<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg vs. Slashdot (or, traffic vs. influence)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2006/01/digg-vs-slashdot-or-traffic-vs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/01/digg-vs-slashdot-or-traffic-vs.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:33:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ThomasGerigk</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/01/digg-vs-slashdot-or-traffic-vs.html/comment-page-1#comment-17540</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomasGerigk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2549#comment-17540</guid>
		<description>Digg has a nicer layout and is easier to read.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If Slashdot were to adapt a newer layout it may also attract a new group of readers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ThomasGerigk.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg has a nicer layout and is easier to read.</p>
<p>If Slashdot were to adapt a newer layout it may also attract a new group of readers.</p>
<p>ThomasGerigk.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2006/01/digg-vs-slashdot-or-traffic-vs.html/comment-page-1#comment-17541</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=2549#comment-17541</guid>
		<description>I agree, I think digg is much better, Slashdot ha been horribly inconsistent in getting news out timely and avoiding duplicates of stories. It&#039;s painfully just a &quot;here&#039;s what we think is interesting&quot; aproach, which honeslty makes it like every other blog, but other blogs usually are much more up to speed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I use a digg search for hdtv and have found several items, like the MariposaHD site i posted about and you linked to, that I otherwise wouldn&#039;t know about.  I submitted the same article to Slashdot later, rejected.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is not a slam or indictment of slashdots editorial policy, but I find it much better to at least have a chance at seeing the 100 interesting articles that maybe didn&#039;t make the front page, instead of the 10 that did today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Maybe slashdot should offfer an rss feed of all stories submitted?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Richard - HDBeat.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I think digg is much better, Slashdot ha been horribly inconsistent in getting news out timely and avoiding duplicates of stories. It&#8217;s painfully just a &#8220;here&#8217;s what we think is interesting&#8221; aproach, which honeslty makes it like every other blog, but other blogs usually are much more up to speed.</p>
<p>I use a digg search for hdtv and have found several items, like the MariposaHD site i posted about and you linked to, that I otherwise wouldn&#8217;t know about.  I submitted the same article to Slashdot later, rejected.</p>
<p>This is not a slam or indictment of slashdots editorial policy, but I find it much better to at least have a chance at seeing the 100 interesting articles that maybe didn&#8217;t make the front page, instead of the 10 that did today.</p>
<p>Maybe slashdot should offfer an rss feed of all stories submitted?</p>
<p>Richard &#8211; HDBeat.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
