<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood Hates You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/hollywood-hates-you.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/hollywood-hates-you.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/hollywood-hates-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-16302</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2356#comment-16302</guid>
		<description>This comment has been removed because it linked to malicious content. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogger.com/content.g&quot;&gt;Learn more&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment has been removed because it linked to malicious content. <a href="http://www.blogger.com/content.g">Learn more</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Aitchison</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/hollywood-hates-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-16306</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Aitchison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2356#comment-16306</guid>
		<description>The market for DIYers is so small that Microsoft can tell them to pack sand and it won&#039;t hurt their bottom line in any measurable way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you have old stuff (non HDCP compliance) likely you will still be able to view the new content but it will be intentionally donconverted to a lesser format, again most consumers won&#039;t even notice and those that do will believe that all they need is an &quot;upgrade&quot; to fix it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sure Macrovision &amp; CSS are easily defeated, and no doubt I&#039;m sure that anything new will be as well, but how many people do you know who have the tools &amp; knowhow to make backup copies of their DVDs or even purchased VHS tapes?  In my case not very many.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The vast majority of cnsumers are already used to not being able to exercise their fair use rights to do things like make backup copies, I&#039;d be willing to bet that a majority don&#039;t even know that it &lt;i&gt;isn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; illegal to make a backup copy of a DVD or VHS tape that you own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also as I pointed out before the vast majority are also used to constant upgrades and will totally believe that their year old PC just isn&#039;t powerful enough or something.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for boycotting the new media, you can try that but eventually as the old media becomes no longer available you start to look like the Unabomber to most of society?  How would you feel if you met a guy who refuses to buy any videos except on Laserdisc?  That&#039;s what the guy who won&#039;t buy Blu-Ray (or HD-DVD) will look like in 5 years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The worst thing is that while the stated purpose of DRM is to &quot;prevent piracy&quot; but any DRM scheme that is remotely useable by your typical NASCAR watching AOLer or Grandmother is going to amount to little more than a speedbump for pirates.  The copyright cartell is well aware that DRM is essentially useless at preventing paracy yet they still shove it down our necks at every opportunity, for the express purpose of interfering with fair use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The market for DIYers is so small that Microsoft can tell them to pack sand and it won&#8217;t hurt their bottom line in any measurable way.</p>
<p>If you have old stuff (non HDCP compliance) likely you will still be able to view the new content but it will be intentionally donconverted to a lesser format, again most consumers won&#8217;t even notice and those that do will believe that all they need is an &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to fix it.</p>
<p>Sure Macrovision &#038; CSS are easily defeated, and no doubt I&#8217;m sure that anything new will be as well, but how many people do you know who have the tools &#038; knowhow to make backup copies of their DVDs or even purchased VHS tapes?  In my case not very many.</p>
<p>The vast majority of cnsumers are already used to not being able to exercise their fair use rights to do things like make backup copies, I&#8217;d be willing to bet that a majority don&#8217;t even know that it <i>isn&#8217;t</i> illegal to make a backup copy of a DVD or VHS tape that you own.</p>
<p>Also as I pointed out before the vast majority are also used to constant upgrades and will totally believe that their year old PC just isn&#8217;t powerful enough or something.</p>
<p>As for boycotting the new media, you can try that but eventually as the old media becomes no longer available you start to look like the Unabomber to most of society?  How would you feel if you met a guy who refuses to buy any videos except on Laserdisc?  That&#8217;s what the guy who won&#8217;t buy Blu-Ray (or HD-DVD) will look like in 5 years.</p>
<p>The worst thing is that while the stated purpose of DRM is to &#8220;prevent piracy&#8221; but any DRM scheme that is remotely useable by your typical NASCAR watching AOLer or Grandmother is going to amount to little more than a speedbump for pirates.  The copyright cartell is well aware that DRM is essentially useless at preventing paracy yet they still shove it down our necks at every opportunity, for the express purpose of interfering with fair use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TravisP</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/hollywood-hates-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-16307</link>
		<dc:creator>TravisP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2356#comment-16307</guid>
		<description>I refuse to go to the cinemas because of the over priced experience it is (why would I want to pay up to £6 for a single cinema ticket when I can pay £4 for the DVD at Blockbuster and have as many people that can fit on my couch watch the movie). When they start to dictate that I can&#039;t build my own Media Center to watch HD content then I am just not going to watch it. I am just not that desperate to see the crap that Hollywood puts out anyway. If Microsoft then make the horrible decision to ignore DIY&#039;ers for MCE for HD content because they are bowing to the pathetic hollywood business then I will just dump my &#039;currently&#039; beloved MCE machines and go back to watching free to air TV. Hollywood sucks, DRM sucks, HDCP sucks &amp; RIAA sucks. Being that CSS &amp; Macrovision took sooooo long to break, all they are really doing is making it more interesting for the crackers. Here in the UK it is taking ages for Digital TV to really take hold because it is just tooo hard for a good amount of people