<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Flickr Working on a Flickr for Video?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/01/is-flickr-working-on-flickr-for-video.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/01/is-flickr-working-on-flickr-for-video.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/01/is-flickr-working-on-flickr-for-video.html/comment-page-1#comment-17657</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2561#comment-17657</guid>
		<description>Seems like kinduva no-brainer to me....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One wonders if Yahoo! will get the jump on Google in this arena...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking of Google and Yahoo!, check out this ominous statement from Carl Icahn re: the future of TW/AOL:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;However, I am deeply concerned&lt;br /&gt;that the Time Warner Board may be on the verge of making a disastrous decision&lt;br /&gt;concerning an agreement with Google if this agreement &lt;b&gt;would make it more&lt;br /&gt;difficult in any way or effectively preclude a merger or other type of&lt;br /&gt;transaction with companies such as IAC/InterActive, eBay, Yahoo!, or Microsoft&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;etc. etc... I believe there are and will be major opportunities to enhance&lt;br /&gt;Time Warner&#039;s value in future combinations. However these transactions might&lt;br /&gt;not be achievable if Time Warner enters into long-term arrangements that&lt;br /&gt;preclude future flexibility such as an agreement regarding search&lt;br /&gt;functionality. I also question whether Google is the best partner for&lt;br /&gt;unlocking the value of the AOL asset.  Indeed, a recent Goldman Sachs report&lt;br /&gt;concludes, &quot;In contrast to the conventional perspective, we believe that eBay,&lt;br /&gt;followed by InterActive Corp, would provide greater incremental benefits to&lt;br /&gt;AOL&#039;s option value with fewer conflicts of interest than Yahoo! while MSN and&lt;br /&gt;Google would provide the least incremental benefits.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;emphasis mine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like kinduva no-brainer to me&#8230;.</p>
<p>One wonders if Yahoo! will get the jump on Google in this arena&#8230;</p>
<p>Speaking of Google and Yahoo!, check out this ominous statement from Carl Icahn re: the future of TW/AOL:</p>
<p>&#8220;However, I am deeply concerned<br />that the Time Warner Board may be on the verge of making a disastrous decision<br />concerning an agreement with Google if this agreement <b>would make it more<br />difficult in any way or effectively preclude a merger or other type of<br />transaction with companies such as IAC/InterActive, eBay, Yahoo!, or Microsoft</b><br />etc. etc&#8230; I believe there are and will be major opportunities to enhance<br />Time Warner&#8217;s value in future combinations. However these transactions might<br />not be achievable if Time Warner enters into long-term arrangements that<br />preclude future flexibility such as an agreement regarding search<br />functionality. I also question whether Google is the best partner for<br />unlocking the value of the AOL asset.  Indeed, a recent Goldman Sachs report<br />concludes, &#8220;In contrast to the conventional perspective, we believe that eBay,<br />followed by InterActive Corp, would provide greater incremental benefits to<br />AOL&#8217;s option value with fewer conflicts of interest than Yahoo! while MSN and<br />Google would provide the least incremental benefits.&#8221;</p>
<p>emphasis mine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dj paine</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/01/is-flickr-working-on-flickr-for-video.html/comment-page-1#comment-17658</link>
		<dc:creator>dj paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2561#comment-17658</guid>
		<description>holy crap man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy crap man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

