<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr and the Pornography Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: strict</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19003</link>
		<dc:creator>strict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=3199#comment-19003</guid>
		<description>What I think is missing from the analysis of the possible solutions of the problem is: why not let the user decide what is lecit / not lecit to be seen from everybody?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I understand that the application of this solution may not be easy but this is the direction we all should hope the web moves into. It would be intresting also to better understand how (and if) the &quot;Flag this photo as may offend&quot; thig works: it shoud be a good starting point to work on this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I think is missing from the analysis of the possible solutions of the problem is: why not let the user decide what is lecit / not lecit to be seen from everybody?</p>
<p>I understand that the application of this solution may not be easy but this is the direction we all should hope the web moves into. It would be intresting also to better understand how (and if) the &#8220;Flag this photo as may offend&#8221; thig works: it shoud be a good starting point to work on this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Chalk</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Chalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=3199#comment-19004</guid>
		<description>well, what really disturbs me about this whole thing is that I actually lifted the &quot;offensive&quot; photo straight out of Terry Richardson&#039;s Terryworld. This book is readily available from amazon and other general purpose bookshops, and is considered to be a photographic art book.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the fact that flickr now imposes more strenuous censorship standards than Amazon or Barnes and Noble is a scary thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, what really disturbs me about this whole thing is that I actually lifted the &#8220;offensive&#8221; photo straight out of Terry Richardson&#8217;s Terryworld. This book is readily available from amazon and other general purpose bookshops, and is considered to be a photographic art book.</p>
<p>the fact that flickr now imposes more strenuous censorship standards than Amazon or Barnes and Noble is a scary thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPWP</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19005</link>
		<dc:creator>PPWP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=3199#comment-19005</guid>
		<description>Except for yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except for yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hawk</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19006</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=3199#comment-19006</guid>
		<description>PPWP, of course you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPWP, of course you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPWP</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19007</link>
		<dc:creator>PPWP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=3199#comment-19007</guid>
		<description>I believe all flesh on Flickr should be banned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe all flesh on Flickr should be banned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Superchou</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19008</link>
		<dc:creator>Superchou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=3199#comment-19008</guid>
		<description>well done thomas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done thomas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.J.</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19009</link>
		<dc:creator>C.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=3199#comment-19009</guid>
		<description>well... if flickr allows nude art to be posted in public groups, but doesnt allow porn, then isnt that was the censors are doing???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well&#8230; if flickr allows nude art to be posted in public groups, but doesnt allow porn, then isnt that was the censors are doing???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Butterfield</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19010</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Butterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 11:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=3199#comment-19010</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Ana&#039;s determining the aesthetic/philosophical question what&#039;s art and what&#039;s porn, but merely what&#039;s should show up public areas of Flickr.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, to the larger point: the way we&#039;re handling it now is no good and will only continue until we&#039;re able to implement the better solution (which is coming).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Ana&#8217;s determining the aesthetic/philosophical question what&#8217;s art and what&#8217;s porn, but merely what&#8217;s should show up public areas of Flickr.</p>
<p>But, to the larger point: the way we&#8217;re handling it now is no good and will only continue until we&#8217;re able to implement the better solution (which is coming).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.J.</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/10/flickr-and-pornography-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-19011</link>
		<dc:creator>C.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=3199#comment-19011</guid>
		<description>(FYI zoto does not censor its members, so it seems.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;what bothers me more is that &quot;Ana&quot; from flickr is now the one to determine what is art and what is pr0n...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(FYI zoto does not censor its members, so it seems.)</p>
<p>what bothers me more is that &#8220;Ana&#8221; from flickr is now the one to determine what is art and what is pr0n&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

