<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TiVo Pauses Company Costs and Growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2005/03/tivo-pauses-company-costs-and-growth.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/03/tivo-pauses-company-costs-and-growth.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/03/tivo-pauses-company-costs-and-growth.html/comment-page-1#comment-20195</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=4200#comment-20195</guid>
		<description>ok. i love TiVO. waaaay superior to their cable-dvr counterparts.  i own 2 tivo boxes...both of which are still in their boxes.  why?  well, since my landlord wont let me install a satellite dish on her roof, there goes my DirecTV tivo box.  so why arent i using my other series 2 tivo box?  because cablevision&#039;s poor attempt at a DVR system HAS the capability of a double tuner recorder.  tivo&#039;s dont, unless you have the directivo.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;want more definite subscribers?  tivo must develop the double tuner box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok. i love TiVO. waaaay superior to their cable-dvr counterparts.  i own 2 tivo boxes&#8230;both of which are still in their boxes.  why?  well, since my landlord wont let me install a satellite dish on her roof, there goes my DirecTV tivo box.  so why arent i using my other series 2 tivo box?  because cablevision&#8217;s poor attempt at a DVR system HAS the capability of a double tuner recorder.  tivo&#8217;s dont, unless you have the directivo.  </p>
<p>want more definite subscribers?  tivo must develop the double tuner box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tc</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/03/tivo-pauses-company-costs-and-growth.html/comment-page-1#comment-20196</link>
		<dc:creator>Tc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=4200#comment-20196</guid>
		<description>The could come out with a HD compatible receiver at a realistic price point and take the lead position in the hdtv pvr category.  Higher margins, and take the lead in households with early adopters (ie $$) with a true convergance device.  Its simple.  HD PVR tivo with integrated 802.11g and gig E for about $500 or 700 with extreme storage.  Ability to play back your tivo shows on your PC or laptop.  The high end consumer would embrace that BIG time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The could come out with a HD compatible receiver at a realistic price point and take the lead position in the hdtv pvr category.  Higher margins, and take the lead in households with early adopters (ie $$) with a true convergance device.  Its simple.  HD PVR tivo with integrated 802.11g and gig E for about $500 or 700 with extreme storage.  Ability to play back your tivo shows on your PC or laptop.  The high end consumer would embrace that BIG time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discfree.com</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/03/tivo-pauses-company-costs-and-growth.html/comment-page-1#comment-20197</link>
		<dc:creator>Discfree.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=4200#comment-20197</guid>
		<description>It makes sense why they would retire all of their debt and put the company in a profitable position, but is it really the right strategy with Cable moving into TIVO territory, why not rent out their boxes at a higher subscription rate?  Why not spend MORE money today in exchange for 2 year contracts.  It&#039;s worked for the phone industry, it sounds like it&#039;s working for the cable industry and I think that there would be plenty of consumers who would rather pay Tivo $20 per month, then to use the crappy motorola and scientific atlantic boxes.  I think that Ramsey still wants to control the company and will ultimately control the new CEO.  He needs to quit the board and allow a CEO with real vision to take over.  The good news is that if he continues to cash out his stock at the expense of shareholders, then eventually, he won&#039;t have the power to stay on the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense why they would retire all of their debt and put the company in a profitable position, but is it really the right strategy with Cable moving into TIVO territory, why not rent out their boxes at a higher subscription rate?  Why not spend MORE money today in exchange for 2 year contracts.  It&#8217;s worked for the phone industry, it sounds like it&#8217;s working for the cable industry and I think that there would be plenty of consumers who would rather pay Tivo $20 per month, then to use the crappy motorola and scientific atlantic boxes.  I think that Ramsey still wants to control the company and will ultimately control the new CEO.  He needs to quit the board and allow a CEO with real vision to take over.  The good news is that if he continues to cash out his stock at the expense of shareholders, then eventually, he won&#8217;t have the power to stay on the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
