Davis Freeberg on Today's Netflix Analyst Call

Editor's note: Davis Freeberg has joined me here at Thomas Hawk's Digital Connection as a contributing writer. In addition to articles about the new digital lifestyle in general, Davis will also begin offering greater coverage of both TiVo and now Netflix. What follows is a report that Davis filed today on Netflix's quarterly earnings and their follow up analyst conference call. Please join me in welcoming Davis to Thomas Hawk's Digital Connection. Davis can be contacted directly at davisfreeberg@thomashawk.com. By way of disclosure regarding the article below, Davis is currently a Netflix subscriber as well as a current Netflix shareholder.
by Davis Freeberg, Contributing Writer
Netflix has been an interesting company to follow. After seeing two years of blistering growth in their stock, investors have become more cautious over the last six months about the company's future. Much of the fear surrounding Netflix stems from competition that they face from Blockbuster, Amazon.com and even more significantly, the holy grail of Media, VOD (Video on Demand).
Reed Hastings, Netflix's CEO and Co-Founder spoke this afternoon about his company and their prospects in the upcoming months.
Ultimately, Hastings sees the overall market for online DVD rentals increasing to 10 - 20 million subscribers by 2010. During the conference call, Hastings tried to reassure shareholders of the significance of DVDs. Hastings pointed out that Disney makes more money selling DVDs than Comcast makes entirely as a company.
According to Hastings, at the recent NCTA Cable conference a number of media executives expressed their support for the DVD market over Video on Demand. Given that the entertainment industry is making significant capital expenditures on HDDVD Hastings may have an accurate point about the entertainment industry's preference for DVDs over VOD.
Although the entertainment industry may make more money per sale selling DVDs than VOD, I know that I personally would prefer High Definition Video on Demand over online DVD's any day of the week. I suspect that most other consumers would feel this way as well.
Generally speaking, the media industry as a whole is not interested in allowing VOD to prosper. They very well may need to be dragged into it kicking and screaming perhaps much like the music industry was forced to the table on digital music downloads. The margins on DVD sales are simply too fat to allow for the ultimate everything on demand solution.
While consumers have no problem shelling out cash to buy a DVD, people would never pay $20 to "buy" a VOD view. In the same way that it took the adoption of Napster and Kazaa to convince the Media Industry to allow iTunes and other online mp3 sites, the recent development of video and audio podcasting, DVRs and BitTorrent technology should ultimately force the Media industry to embrace new VOD technology. The real question is whether this buys Netflix 5 - 10 years like Hastings suggests or whether the company will be forced to innovate more quickly. Hopefully the later.
In looking through Netflix's numbers, it is a little concerning that only 4.6% of their revenue is used for technological development. In many ways the DVD rental market is a lot like the Dial Up ISP market of yesteryear. Just like AOL has failed to address the systemic loss of subscribers to broadband access, Netflix faces a situation where, without the right capital investments and media partnerships, they could ultimately become outdated and irrelevant before they ever even see a 10 year anniversary as a business.
As more consumers embrace alternative forms of entertainment, DVRs and ultimately VOD, Netflix will be forced to transition from a distribution center to a content aggregator and provider.
During the call, Hastings suggested that he sees the DVD market developing into a two company market which should result in higher margins. If this turns out to be the case, then it bodes well for Netflix in the short run. Blockbuster has had significant issues with customer satisfaction, controversy surrounding censorship, lawsuits for false advertising and hostile shareholders Blockbuster has contractually committed to keeping their prices at current levels until at least January of 2006, but there is definitely shareholder pressure on Blockbuster to limit the amount of money and resources that they spend on their online service.
Contrast this to Hastings' view that "current Netflix subscribers are great evangelists for our service."
I would go a step further and say that not only are the Netflix customers evangelists, but that management feels as passionately about what they are doing themselves. Hastings originally created Netflix after Blockbuster charged him a $40 late fee. It's personal. Also positive to note of late is that we have recently seen an increase in insider stock acquisition.
One wild card that is still out there is whether a deal with Amazon might be around the corner. During the call, Gordon Hodge with Thomas Weisel Partners asked about the speculation that Amazon could ultimately team up with Netflix or with Blockbuster. As you would expect the company offered no comment.