to buy a digital set top box and plug it into their TVs. This of course is government forced as the analogue signal will eventually be turned off, but digital versus analogue is nothing like &#039;we are going to make it hard to watch HD tv because we are greedy bastards&#039;. But then after years of slow take up, Hollywood will then try to force people to use the technology by reducing the output of normal DVDs, but will of course cite things like the capacity etc, not because of DRM. Oh yeah, and once it is impossible for DIY&#039;ers to build MCE machines, I can see the price of the &#039;name brand&#039; machines going up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I refuse to go to the cinemas because of the over priced experience it is (why would I want to pay up to £6 for a single cinema ticket when I can pay £4 for the DVD at Blockbuster and have as many people that can fit on my couch watch the movie). When they start to dictate that I can&#8217;t build my own Media Center to watch HD content then I am just not going to watch it. I am just not that desperate to see the crap that Hollywood puts out anyway. If Microsoft then make the horrible decision to ignore DIY&#8217;ers for MCE for HD content because they are bowing to the pathetic hollywood business then I will just dump my &#8216;currently&#8217; beloved MCE machines and go back to watching free to air TV. Hollywood sucks, DRM sucks, HDCP sucks &#038; RIAA sucks. Being that CSS &#038; Macrovision took sooooo long to break, all they are really doing is making it more interesting for the crackers. Here in the UK it is taking ages for Digital TV to really take hold because it is just tooo hard for a good amount of people to buy a digital set top box and plug it into their TVs. This of course is government forced as the analogue signal will eventually be turned off, but digital versus analogue is nothing like &#8216;we are going to make it hard to watch HD tv because we are greedy bastards&#8217;. But then after years of slow take up, Hollywood will then try to force people to use the technology by reducing the output of normal DVDs, but will of course cite things like the capacity etc, not because of DRM. Oh yeah, and once it is impossible for DIY&#8217;ers to build MCE machines, I can see the price of the &#8216;name brand&#8217; machines going up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/hollywood-hates-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-16308</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2356#comment-16308</guid>
		<description>This is why I still refuse to buy any &quot;HDTV&quot; hardware, TV or otherwise.  I&#039;ve been happy with DirecTV, line-doubled TV and DirecTivo -- can&#039;t see the need to switch to what Ed Bott is experiencing right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I still refuse to buy any &#8220;HDTV&#8221; hardware, TV or otherwise.  I&#8217;ve been happy with DirecTV, line-doubled TV and DirecTivo &#8212; can&#8217;t see the need to switch to what Ed Bott is experiencing right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Aitchison</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/hollywood-hates-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-16309</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Aitchison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2356#comment-16309</guid>
		<description>Sadly I predict that the vast majority of consumers will accept it and in fact won&#039;t even realize how badly they are being screwed.  Just like they accepted CSS and Macrovision before that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The content companies and the hardware manuafcturers aren&#039;t going to say &quot;We&#039;re restricting this unless you buy compliant hardware&quot; their going to say &quot;You need to upgrade to the latest (and greatest) hardware to experience this&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The computer and electronics industry has already set the expectation that you have to constantly &quot;upgrade&quot; to take advantage of a the neat new goodies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly I predict that the vast majority of consumers will accept it and in fact won&#8217;t even realize how badly they are being screwed.  Just like they accepted CSS and Macrovision before that.</p>
<p>The content companies and the hardware manuafcturers aren&#8217;t going to say &#8220;We&#8217;re restricting this unless you buy compliant hardware&#8221; their going to say &#8220;You need to upgrade to the latest (and greatest) hardware to experience this&#8221;.</p>
<p>The computer and electronics industry has already set the expectation that you have to constantly &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to take advantage of a the neat new goodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Grundner</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/hollywood-hates-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-16310</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Grundner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2356#comment-16310</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see that you NOW believe what I&#039;ve been trying to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/entry/1182/what_windows_vista&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tell everyone since July 2005&lt;/a&gt;. I love it when things that I write about turn into reality, which previously labeled as FUD by some (&lt;i&gt;not referring to you&lt;/i&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see that you NOW believe what I&#8217;ve been trying to <a href="http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/entry/1182/what_windows_vista" rel="nofollow">tell everyone since July 2005</a>. I love it when things that I write about turn into reality, which previously labeled as FUD by some (<i>not referring to you</i>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Bermingham</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/02/hollywood-hates-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-16311</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Bermingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2356#comment-16311</guid>
		<description>Also fun is stuff like the fact that the RIAA doesn&#039;t want you to rip your own cds for personal use&lt;br /&gt;http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=29733</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also fun is stuff like the fact that the RIAA doesn&#8217;t want you to rip your own cds for personal use<br /><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=29733" rel="nofollow">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=29733</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
