<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTunes hits 250 million downloads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomashawk.com/2005/01/itunes-hits-250-million-downloads.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/01/itunes-hits-250-million-downloads.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Not Appearing in this Blog</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/01/itunes-hits-250-million-downloads.html/comment-page-1#comment-20791</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Not Appearing in this Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=4423#comment-20791</guid>
		<description>As an addendum:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m not opposed to the iTMS because of the DRM-I&#039;m opposed to it because you pay full price for a compressed copy of the music. You don&#039;t even get a CD if you buy a full album!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If they started offering their music in Apple Lossless (at current prices) I might be more favourably inclined to use the store. As it stands, the only stuff I&#039;ve downloaded from them was the free political stuff they made available last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an addendum:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not opposed to the iTMS because of the DRM-I&#8217;m opposed to it because you pay full price for a compressed copy of the music. You don&#8217;t even get a CD if you buy a full album!</p>
<p>If they started offering their music in Apple Lossless (at current prices) I might be more favourably inclined to use the store. As it stands, the only stuff I&#8217;ve downloaded from them was the free political stuff they made available last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Not Appearing in this Blog</title>
		<link>http://thomashawk.com/2005/01/itunes-hits-250-million-downloads.html/comment-page-1#comment-20792</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Not Appearing in this Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/thomashawk/?p=4423#comment-20792</guid>
		<description>You DO realise that only tracks purchased from the iTune music store have the DRM on them, don&#039;t you? Nothing you encode yourself will have DRM on it. Any MP3s, AAC or Apple Lossless files you create are clean.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve found iTunes to be an excellent library management tool. If you already have something which does this (I assume MCE does) and you don&#039;t have an iPod, then there&#039;s no real need for iTunes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You DO realise that only tracks purchased from the iTune music store have the DRM on them, don&#8217;t you? Nothing you encode yourself will have DRM on it. Any MP3s, AAC or Apple Lossless files you create are clean.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found iTunes to be an excellent library management tool. If you already have something which does this (I assume MCE does) and you don&#8217;t have an iPod, then there&#8217;s no real need for iTunes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