Hastings did seem very adamant, however, that in the future it will be a two competitor system. This may help to fuel speculation that Amazon will ultimately outsource their DVD rental program. If Hastings is correct and Amazon ultimately hires Netflix or Blockbuster as a distribution partner, then it's possible that we could see prices increase next January. During the call Hastings alluded that if Amazon chooses to enter as a competitor, then the current price war will continue.
What was most impressive about Netflix's call was their significant subscriber growth. They were able to add 408,000 net subscribers during the quarter, but did so at greater subscriber acquisition costs and a greater churn rate, then previously experienced. On the call, Hastings pointed out that "despite Blockbuster's aggressive pricing, in-store promotions and TV advertising, Netflix still generated a record number of gross subscriber additions."
While Netflix decided to suspend future subscriber guidance, if they can continue adding subscribers at this pace, they should easily hit 10 million subscribers by 2010. Interestingly enough, Hasting recently made suggestions that once Netflix reaches 10 - 20 million subscribers, he sees the company transitioning to an independent production studio similar to HBO.
During the call, Netflix heavily promoted their new lower price / less DVD options as being an important aspect to their future growth. Because their margins are the same at the $9.99 level as they are at the $17.99 level, Hastings seemed to feel that Netflix would be "agnostic" about which plan consumers choose. They plan on using the $9.99 price level to attract more mainstream adopters and feel that they can return to profitability by the third and fourth quarter of this year.
Netflix expects to have free cash flow beginning this quarter, however they did forecast an earnings loss of $2.2 - $7.2 million for the second quarter. This is due to their commitment to increased marketing costs in the wake of Blockbuster's current ad campaign.
Hastings pointed out that one reason for the heavy promotion of the new $9.99 plan is that "the fewer DVDs that you have at home, the more important it becomes for a company like us to ship you DVDs on time." This helps to "shift the playing field a little bit in a way that will be advantages to Netflix." This could help to provide a clearer differentiation between services.
Currently, Netflix has 31 distribution centers and 90% of their customers receive their DVDs overnight.
The two biggest issues that weren't addressed on the call were Netflix's current short position and their relationship with TiVo.
Currently, Netflix has 15 million shares (with approximately 45 million shares trading in the market) that are shorted (shares that have been sold by people who don't own the stock and must buy it back at a later date.) While this number isn't as high as the 22 million share short position they had in November, it does make me wonder. Who would short a growing company, in a growing industry with enough cash on hand to stay alive for a very long time (approximately $170 Million)?
Given the current proliferation of hedge funds, it's hard to determine if an increase in their stock price would scare short sellers into buying or if it would have no effect on the stock. You can call me a conspiracy theorist if you would like, but I find it hard believe that your average stock consumer is sophisticated enough to short a stock like Netflix. Could it be that the Media industry or possibly a competitor is trying to artificially keep the price of their stock low or is this simply a reflection of shareholder concerns over their current price war? Either way, just like we have reportable events for companies and individuals that are long large stock positions, the regulators should consider regulations that require large short holders to report when they buy or sell as well.
As an avid technology proponent, I found Hastings lack of comments about VOD as well as their previous announced relationship with TiVo very disappointing. I've been waiting for everything on demand for a very long time and for them not to address their partnership with TiVo was a bad sign for major media VOD.
Also, with TiVo's most recent partnership with Comcast, one can't help but wonder if Tivoflix is dead in the water at this point. It's hard to imagine a scenario where Comcast, Time Warner or Cox would allow a partner to sell VOD.
Currently, Microsoft offers VOD via their Window's Media Center through Cinema Now and Movielink, but it's unclear as to how well it's been embraced by customers. One issue is that the picture quality is nowhere near as good as DVD or HDTV.
As the DVD market transforms into a VOD market, cable will ultimately be the real competition with Netflix not Blockbuster. Their ability to innovate, partner and bring VOD to the mass markets, will determine whether this company will ultimately succeed or fail. They may make money today pursuing a DVD mail delivery strategy but it is imperative that they also develop a better longer-term game plan.
