#8217;s a bunch of assholes, but I think there are more socially responsible things to be doing with our outrage than outing some two-bit camera-shop shysters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

