<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner&#8217;s New &#8220;Start Over&#8221; Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2005/03/time-warners-new-start-over-service.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/03/time-warners-new-start-over-service.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/03/time-warners-new-start-over-service.html/comment-page-1#comment-20095</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=4096#comment-20095</guid>
		<description>From my perspective, I think Time Warner&#039;s rollout of this service (which eliminates basically all DVR functionality as Thomas pointed out), indicates that the DVR business model is unfeasible for the cable service providers since they give away the boxes (eating the upfront cost), especially given the high fail rate of the crappy Scientific Atlanta boxes which they are forced to replace at no cost to the consumer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the article:&lt;br /&gt;One of the problems with DVR boxes, in addition to the initial cost, is that &quot;hard drives fail,&quot; and have to be replaced eventually, Time Warner Cable chief executive Glenn Britt said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my perspective, I think Time Warner&#8217;s rollout of this service (which eliminates basically all DVR functionality as Thomas pointed out), indicates that the DVR business model is unfeasible for the cable service providers since they give away the boxes (eating the upfront cost), especially given the high fail rate of the crappy Scientific Atlanta boxes which they are forced to replace at no cost to the consumer.</p>
<p>According to the article:<br />One of the problems with DVR boxes, in addition to the initial cost, is that &#8220;hard drives fail,&#8221; and have to be replaced eventually, Time Warner Cable chief executive Glenn Britt said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discfree.com</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/03/time-warners-new-start-over-service.html/comment-page-1#comment-20096</link>
		<dc:creator>Discfree.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=4096#comment-20096</guid>
		<description>hmmm this seems like a very tricky way to get around Tivo&#039;s Time warping patent.  Very Clever on Time Warner&#039;s Part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm this seems like a very tricky way to get around Tivo&#8217;s Time warping patent.  Very Clever on Time Warner&#8217;s Part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