Gina Keating has her take on the news today at Irunix.com.
Hacking Netflix, the premier Netflix site on the internet, has their comments on the call here.




3 Comments:
Take this with a grain of salt since I admittedly work for a company called DVD Station www.dvdstation.com which is in nomenclature and operating model not a VOD play but is a strong believer in packaged media.
Although, we agree the value proposition of VOD and especially HDVOD is undeniably compelling (in the long run it seems that is must win), here are some quick thoughts on why we're still bullish on packaged media:
A typical Blockbuster distributes 16 terabytes of data a week via DVD. Granted the standard DVD format is based upon an old codec and can be compressed nearly 6-fold with nominal degradation in quality, but the HDDVD formats will be built with better codecs and will carry 3 to 9 times the data. With 8,000 locations, Blockbuster will be moving many petabytes of data weekly. Consumers may trade viewing quality and viewing selection for convenience but bandwidth costs alone (even with P2P)shouldn't be overlooked, Reed Hastings could probably provide a perspective on the bandwidth costs for them to replicate their service via VOD vs. their sneakernet. Simple server storage for the data contained on 30,000 films would cost millions annually whereas one could store 30,000 DVDs in a small unrefrigerated closet.
Veronis Suhler, Adams Media Research, and ABN Amro seem to concur that over $300BB will be spent on packaged digital entertainment between now and 2010 and that the estimates for VOD are closer to $10BB (a rounding error) over the same time horizon. They could be horribly wrong but they'd have to be to ignore continued double digit growth in the multi-billion dollar market for packaged media.
The studios and electronics companies are making multi-billion dollar bets on building the next-generation platform for packaged media, they could be horribly wrong but since the studios also hold the IP, their views and bets shouldn't be entirely dismissed.
VOD is no doubt sexier and will create new distribution channels, new publishers, and some very valuable tech company enablers but placing 17 gigabytes on a piece of plastic that costs $.20, that has strong DRM protections, easy portability (share with friends, play in car, get from a laptop to TV in seconds), near flawless data transfers,etc. etc. is no small feat. Perhaps it only has a 10-year life but, our belief is that it will take Starbucks 50 years to equal the dollars spent on packaged media over that time period and it will accomplish this with much, much lower margins.
Compression algorithms will get better, bandwidith and storage costs will make exponential leaps, technologies currently undreamed of will emerge but for the next decade we're placing a big bet on little plastic disks and several small bets on alternative platforms (personal media player downloads, flash-based storage downloads, and others).
Really great points Bill. Thank you for sharing them.
心中一阵不安升降机,因为我忽然又想起了那道剑光升降平台,可怕的剑光升降台,美丽的剑光登车桥。为什么那一剑是那么的美丽货架,却又那么的可怕呢集装袋?在我倒下之前我说地磅,好美的剑塑料托盘,好恨的剑塑料托盘。我倒下了仓储笼。在我失去知觉之前仓储笼,我听到他说北京货架,这叫艺术超市货架,剑的艺术北京货架。
我并没有死广州货架,原来我的心是在右边仓储货架,而是不是左边货架厂。所以在那穿胸一剑之下我并没有死南京货架。
是一阵暴雨把我冲醒了货架公司。听说雨是上天的眼泪深圳货架,也许这天又有人死在那美丽的剑光之下吧服装货架!我张开嘴巴托盘,任雨水打进我的嘴托盘,直冲我的胃塑料托盘。我的伤口又开始流血塑料托盘,但已经不痛了木托盘。试问:仓储笼一个心已经死了的人仓储笼,肉体上的疼痛又算得了什么呢仓储笼?我知道我的刀再练一百年也无法那么美丽仓储笼,那么恨托盘,而且永远别想杀了他托盘。
我退出江湖了手推车,我没有通知江湖上的朋友们静音手推车,并来一个什么金盆洗手静音手推车,因为我的朋友们差不多都被他杀了置物架。我悄悄的走了置物架,隐进了山林之中堆垛架。俨然一个世外高人的样子堆垛架,每天一壶绿茶登高车,放在身边的几上登高车,然后或盯着一朵白云超市手推车,或盯着一片树叶物流手推车,或双目紧闭物流台车。我的刀在玉盆中泡了七七四十九天角钢货架,已经没有血腥味了角钢货架。然后我把它放在我的屋顶轻型货架,任它风吹雨打轻型货架。
十年就这年过去了中型货架。为何今天天忽然想起那柄剑中型货架,那道剑光重型货架?而且内心为什么如此不安重型货架?不应该是这样的仓库货架,对于一个喝了十年绿茶的人来说服装货架,面对死上海货架,也已不再惧怕精品货架,不再不安苏州货架,但今天又为何如此呢托盘货架?
