<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 100 Digital Cameras on Flickr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/top-100-digital-cameras-on-flickr.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/top-100-digital-cameras-on-flickr.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon 600D Camera</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/top-100-digital-cameras-on-flickr.html/comment-page-1#comment-434524</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon 600D Camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2339#comment-434524</guid>
		<description>Let me start by saying nice post. Im not sure if it has been talked about, but when using Chrome I can never get the entire site to load  without refreshing many times. Could just be my computer. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start by saying nice post. Im not sure if it has been talked about, but when using Chrome I can never get the entire site to load  without refreshing many times. Could just be my computer. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porno</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/top-100-digital-cameras-on-flickr.html/comment-page-1#comment-297598</link>
		<dc:creator>porno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2339#comment-297598</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for this information.
yess great..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for this information.<br />
yess great..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camera</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/top-100-digital-cameras-on-flickr.html/comment-page-1#comment-285723</link>
		<dc:creator>Camera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2339#comment-285723</guid>
		<description>What you&#039;re saying is wholly true. I be aware of that everybody must say the same thing, but I barely think that you rest it in a style that each one may possibly be aware of. I furthermore love the images you rest in there. They fit accordingly strong with what youre trying to say. Im convinced you&#039;ll reach therefore various community with what you&#039;ve got to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you&#8217;re saying is wholly true. I be aware of that everybody must say the same thing, but I barely think that you rest it in a style that each one may possibly be aware of. I furthermore love the images you rest in there. They fit accordingly strong with what youre trying to say. Im convinced you&#8217;ll reach therefore various community with what you&#8217;ve got to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Camera User</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/top-100-digital-cameras-on-flickr.html/comment-page-1#comment-173163</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Camera User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2339#comment-173163</guid>
		<description>Great post, what would be really interesting is what is the same list but only looking at compact digital cameras.  This would be really helpful when making my decisions as what cameras to add to our camera hire portfolio.

Any got any ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, what would be really interesting is what is the same list but only looking at compact digital cameras.  This would be really helpful when making my decisions as what cameras to add to our camera hire portfolio.</p>
<p>Any got any ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyWarhol</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/top-100-digital-cameras-on-flickr.html/comment-page-1#comment-16166</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyWarhol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2339#comment-16166</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t see my trusty Epson Photo PC500 listed anywhere*&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;sigh.....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;;))&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i&#039;d actually like to create a new camera based on that old model with a nice 3&quot; or 4&quot; LCD &amp; 3 Megapixels* - in case in the unlikelyhood people ever needed to print an 8x10*&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;way too much attention has gone into  6,8,10 or more MP* ridiculous*&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;especially for the Net which is still 640x480*&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t see my trusty Epson Photo PC500 listed anywhere*</p>
<p>sigh&#8230;..</p>
<p> <img src='http://thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>i&#8217;d actually like to create a new camera based on that old model with a nice 3&#8243; or 4&#8243; LCD &#038; 3 Megapixels* &#8211; in case in the unlikelyhood people ever needed to print an 8&#215;10*</p>
<p>way too much attention has gone into  6,8,10 or more MP* ridiculous*</p>
<p>especially for the Net which is still 640&#215;480*</p>
<p> <img src='http://thomashawk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