莫非是他青岛货架,和他的剑库房货架,加上他的剑光沈阳货架。我已不问江湖之事天津货架,想他十年前也应该坐上武林盟主的位子了杭州货架,一个武林中人做了武林盟主山东货架,这一生还有什么要求的呢文件柜?
我不停的喝着绿茶工具柜。绿茶静心工具柜。但此时怎么也静不下来零件柜。茶已尽工作台。平时茶尽之时工作台,正也是日落之时工作桌。
一定快有什么事情发生了工作桌。
剑还是那美丽的剑Google左侧排名,如果再加上一道剑光吹塑机,就会形成剑的艺术色带,武学的艺术电源插座。
我问反光背心:为何还来找我滚针轴承,我已在十年之前就退出江湖了夜光粉。
他说文化石:因为你没死缎带,因为我没有对手风火轮。
我说激光打标机:十年前已不是你的对手平衡机,何况现在十年未动刀大功率led。
他说磁力泵:放眼天下梯子,只有你一个人是我的对手网眼袋,也只你一个人对我的威胁无尘布。
我不再说话手摇手电筒,因为我不知道说什么手板,我知道我十年前就开始找我毛巾布,发现我没有死就开始找我磁钢。我不死促销台,他心不安模具钢材。
他说时尚配饰:拿出你的刀筛网。
我说齿轮泵:我已无刀天使花房,命托辊,亦可有可无色丁。
他盯着我广告衫,握剑的手越来越紧钢坯,我知道那道美丽的剑光可能随时发出过滤网。在那美丽过后疏水阀,我的生命将画上句号胸章。
阳光照在了刀上发热管,反射到他的脸上手机耳机。他发现了那把刀螺杆,我的刀插销,宝刀蝴蝶,没有鞘的刀工具包。
刀已在我手中点钞机,刀还是那把刀配电箱,人却已不是那个人流苏,因为心不是那颗心沙滩巾。
他为了杀我竟找了我十年氯化镁,而为了和我比武竟帮我从屋顶拿下我的刀来双面胶带,并放在我的手中碳纤维。我忽然发现排线,他也变了汽车座垫,他在后悔十年前将所有高手都杀绝珍珠奶茶。
高手的悲哀太阳伞。
我握紧了刀桥架,我看着他的眼tpr,已经不再像十年前那样明亮了钢丝。
他的剑划出柴油发电机组,划出一道美丽的剑光护栏。我想围栏,这十年他大概在不停地使自己的剑光更美围栏。
我的刀也出了隔离网。简单的动作隔离网,一刀刺进了他的胸网片。那道美丽的光忽然停止网片,停在我的衣服上南京货架。
他说北京货架:这也是艺术北京货架,杀人的艺术北京货架,想不到你十年不动刀还懂这个艺术仓储货架。
我说仓储货架:因为我不想再让你痛苦了广州货架。
他说广州货架:谢谢货架厂。
我走了货架公司。我头也不回的走了塑料托盘。没有取回我的刀塑料托盘,因为我觉得它在我身边已经没用塑料托盘,我后悔我十年前为什么不扔了它塑料托盘?我听到了尸体倒下的声音塑料托盘。我流泪了塑料托盘,我真的不想杀他仓储笼,十年前不想仓储笼,十年后也不想仓储笼,因为我下山时答应过师父仓储笼,一切让着他仓储笼。
我叹了一口气仓储笼。远去仓储笼。
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home